Hingham Naval Ammunition Depot

The Hingham Naval Ammunition Depot, is a former United States Navy ammunition depot located in Hingham, Massachusetts. At its peak, it employed over 2,400 people.[1] It also consisted of 90 buildings at that time.[2][3] The Hingham Naval Ammunition Depot Annex was located nearby, and served as a storage area for the depot.

Hingham Naval Ammunition Depot
Part of United States Navy
Hingham, Massachusetts
Employees working with the Automatic 16 Inch Powder Stacking Machine during World War II
Coordinates42°14′8.12″N 70°54′58.61″W
TypeAmmunition Depot
Site information
Controlled byNavy
Open to
the public
Yes
Site history
In use1903-1961
US Navy aerial photo of Hingham Naval Ammunition Depot circa 1942 - Colorized by Steve Gill 2015.

History

From 1903 until 1961, The Hingham Naval Ammunition Depot (originally called the Hingham Naval Reserve) was a major supplier of U.S. munitions, occupying 990 acres (4.0 km2) on the Weymouth Back River (in the section once known as The Hockley). Camp Hingham was a US Navy training camp from 1917 to 1925; its land became part of the depot.[4] At peak capacity in 1945, over 2,400 civilians and military personnel worked there. In the mid 1950s, the site contained over 90 buildings, its own telephone exchange, and 15 cranes. The base was decommissioned in 1961, though the Navy held on to the property until 1971, when it was turned over to the town of Hingham. Today much of the site is now occupied by the town's Bare Cove Park.

Starting in 2016, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers launched a multi-year investigation into potential hazards in and around the former depot. The Corps identified six areas of interest and searched for detonated pieces of ordnance. So far, nothing has been found. [5]

gollark: In CS, we have a few examples of *provably* secure systems.
gollark: For example, if the court system was terrible and just asked the defendant whether they had broken the law and trusted them to be right, that would obviously be nonrobust.
gollark: No. There are robust systems and less robust ones.
gollark: Intentions don't matter very much if the outcomes are bad.
gollark: They might be designed to be. That doesn't mean they *actually are*.

See also

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.