Guigues III of Albon

Guigues the Old, count of Albon, called Guigues III (b 1050/1060 d 1125) was a Count of Albon from 1079, when the County of Vienne, then in the possession of the Archdiocese of Vienne, was divided between him and Humbert I of Savoy, who received Maurienne.

Guigues III of Albon
BornBetween 1050 and 1060
Died21 December 1133
France
Spouse(s)Matilda
FatherGuigues II d'Albon
MotherPetronel of Turin

He was the son of Guigues II d'Albon and Petronille. There is no source which records her parents or ancestry. His ancestors were lords of the castle of Albon and counts (comites) in the Grésivaudan and Briançonnais.

Guigues's reign was marked by continual strife with Hugh of Châteauneuf, Bishop of Grenoble, over the suzerainty of certain church lands in the Grésivaudan. Hugh accused the count of usurping the lands with the help of the Bishop Mallem and invented fantastic stories to back up his claim to the disputed estates. Finally an accord was signed between Guigues and the bishop in 1099. Guigues returned the ecclesiastic land, while Hugh recognised the authority of the count in the vicinity of Grenoble.

In 1095, Guigues contracted an exemplary marriage with the high-born Matilda, long thought to be the daughter of Edgar the Aetheling, but now thought more likely to have been a daughter of Roger I of Sicily, the Great Count, and his third wife, Adelaide del Vasto.

In 1129, Guigues benefited further from the division of the Viennois between himself and Amadeus III of Savoy. Four years later, he died, leaving as his heir Guigues IV "dauphin" (died 28 June 1142) and a second son, Humbert, Archbishop of Vienne (died 26 June 1147). He had a third son Guigues "the elder" who was living in 1105 and died young. He had three daughters:

Sources

  • Moriarty, G. Andrews. "Mathilda, Wife of Guigues VIII, Count of Albon", The New England Historical and Genealogical Register volume CXI (October 1957).
gollark: It's really just a bad operator which should be apiodeleted.
gollark: Yes, let alone `is not`.
gollark: Python's == is also nontransistive in some situations, though.
gollark: Ugh. Yes.
gollark: `is` tests object identity (in CPython, "same memory location") or something and not, well, actual equality, so it's just bizarre and esoteric and does *not* need its own operators.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.