Hahn series

In mathematics, Hahn series (sometimes also known as Hahn–Mal'cev–Neumann series) are a type of formal infinite series. They are a generalization of Puiseux series (themselves a generalization of formal power series) and were first introduced by Hans Hahn in 1907[1] (and then further generalized by Anatoly Maltsev and Bernhard Neumann to a non-commutative setting). They allow for arbitrary exponents of the indeterminate so long as the set supporting them forms a well-ordered subset of the value group (typically ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} }$ or ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }$). Hahn series were first introduced, as groups, in the course of the proof of the Hahn embedding theorem and then studied by him as fields in his approach to Hilbert's seventeenth problem.

Formulation

The field of Hahn series ${\displaystyle K\left[\left[T^{\Gamma }\right]\right]}$ (in the indeterminate T) over a field K and with value group Γ (an ordered group) is the set of formal expressions of the form

${\displaystyle f=\sum _{e\in \Gamma }c_{e}T^{e}}$

with ${\displaystyle c_{e}\in K}$ such that the support ${\displaystyle \operatorname {supp} f:=\{e\in \Gamma :c_{e}\neq 0\}}$ of f is well-ordered. The sum and product of

${\displaystyle f=\sum _{e\in \Gamma }c_{e}T^{e}}$ and ${\displaystyle g=\sum _{e\in \Gamma }d_{e}T^{e}}$

are given by

${\displaystyle f+g=\sum _{e\in \Gamma }(c_{e}+d_{e})T^{e}}$

and

${\displaystyle fg=\sum _{e\in \Gamma }\sum _{e'+e''=e}c_{e'}d_{e''}T^{e}}$

(in the latter, the sum ${\displaystyle \sum _{e'+e''=e}\cdot }$ over values ${\displaystyle (e',e'')}$ such that ${\displaystyle c_{e'}\neq 0}$ and ${\displaystyle d_{e''}\neq 0}$ is finite because a well-ordered set cannot contain an infinite decreasing sequence).

For example, ${\displaystyle T^{-1/p}+T^{-1/p^{2}}+T^{-1/p^{3}}+\cdots }$ is a Hahn series (over any field) because the set of rationals

${\displaystyle \left\{-{\frac {1}{p}},-{\frac {1}{p^{2}}},-{\frac {1}{p^{3}}},\ldots \right\}}$

is well-ordered; it is not a Puiseux series because the denominators in the exponents are unbounded. (And if the base field K has characteristic p, then this Hahn series satisfies the equation ${\displaystyle X^{p}-X=T^{-1}}$ so it is algebraic over ${\displaystyle K(T)}$.)

Properties

Properties of the valued field

The valuation ${\displaystyle v(f)}$ of a non zero Hahn series

${\displaystyle f=\sum _{e\in \Gamma }c_{e}T^{e}}$

is defined as the smallest ${\displaystyle e\in \Gamma }$ such that ${\displaystyle c_{e}\neq 0}$ (in other words, the smallest element of the support of ${\displaystyle f}$): this makes ${\displaystyle K[[T^{\Gamma }]]}$ into a spherically complete valued field with value group ${\displaystyle \Gamma }$ and residue field ${\displaystyle K}$ (justifying a posteriori the terminology). In fact, if ${\displaystyle K}$ has characteristic zero, then ${\displaystyle (K[[T^{\Gamma }]],v)}$ is up to (non unique) isomorphism the only spherically complete valued field with residue field ${\displaystyle K}$ and value group ${\displaystyle \Gamma }$[2]. The valuation ${\displaystyle v}$ defines a topology on ${\displaystyle K\left[\left[T^{\Gamma }\right]\right]}$. If ${\displaystyle \Gamma \subseteq \mathbb {R} }$, then v corresponds to an ultrametric absolute value ${\displaystyle |f|=\exp(-v(f))}$, with respect to which ${\displaystyle K\left[\left[T^{\Gamma }\right]\right]}$ is a complete metric space. However, unlike in the case of formal Laurent series or Puiseux series, the formal sums used in defining the elements of the field do not converge: in the case of ${\displaystyle T^{-1/p}+T^{-1/p^{2}}+T^{-1/p^{3}}+\cdots }$ for example, the absolute values of the terms tend to 1 (because their valuations tend to 0), so the series is not convergent (such series are sometimes known as "pseudo-convergent"[3]).

Algebraic properties

If K is algebraically closed (but not necessarily of characteristic zero) and Γ is divisible, then ${\displaystyle K\left[\left[T^{\Gamma }\right]\right]}$ is algebraically closed.[4] Thus, the algebraic closure of ${\displaystyle K((T))}$ is contained in ${\displaystyle {\overline {K}}[[T^{\mathbb {Q} }]]}$, where ${\displaystyle {\overline {K}}}$ is the algebraic closure of ${\displaystyle K}$ (when K is of characteristic zero, it is exactly the field of Puiseux series): in fact, it is possible to give a somewhat analogous description of the algebraic closure of ${\displaystyle K((T))}$ in positive characteristic as a subset of ${\displaystyle K\left[\left[T^{\Gamma }\right]\right]}$.[5]

If K is an ordered field then ${\displaystyle K\left[\left[T^{\Gamma }\right]\right]}$ is totally ordered by making the indeterminate T infinitesimal (greater than 0 but less than any positive element of K) or, equivalently, by using the lexicographic order on the coefficients of the series. If K is real-closed and Γ is divisible then ${\displaystyle K\left[\left[T^{\Gamma }\right]\right]}$ is itself real closed.[6] This fact can be used to analyse (or even construct) the field of surreal numbers (which is isomorphic, as an ordered field, to the field of Hahn series with real coefficients and value group the surreal numbers themselves[7]).

If κ is an infinite regular cardinal, one can consider the subset of ${\displaystyle K\left[\left[T^{\Gamma }\right]\right]}$ consisting of series whose support set ${\displaystyle \{e\in \Gamma :c_{e}\neq 0\}}$ has cardinality (strictly) less than κ: it turns out that this is also a field, with much the same algebraic closedness properties as the full ${\displaystyle K\left[\left[T^{\Gamma }\right]\right]}$: e.g., it is algebraically closed or real closed when K is so and Γ is divisible.[8]

Summable families

Summable families

One can define a notion of summable families in ${\displaystyle K\left[\left[T^{\Gamma }\right]\right]}$. If ${\displaystyle I}$ is a set and ${\displaystyle (f_{i})_{i\in I}}$ is a family of Hahn series ${\displaystyle f_{i}\in K\left[\left[T^{\Gamma }\right]\right]}$, then we say that ${\displaystyle (f_{i})_{i\in I}}$ is summable if the set ${\displaystyle \bigcup \limits _{i\in I}\operatorname {supp} f_{i}\subset \Gamma }$ is well-ordered, and each set ${\displaystyle \{i\in I\ |\ e\in \Gamma \}}$ for ${\displaystyle e\in \Gamma }$ is finite.

We may then define the sum ${\displaystyle \sum \limits _{i\in I}f_{i}}$ as the Hahn series

${\displaystyle \sum \limits _{i\in I}f_{i}:=\sum \limits _{e\in \Gamma }(\sum \limits _{i\in I}f_{i}(e))T^{e}}$

.

If ${\displaystyle (f_{i})_{i\in I},(g_{i})_{i\in I}}$ are summable, then so are the families ${\displaystyle (f_{i}+g_{i})_{i\in I},(f_{i}g_{j})_{(i,j)\in I\times I}}$, and we have[9]

${\displaystyle \sum \limits _{i\in I}f_{i}+g_{i}=\sum \limits _{i\in I}f_{i}+\sum \limits _{i\in I}g_{i}}$

and

${\displaystyle \sum \limits _{(i,j)\in I\times I}f_{i}g_{j}=(\sum \limits _{i\in I}f_{i})(\sum \limits _{i\in I}g_{i})}$

.

This notion of summable family does not correspond to the notion of convergence in the valuation topology on ${\displaystyle K\left[\left[T^{\Gamma }\right]\right]}$. For instance, in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} \left[\left[T^{\mathbb {Q} }\right]\right]}$, the family ${\displaystyle (T^{\frac {n}{n+1}}+T^{n+1})_{n\in \mathbb {N} }}$ is summable but the sequence ${\displaystyle (\sum \limits _{k\leq n}T^{\frac {k}{k+1}}+T^{k+1})_{n\in \mathbb {N} }}$ does not converge.

Evaluating analytic functions

Let ${\displaystyle a\in \mathbb {R} }$< and let ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}_{a}}$ denote the ring of real-valued functions which are analytic on a neighborhood of ${\displaystyle a}$.

If ${\displaystyle K}$ contains ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }$, then we can evaluate every element ${\displaystyle f}$ of ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}_{a}}$ at every element of ${\displaystyle K\left[\left[T^{\Gamma }\right]\right]}$ of the form ${\displaystyle a+\varepsilon }$, where the valuation of ${\displaystyle \varepsilon }$ is strictly positive. Indeed, the family ${\displaystyle ({\frac {f^{(n)}(a)}{n!}}\varepsilon ^{n})_{n\in \mathbb {N} }}$ is always summable[10], so we can define ${\displaystyle f(a+\varepsilon ):=\sum \limits _{n\in \mathbb {N} }{\frac {f^{(n)}(a)}{n!}}\varepsilon ^{n}}$. This defines a ring morphism ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}_{a}\longrightarrow K\left[\left[T^{\Gamma }\right]\right]}$.

Hahn–Witt series

The construction of Hahn series can be combined with Witt vectors (at least over a perfect field) to form twisted Hahn series or Hahn–Witt series:[11] for example, over a finite field K of characteristic p (or their algebraic closure), the field of Hahn–Witt series with value group Γ (containing the integers) would be the set of formal sums ${\displaystyle \sum _{e\in \Gamma }c_{e}p^{e}}$ where now ${\displaystyle c_{e}}$ are Teichmüller representatives (of the elements of K) which are multiplied and added in the same way as in the case of ordinary Witt vectors (which is obtained when Γ is the group of integers). When Γ is the group of rationals or reals and K is the algebraic closure of the finite field with p elements, this construction gives a (ultra)metrically complete algebraically closed field containing the p-adics, hence a more or less explicit description of the field ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} _{p}}$ or its spherical completion.[12]

Examples

• The field ${\displaystyle K((T))}$ of formal Laurent series over ${\displaystyle K}$ can be described as ${\displaystyle K[[T^{\mathbb {Z} }]]}$.
• The field of surreal numbers can be regarded as a field of Hahn series with real coefficients and value group the surreal numbers themselves.[13]
• The Levi-Civita field can be regarded as a subfield of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} [[T^{\mathbb {Q} }]]}$, with the additional imposition that the coefficients be a left-finite set: the set of coefficients less than a given coefficient ${\displaystyle c_{q}}$ is finite.
• The field of transseries ${\displaystyle \mathbb {T} }$ is a directed union of Hahn fields (and is an extension of the Levi-Civita field). The construction of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {T} }$ resembles (but is not literally) ${\displaystyle T_{0}=\mathbb {R} }$, ${\displaystyle T_{n+1}=\mathbb {R} \left[\left[\varepsilon ^{T_{n}}\right]\right]}$.

See also

• Rational series

Notes

1. Hahn (1907)
2. Kaplansky, Irving, Maximal fields with valuation, Duke Mathematical Journal, vol. 1, n°2, 1942.
3. Kaplansky (1942, Duke Math. J., definition on p.303)
4. MacLane (1939, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., theorem 1 (p.889))
5. Kedlaya (2001, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.)
6. Alling (1987, §6.23, (2) (p.218))
7. Alling (1987, theorem of §6.55 (p. 246))
8. Alling (1987, §6.23, (3) and (4) (p.218–219))
9. Joris van der Hoeven
10. Neumann
11. Kedlaya (2001, J. Number Theory)
12. Poonen (1993)
13. Alling (1987)

References

• Hahn, Hans (1907), "Über die nichtarchimedischen Größensysteme", Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, Mathematisch - Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse (Wien. Ber.), 116: 601–655, JFM 38.0501.01 (reprinted in: Hahn, Hans (1995), Gesammelte Abhandlungen I, Springer-Verlag)
• MacLane, Saunders (1939), "The universality of formal power series fields", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 45: 888–890, doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1939-07110-3, Zbl 0022.30401
• Kaplansky, Irving (1942), "Maximal fields with valuations I", Duke Mathematical Journal, 9: 303–321, doi:10.1215/s0012-7094-42-00922-0
• Alling, Norman L. (1987). Foundations of Analysis over Surreal Number Fields. Mathematics Studies. 141. North-Holland. ISBN 0-444-70226-1. Zbl 0621.12001.
• Poonen, Bjorn (1993), "Maximally complete fields", L'Enseignement mathématique, 39: 87–106, Zbl 0807.12006
• Kedlaya, Kiran Sridhara (2001), "The algebraic closure of the power series field in positive characteristic", Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 129: 3461–3470, doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-01-06001-4
• Kedlaya, Kiran Sridhara (2001), "Power series and 𝑝-adic algebraic closures", Journal of Number Theory, 89: 324–339, arXiv:math/9906030, doi:10.1006/jnth.2000.2630
• Hoeven, van der, Joris (2001), "Operators on generalized power series", Illinois Journal of Mathematics, 45, doi:10.1215/ijm/1258138061
• Neumann, Bernhard Hermann (1949), "On ordered division rings", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 66: 202–252