Hillman v. Maretta

Hillman v. Maretta
Hillman v. Maretta
	Supreme Court of the United States
Argued April 22, 2013; Decided June 3, 2013
Full case name	Jacqueline Hillman, petitioner, v. Judy A. Maretta
Docket no.	11-1221
Citations	569 U.S. 483 (more) 133 S. Ct. 1943; 186 L. Ed. 2d 43
Holding
	Section D of the Virginia statute is pre-empted by FEGLIA
Court membership
	Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy; Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg; Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito; Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
Majority	Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Scalia (Except as to footnote 4), Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan
Concurrence	Thomas, Alito
Laws applied
	Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance Act (1954)

Hilmann v. Maretta, 569 U.S. 483 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court decision in which the court unanimously ruled that a Virginia statute revoking beneficiary status for spouses whose marital status has changed was pre-empted by the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance Act (1954).[1]

Details

Warren Hillman was a retired employee of the General Services Administration under the Federal Government of the United States. He married Judy Maretta in 1989, but they divorced in 1998. However, Hillman had designated Maretta as his federal life insurance policy beneficiary in 1996. Warren Hillman later married Jacqueline or Jackie in 2002, but died of leukemia at the age of 66 in 2008. In his will, he had "left everything" to his wife Jackie.[2]

After Warren Hillman's death, Maretta claimed the life insurance policy and was paid $124,558.03. Jackie Hillman sued Maretta to recover the benefits under the Commonwealth of Virginia statute that revoked a divorced spouse's beneficiary in favor of a widow or widower. The Fairfax County Circuit Court decided the case in Hillman's favor, awarding her the FEGLI benefits. However, the decision was overturned by the Virginia Supreme Court, which ruled that federal insurance programs preempt state laws, citing previous U. S. Supreme Court decisions Wissner v. Wissner and Ridgeway v. Ridgeway.[2]

Jackie Hillman then appealed to the Supreme Court, which heard the arguments on April 22, 2013, and decided on June 3. Associate Justice Sotomayor in the majority ruling affirmed the Virginia Supreme Court decision, arguing that the order of precedence set by FEGLI sought to honor a federal employee's choice of beneficiary.[1]

gollark: For many people programming is probably harder than the cooling system.

gollark: you could equally just cycle it on and off and stick a few coolers in.

gollark: I, personally, enjoy being able to reset my reactor if I mess it up slightly (wrong fuel).

gollark: Besides, you lose fuel if you break the controller.

gollark: I don't care at all. Too much work for an insignificant thing.

References

Singh, Tejinder (June 3, 2013). "States can't override federal employees' life insurance designations". SCOTUS Blog. Retrieved 4 June 2013.
Reese, Diana (April 25, 2013). "The story behind Hillman v. Maretta: The daughter talks about the widow and the ex-wife". Washington Post. Retrieved 4 June 2013.

External links

Text of Hilmann v. Maretta, 569 U.S. 483 (2013) is available from: Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion)

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[scotusblog-analysis-1] Singh, Tejinder (June 3, 2013). "States can't override federal employees' life insurance designations". SCOTUS Blog. Retrieved 4 June 2013.

[washpost-2] Reese, Diana (April 25, 2013). "The story behind Hillman v. Maretta: The daughter talks about the widow and the ex-wife". Washington Post. Retrieved 4 June 2013.