Hemiandrus maculifrons

Hemiandrus maculifrons is a species of ground weta (Hemiandrus Walker, 1869) endemic to New Zealand.[1] They are nocturnal, carnivorous, and flightless orthopterans belonging to the family Anostostomatidae.[1] Being a nocturnal species, individuals remain in tunnels (galleries) during the day and emerge from their burrows after sunset to forage and hunt for small invertebrates.[2] H. maculifrons is one of the smallest New Zealand weta species, averaging 15 mm in length (from the head to the tip of the last abdominal segment, excluding ovipositor in females) and weighing 1–3 g.[3] Unlike the tree weta and tusked weta, where sexual dimorphism is found in the form of male weaponry, ground weta only exhibit sexual size dimorphism: the females are larger than the males.[4]

Hemiandrus maculifrons
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Animalia
Phylum:
Arthropoda
Class:
Insecta
Order:
Orthoptera
Family:
Anostostomatidae
Genus:
Hemiandrus
Species:
H. maculifrons
Binomial name
Hemiandrus maculifrons
Walker, 1869
Synonyms
  • Hemidandrus maori Pictet & Saussure, 1891
  • Zealandosandrus gracilis Salmon, 1950

Morphology

Hemiandrus maculifrons are characterized by a dark brown pronotum and upper abdomen, and a mottled femur.[4] They are small to medium-sized, about 15 mm in length from the head to the tip of the abdomen. This species is very similar in appearance to three other Hemiandrus species found in New Zealand but can be recognized by a relatively long ovipositer in adult females.[5] The head is shiny and brown with a darker shade on top, showing a faint pale dorsal midline. The antennae are longer than the body and the eyes are black. Ground weta are sexually sized dimorphic, with the females larger than males, unlike closely related species.[6][7] Females also have a long, gently curved ovipositor protruding from the end of their abdomen.[4] H. maculifrons has very long legs, the hind femora is 2.8–3.5 times head width.[5] Femora are cream coloured and gradually becoming brown to the tibiae, both femora and tibiae are spotted. Spines are also present, thirteen cream articulated spines on the fore tibiae; seventeen cream articulated spines with brown tips on the mid tibiae; and about thirty to forty-seven spines on the hind tibiae.[5] Fore tibiae also lack tympanum. Adult males are characterised by the presence of bark, sclerotised hooks (falci) underneath the ninth abdominal tergite. Adult females are identified by the shape of subgenital plate and a sclerotised ovipositor.[8]

Distribution and habitat

Hemiandrus maculifrons is widespread in forested parts of South Island New Zealand.[5] In northern South Island H. maculifrons is sympatric with the morphologically very similar species H. luna, H. brucei and H. nox.[5][9] These cryptic species are hosts to the intracellular bacteria Wolbachia, which might explain their speciation without ecological differentiation or geographic separation.[10] Although the species-complex extends across Cook Strait, H. maculifrons is the only one of these cryptic species that is not found in North Island.[5]

They hide during the day in tunnels in the ground (galleries) under moss, soil, leaf litter and rotting logs.[8] Galleries are cavities that can extent up to 10 cm below the surface of the soil or moss, and are usually slightly wider than the weta's body length. When they are constructed under rotting logs, often the log is incorporated into one side of the gallery.[8]

Diet

Hemiandrus maculifrons are primarily predators and scavengers: they usually hunt and forage in forest litter and in trees at night.[2] Both adults and juveniles eat a range of small invertebrates such as beetles, moths, and flies.[2] Interestingly, there is a single case where mountain snow berry (Gaultheria depressa) seeds were found in the frass of a H. maculifrons .[11] This could indicate that this species can be omnivorous.

Breeding

Hemiandrus maculifrons has a non-seasonal life history: adults, young, and eggs can be found at any time of the year. Their food (the small leaf-litter invertebrates) do not change much in abundance over the year in New Zealand forests.[12]

Courtship and copulation

Unlike other singing ensiferans, ground weta do not have tibial tympanae.[13] Sexually active males hit their abdomens on substrates, such as leaf or soil surfaces, to produce pre-copulation vibratory sounds as signals for mate attraction; this is known as drumming.[13] The number of abdomen hits on the substrate, the duration of the drumming, and the intervals between drumming all differ between species, these vibrations are believed to be species specific.[14] Pheromones produced from anal secretions may be involved in long-distance communication.[4][15] After locating a mate, the male and female come into antenna to antenna contact. If the female is accepted by the male, the male then turns to face the same direction as the female and backs under her, or alternatively the female mounts the male. Once underneath the female, the male transports a spermatophore, consisting of a spermatophylax and an ampulla, to the female through genital contact.[8] The spermatophylax is a large, gelatinous substance attached to the ejaculate and sperm containing ampulla.[16] The spermatopylax protects the ampulla from eaten by the female while the sperm and ejaculate are transferred from the ampulla to the female.[17]

Nuptial feeding and post-copulatory guarding

Males of the members of the orthopteran family provide a nuptial gift to the female.[13] The nuptial gift is produced from a gland on the dorsal surface of the male's metanotum, in this case the spermatophylax, and females consume this while the sperms are transferred from the ampulla.[13] The female also bends to eat the ampulla post copulation (while she finished eating the spermatophylax).[13][18] The nuptial gift is considered a mechanism which increases the number of sperm transferred into the female, by delaying the female from removing or eating the ampulla.[13] Studies also show that nuptial gifts provide females with additional resources (amino acids) which the females allocate into their ovaries and eggs, thus increases egg production and egg quality.[18] The males remain with the females after copulation while she consumes the spermatophylax.[13] Post-copulatory guarding is thought to keep rivals males from disrupting insemination.[13]

Oviposition

The female H. maculifrons has a long ovipositor which it uses to insert eggs into her tunnel (gallery) walls.[8] H. maculifrons are not known to exhibit maternal care of eggs or young. Observations of related ground weta species found that females remain in their galleries with the eggs without emerging for several months after oviposition, tending to the nymphs;[13] however, parental care is unusually for ground weta species with long ovipositors.[1][3][8] It may take several days for the females to oviposit a batch of eggs, and the egg incubation period is around 12–18 months. Environmental conditions such as seasonal temperature fluctuations will impact egg development, thus the incubation period.[8]

Taxonomy

Apart from Hemiandrus, Anostostomatidae consists of three other New Zealand genera and about twenty-three other genera from Australia, Africa, South America and New Caledonia. In New Zealand are the tree weta (Hemideina White, 1846), the giant weta (Deinacrida White, 1846), and the tusked weta (Anisoura Ander, 1938, Motuweta Johns, 1997); with the genus Hemiandrus being the most speciose group. Hemiandrus maculifrons is one of the most widespread ground weta species in New Zealand.[5]

Hemiandrus maculifrons was first described by Walker in 1869.[19] In 1997, Johns[19] synonymised two Hemiandrus species H. maori (Pictet & Saussure 1893) and H. gracilis (Salmon 1950) with H. maculifrons. H. maculifrons is a cryptic species complex which comprises multiple species that all look very similar.[5][19] Both specimens used by Pictet and Saussure (1893) and Salmon (1950) for their description appeared to belong to the same species of the H. maculifrons complex which were from the southern-most populations (body length varies from the norther to the southern population with the southern population being the largest).[19] The southern-most species of this complex retained the name H. maculifrons whilst the others were given new names.[5] A morphological and genetic study published in 2016 separated two new species from the specific name H. maculifrons: Hemiandrus luna sp. nov and Hemiandrus brucei sp. nov [5]

gollark: `valgrind` and whatever cannot catch everything. The Linux kernel gets øødles of bugs.
gollark: Most developers, which is why webapps are typically done in a high level language and not C.
gollark: Or, well, with fewer footguns.
gollark: Sure, you can run your C code through random tools, but it's easier to just program in sane languages without footguns.
gollark: My code contains 10515 ~~bugs~~ unintended features per line.

References
  1. Smith, B. L. T. (2015). Evolution of diversity: analysis of species and speciation in Hemiandrus ground wētā: a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Zoology, Massey University, New Zealand (Thesis).
  2. Cary, Paul R. L. (1983). "Diet of the ground weta (Orthoptera: Stenopelmatidae)". New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 10 (3): 295–297. doi:10.1080/03014223.1983.10423918.
  3. Jewell, T. (2007). "Two new species of Hemiandrus (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae) from Fiordland National Park, New Zealand". Zootaxa. 1542 (1): 49–57. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.1542.1.4. ISSN 1175-5334.
  4. Chappell, E. M.; Webb, D. S.; Tonkin, J. D. (2014). "Notes on sexual size dimorphism, sex ratio and movements of adult ground weta Hemiandrus maculifrons (Walker) (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae)". New Zealand Entomologist. 37 (2): 83–92. doi:10.1080/00779962.2013.856377. ISSN 0077-9962.
  5. Taylor-Smith, B. L.; Trewick, S. A.; Morgan-Richards, M. (2016). "Three new ground wētā species and a redescription of Hemiandrus maculifrons". New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 43 (4): 363–383. doi:10.1080/03014223.2016.1205109. ISSN 0301-4223.
  6. Chappell, E. M.; Trewick, S. A.; Morgan-Richards, M. (2012). "Shape and sound reveal genetic cohesion not speciation in the New Zealand orthopteran, Hemiandrus pallitarsis, despite high mitochondrial DNA divergence: intraspecific variation in a ground weta". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 105 (1): 169–186. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01777.x.
  7. van Wyngaarden, F. (1995). "The ecology of the Tekapo ground wētā (Hemiandrus new sp., Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae) and recommendations for the conservation of a threatened close relative". Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  8. Cary, P. R. L. (1981). "The biology of the weta Zealandosandrus gracilis: (Orthoptera: Stenopelmatidae) from the Cass region". Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  9. Chappell, E. M.; Webb, D. S.; Brown, A. J.; Tonkin, J. D. (2015). "A preliminary survey of altitudinal variation in two ground wētā species, Hemiandrus maculifrons (Walker) and Hemiandrus pallitarsis (Walker) (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae)". New Zealand Entomologist. 38 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1080/00779962.2014.922234. ISSN 0077-9962.
  10. Trewick, Steven A.; Wheeler, David; Morgan-Richards, Mary; Bridgeman, Benjamin (2018-04-25). "First detection of Wolbachia in the New Zealand biota". PLOS ONE. 13 (4): e0195517. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195517. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 5918756.
  11. Burns, K. C. (2006). "Weta and the evolution of fleshy fruits in New Zealand" (PDF). New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 30 (3): 405–406.
  12. Brockie, Robert (1992). A living New Zealand Forest. David Bateman.
  13. Gwynne, D. T. (2004). "Reproductive Behavior of Ground Weta (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae): Drumming Behavior, Nuptial Feeding, Post-copulatory Guarding and Maternal Care". Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 77 (4): 414–428. doi:10.2317/E-34.1. ISSN 0022-8567.
  14. Field, L. H. (2001). The Biology of Wetas, King Crickets and their Allies. Wallingford, UK: CABI International. ISBN 0851994083.
  15. Bateman, P. W.; Toms, R. B. (1998). "Mating, Mate Guarding and Male-Male Relative Strength Assessment in an African King Cricket (Orthoptera: Mimnermidae)". Transactions of the American Entomological Society. 124 (1): 69–75. ISSN 0002-8320. JSTOR 25078654.
  16. McCartney, J.; Lehmann, A. W.; Lehmann, G. U. C. (2010). "Lifetime spermatophore investment in natural populations of two closely related bush-cricket species (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Poecilimon )". Behaviour. 147 (3): 285–298. doi:10.1163/000579509X12529331375383. ISSN 0005-7959. JSTOR 40599664.
  17. Gwynne, D. T. (2001). Katydids and bush-crickets : reproductive behavior and evolution of the Tettigoniidae. Ithaca: Comstock Pub. Associates. ISBN 0801436559. OCLC 45230349.
  18. Brown, W. D. (2011). "Allocation of nuptial gifts in tree crickets changes with both male and female diet". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 65 (5): 1007–1014. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1105-y. ISSN 0340-5443.
  19. Johns, P. M. (1997). "The Gondwanaland Weta: Family Anostostomatidae (Formerly in Stenopelmatidae, Henicidae or Mimnermidae): Nomenclatural Problems, World Checklist, New Genera and Species". Journal of Orthoptera Research (6): 125–138. doi:10.2307/3503546. ISSN 1082-6467. JSTOR 3503546.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.