Hellinger distance

In probability and statistics, the Hellinger distance (closely related to, although different from, the Bhattacharyya distance) is used to quantify the similarity between two probability distributions. It is a type of f-divergence. The Hellinger distance is defined in terms of the Hellinger integral, which was introduced by Ernst Hellinger in 1909.[1][2]

Definition

Measure theory

To define the Hellinger distance in terms of measure theory, let P and Q denote two probability measures that are absolutely continuous with respect to a third probability measure λ. The square of the Hellinger distance between P and Q is defined as the quantity

Here, dP / dλ and dQ / dλ are the Radon–Nikodym derivatives of P and Q respectively. This definition does not depend on λ, so the Hellinger distance between P and Q does not change if λ is replaced with a different probability measure with respect to which both P and Q are absolutely continuous. For compactness, the above formula is often written as

Probability theory using Lebesgue measure

To define the Hellinger distance in terms of elementary probability theory, we take λ to be Lebesgue measure, so that dP / dλ and dQ / dλ are simply probability density functions. If we denote the densities as f and g, respectively, the squared Hellinger distance can be expressed as a standard calculus integral

where the second form can be obtained by expanding the square and using the fact that the integral of a probability density over its domain equals 1.

The Hellinger distance H(P, Q) satisfies the property (derivable from the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality)

Discrete distributions

For two discrete probability distributions and , their Hellinger distance is defined as

which is directly related to the Euclidean norm of the difference of the square root vectors, i.e.

Also,

Properties

The Hellinger distance forms a bounded metric on the space of probability distributions over a given probability space.

The maximum distance 1 is achieved when P assigns probability zero to every set to which Q assigns a positive probability, and vice versa.

Sometimes the factor in front of the integral is omitted, in which case the Hellinger distance ranges from zero to the square root of two.

The Hellinger distance is related to the Bhattacharyya coefficient as it can be defined as

Hellinger distances are used in the theory of sequential and asymptotic statistics.[3][4]

The squared Hellinger distance between two normal distributions and is:

The squared Hellinger distance between two multivariate normal distributions and is [5]:

The squared Hellinger distance between two exponential distributions and is:

The squared Hellinger distance between two Weibull distributions and (where is a common shape parameter and are the scale parameters respectively):

The squared Hellinger distance between two Poisson distributions with rate parameters and , so that and , is:

The squared Hellinger distance between two Beta distributions and is:

where is the Beta function.

Connection with total variation distance

The Hellinger distance and the total variation distance (or statistical distance) are related as follows:[6]

These inequalities follow immediately from the inequalities between the 1-norm and the 2-norm.

gollark: What we get in nice Western countries is lots of choices for food basically whenever we want it.
gollark: I keep my immune system healthy by sitting on top of my servers and running prime95.
gollark: You can live without *reliable* food as long as you mostly get some.
gollark: Or you can just photosynthesize.
gollark: Suuuuure you can, for a while.

See also

Notes

  1. Nikulin, M.S. (2001) [1994], "Hellinger distance", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press
  2. Hellinger, Ernst (1909), "Neue Begründung der Theorie quadratischer Formen von unendlichvielen Veränderlichen", Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (in German), 136: 210–271, doi:10.1515/crll.1909.136.210, JFM 40.0393.01
  3. Torgerson, Erik (1991). "Comparison of Statistical Experiments". Encyclopedia of Mathematics. 36. Cambridge University Press.
  4. Liese, Friedrich; Miescke, Klaus-J. (2008). Statistical Decision Theory: Estimation, Testing, and Selection. Springer. ISBN 0-387-73193-8.
  5. Pardo, L. (2006). Statistical Inference Based on Divergence Measures. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC. p. 51. ISBN 1-58488-600-5.
  6. Harsha, Prahladh (September 23, 2011). "Lecture notes on communication complexity" (PDF).

References

  • Yang, Grace Lo; Le Cam, Lucien M. (2000). Asymptotics in Statistics: Some Basic Concepts. Berlin: Springer. ISBN 0-387-95036-2.
  • Vaart, A. W. van der. Asymptotic Statistics (Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-78450-6.
  • Pollard, David E. (2002). A user's guide to measure theoretic probability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-00289-3.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.