Hal Hinson

Hal Hinson is an American film critic who wrote for The Washington Post from 1987 to 1997.[1] As of July 2015 he has 887 reviews collected on the website Rotten Tomatoes. Hinson has been cited as a critic who is unpopular with his fellow critics, as he is not afraid to give a polarized review; for instance, he lauded Hudson Hawk, which was universally panned. Another example is his review for Super Mario Bros., which went against the critical consensus.[2] Hinson wrote an essay on Montgomery Clift, entitled "Some Notes on Method Acting" for Sight & Sound in 1984.[3] He also reviewed for Film Comment in the mid 1980s.[4]

Hal Hinson
Born
United States
OccupationFilm critic, writer

References
  1. "Hal Hinson". LinkedIn. Retrieved October 23, 2017.
  2. Hinson, Hal (May 29, 1993). "'Super Mario Bros.' (PG)". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 29, 2017.
  3. Kurnick, David (December 5, 2011). Empty Houses: Theatrical Failure and the Novel. Princeton University Press. p. 242. ISBN 978-1-4008-4009-0. Retrieved July 19, 2015.
  4. Robson, Eddie (July 31, 2011). Coen Brothers – Virgin Film. Ebury Publishing. p. 322. ISBN 978-0-7535-4770-0. Retrieved July 19, 2015.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.