Hervey-Bathurst baronets

The Hervey-Bathurst Baronetcy, of Lainston in the County of Southampton, is a title in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom. It was created on 7 December 1818 for Felton Hervey-Bathurst,[1] with remainder, failing heirs male of his own, to the heirs male of his father. Hervey-Bathurst was the grandson of the Hon. Felton Hervey, seventh son of John Hervey, 1st Earl of Bristol, and served as an Aide-de-Camp to the Duke of Wellington after the Battle of Waterloo. Born Felton Hervey, he had assumed by Royal licence the additional surname of Bathurst in 1801. He was succeeded according to the special remainder by his next brother, the second Baronet. The fourth Baronet sat as Conservative Member of Parliament for Wiltshire South. The fifth Baronet was a Major in the Grenadier Guards and fought in the Egypt campaign of 1898, in the Second Boer War and in the First World War, where he was awarded the Distinguished Service Order. As of 2017, the baronetcy is held by the 8th baronet, who succeeded in 2011. As a male-line descendant of the first Earl of Bristol, he is also in remainder to this peerage, which is currently held by his kinsman the Marquess of Bristol.

Hervey-Bathurst baronets, of Lainston (1818)
  • Sir Felton Elwell Hervey-Bathurst, 1st Baronet (1782–1819)
  • Sir Frederick Anne Hervey-Bathurst, 2nd Baronet (1783–1824)
  • Sir Frederick Hutchinson Hervey-Bathurst, 3rd Baronet (1807–1881)
  • Lt.-Col. Sir Frederick Thomas Arthur Hervey-Bathurst, 4th Baronet (1833–1900)
  • Sir Frederick Edward William Hervey-Bathurst, 5th Baronet DSO, (1870–1956)
  • Sir Frederick Peter Methuen Hervey-Bathurst, 6th Baronet (1903–1995)
  • Sir (Frederick) John Charles Gordon Hervey-Bathurst, 7th Baronet (1934–2011)
  • Sir Frederick William John Hervey-Bathurst, 8th Baronet (born 1965)

The heir apparent to the baronetcy is Frederick Benjamin Guy Hervey-Bathurst (born 1998), only son of the 8th Baronet.

gollark: PHP has... point 1 going for it?
gollark: hhaahahahahahahahahahhhahahahahaha
gollark: It's functionally pure, so your code can be replaced with `main = return ()` with no real change.
gollark: Nonsense. Haskell is perfectly maintainable.
gollark: String interpolation, while quite convenient, can lead to injection things since it's easier than doing things properly with bound parameters or HTML escaping or whatever.

See also

Notes
  1. "No. 17404". The London Gazette. 3 October 1818. p. 1767.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.