Here to Stay (Greg Sczebel album)

Here to Stay is the debut album by Greg Sczebel. The album won the Juno Award for Contemporary Christian/Gospel Album of the Year at the Juno Awards of 2005.[3] Here to Stay also won two Shai Awards in 2005, for Contemporary/Pop Album of the Year, and Urban/Soul Album of the Year. In addition the album won the Outstanding Christian Recording award at the 2005 Western Canadian Music Awards.[4]

Here to Stay
Studio album by
ReleasedJune 1, 2004
GenreContemporary Christian music
Length38:45
ProducerGreg Sczebel
Jerry Sczebel
Greg Sczebel chronology
Here to Stay
(2004)
Love & the Lack Thereof
(2009)
Professional ratings
Review scores
SourceRating
Cross Rhythms [1]
Soul Shine Magazine [2]

The Shai 2005 Song of the Year award went to "In the Pocket". The song "Here to Stay" was also the 2004 Grand Prize Winner, Gospel Category in the John Lennon Songwriting Contest, while "You've Got It" was 2005 Finalist, Session I, in the R&B Category.[5] "In The Pocket" was a finalist in the Gospel/Christian Music category of the 2005 International Songwriting Competition (ISC).[6] The song "Lights Are Comin' On" was awarded Rap/Hip Hop/Dance Song of the Year at the 2004 GMA Canada Covenant Awards.[7] "Everybody" was awarded Urban Song of the Year at the 2005 GMA Canada Covenant Awards.[7]

Track listing

  1. "Here to Stay" - 4:03
  2. "In the Pocket" - 4:06
  3. "Lights are Comin' On" - 3:08
  4. "Perhaps" - 4:04
  5. "Still the One" - 4:07
  6. "You've Got It" - 3:44
  7. "Everybody" - 2:28
  8. "Satisfy" - 2:25
  9. "You've Got It (Reprise)" - 1:58
  10. "Unlisted" - 4:21
  11. "Thank You" - 4:21

Words by Greg Sczebel, except "Thank You" by Greg and Jerry Sczebel.

gollark: Well, yes, but not your claims that:- ☭ is extremely high energy but the energy is distributed amongst all ☭ instances- *somehow* apiochronoformic manipulation used to deploy age-specific cognitohazards would cause them all to teleport into each other
gollark: This whole ☭ annihilation mechanism just seems ridiculous.
gollark: No, the ☭-¬☭ annihilation causing such a scenario was implausible, not apiochronoformics.
gollark: Anything THAT overpowered would have been patched out ages ago.
gollark: This seems implausible. Not only would this violate causality and many other things, there's no plausible mechanism for how this works, and GTech™ testing *frequently* appeared to cause ☭-¬☭ pair production and annihilation which did not destroy the universe.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.