Gottlob Ernst Schulze

Gottlob Ernst Schulze (German: [ˈʃʊltsə]; 23 August 1761 – 14 January 1833) was a German philosopher, born in Heldrungen (modern-day Thuringia, Germany). He was the grandfather of the pioneering biochemist Ernst Schulze.

Gottlob Ernst Schulze
Born23 August 1761
Died14 January 1833
Alma materUniversity of Wittenberg
Era18th-century philosophy
RegionWestern philosophy
SchoolGerman idealism
German skepticism
InstitutionsUniversity of Wittenberg
University of Helmstedt
University of Göttingen
Main interests
Epistemology
Notable ideas
Hume's skepticism about induction was not disproved by Kant's Critique of Pure Reason

Biography

Schulze was a professor at Wittenberg, Helmstedt, and Göttingen.[1] His most influential book was Aenesidemus (1792), a skeptical polemic against Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason and Karl Leonhard Reinhold's Philosophy of the Elements.

In Göttingen, he advised his student Arthur Schopenhauer to concentrate on the philosophies of Plato and Kant. This advice had a strong influence on Schopenhauer's philosophy. In the winter semester of 1810 and 1811, Schopenhauer studied both psychology and metaphysics under Schulze.[2]

Schulze died in Göttingen.

Quotes

  • "As determined by the Critique of Pure Reason, the function of the principle of causality thus undercuts all philosophizing about the where or how of the origin of our cognitions. All assertions on the matter, and every conclusion drawn from them, become empty subtleties, for once we accept that determination of the principle as our rule of thought, we could never ask, "Does anything actually exist which is the ground and cause of our representations?". We can only ask, "How must the understanding join these representations together, in keeping with the pre-determined functions of its activity, in order to gather them as one experience?"[3]
gollark: Probably.
gollark: If you use sufficiently complex methods to choose boxes, the simulator has to basically simulate the entire universe and thus the simulation is basically "real" (depending on your philosophical outlook).
gollark: You don't pick B, you pick either just A or A+B.
gollark: But, considering only somehow "real" universes, your choice after the boxes are filled can't affect the contents and it's "strictly better" to take both, as this provides more money than taking one. But everyone who does this gets less money than the oneboxer people due to them being predicted as doing that. Thus paradox.
gollark: The osmarks.tk™ superintelligent AI will be programmed to kill LyricLy and only LyricLy due to this.

References

  1. Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 7, New York: Macmillan, 1972.
  2. Arthur Schopenhauer, Manuscript Remains, Vol. 2, Berg, 1988, ISBN 0-85496-539-4.
  3. Di Giovanni, George, and H. S. Harris (eds.), Between Kant and Hegel, Indianapolis: Hackett, 2000, p. 131, ISBN 0-87220-504-5 (original quote from: Gottlob Ernst Schulze, Aenesidemus, 1792, pp. 176–7).
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.