Henry Kendall Ltd v William Lillico Ltd

Henry Kendall Ltd v William Lillico Ltd [1969] 2 AC 31 is an English contract law case concerning the incorporation of contract terms through a course of dealings.

Henry Kendall Ltd v William Lillico Ltd
CourtHouse of Lords
Citation(s)[1969] 2 AC 31
Transcript(s)
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingLord Reid, Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest, Lord Guest, Lord Pearce, Lord Wilberforce
Keywords
Incorporation

Facts

Animal food was sold by merchants to a farmer. It was defective. The merchants brought in suppliers, and they in turn brought in their suppliers, a long chain. (hence also Hardwick Game v Suffolk Agricultural Poultry Producers Association). Purchases three or four times a month had happened for three or so years, and each time, a sold note followed, which said the buyer took responsibility for any latent defects. The buyers had never read the note.

Judgment

The House of Lords held that a reasonable seller in the circumstances would have had good cause to assume that the buyer agreed to the term, hence rejecting Lord Devlin’s McCutcheon dicta that previous dealings needed to prove actual knowledge.

gollark: Arguably, non-static ones means you just have some supersupergoal with a time-varying output.
gollark: Revise/consider/etc based on *what* though?
gollark: Do humans even *have* goals which we rationally try to long-term-maximize like that?
gollark: Can you not have a *sophont* paperclip maximizer in this universe then?
gollark: Are you just meant to act *as if* they are? Because that doesn't sound very... accurate to reality.

See also

Notes

    References
        This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.