Generalized Verma module

In mathematics, generalized Verma modules are a generalization of a (true) Verma module,[1] and are objects in the representation theory of Lie algebras. They were studied originally by James Lepowsky in the 1970s. The motivation for their study is that their homomorphisms correspond to invariant differential operators over generalized flag manifolds. The study of these operators is an important part of the theory of parabolic geometries.

Definition

Let ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}}$ be a semisimple Lie algebra and ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}}$ a parabolic subalgebra of ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}}$. For any irreducible finite-dimensional representation ${\displaystyle V}$ of ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}}$ we define the generalized Verma module to be the relative tensor product

${\displaystyle M_{\mathfrak {p}}(V):={\mathcal {U}}({\mathfrak {g}})\otimes _{{\mathcal {U}}({\mathfrak {p}})}V}$.

The action of ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}}$ is left multiplication in ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {U}}({\mathfrak {g}})}$.

If λ is the highest weight of V, we sometimes denote the Verma module by ${\displaystyle M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\lambda )}$.

Note that ${\displaystyle M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\lambda )}$ makes sense only for ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}}$-dominant and ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}}$-integral weights (see weight) ${\displaystyle \lambda }$.

It is well known that a parabolic subalgebra ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}}$ of ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}}$ determines a unique grading ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}=\oplus _{j=-k}^{k}{\mathfrak {g}}_{j}}$ so that ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}=\oplus _{j\geq 0}{\mathfrak {g}}_{j}}$. Let ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}_{-}:=\oplus _{j<0}{\mathfrak {g}}_{j}}$. It follows from the Poincaré–Birkhoff–Witt theorem that, as a vector space (and even as a ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}_{-}}$-module and as a ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}_{0}}$-module),

${\displaystyle M_{\mathfrak {p}}(V)\simeq {\mathcal {U}}({\mathfrak {g}}_{-})\otimes V}$.

In further text, we will denote a generalized Verma module simply by GVM.

Properties of GVMs

GVM's are highest weight modules and their highest weight λ is the highest weight of the representation V. If ${\displaystyle v_{\lambda }}$ is the highest weight vector in V, then ${\displaystyle 1\otimes v_{\lambda }}$ is the highest weight vector in ${\displaystyle M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\lambda )}$.

GVM's are weight modules, i.e. they are direct sum of its weight spaces and these weight spaces are finite-dimensional.

As all highest weight modules, GVM's are quotients of Verma modules. The kernel of the projection ${\displaystyle M_{\lambda }\to M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\lambda )}$ is

${\displaystyle (1)\quad K_{\lambda }:=\sum _{\alpha \in S}M_{s_{\alpha }\cdot \lambda }\subset M_{\lambda }}$

where ${\displaystyle S\subset \Delta }$ is the set of those simple roots α such that the negative root spaces of root ${\displaystyle -\alpha }$ are in ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}}$ (the set S determines uniquely the subalgebra ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}}$), ${\displaystyle s_{\alpha }}$ is the root reflection with respect to the root α and ${\displaystyle s_{\alpha }\cdot \lambda }$ is the affine action of ${\displaystyle s_{\alpha }}$ on λ. It follows from the theory of (true) Verma modules that ${\displaystyle M_{s_{\alpha }\cdot \lambda }}$ is isomorphic to a unique submodule of ${\displaystyle M_{\lambda }}$. In (1), we identified ${\displaystyle M_{s_{\alpha }\cdot \lambda }\subset M_{\lambda }}$. The sum in (1) is not direct.

In the special case when ${\displaystyle S=\emptyset }$, the parabolic subalgebra ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}}$ is the Borel subalgebra and the GVM coincides with (true) Verma module. In the other extremal case when ${\displaystyle S=\Delta }$, ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}={\mathfrak {g}}}$ and the GVM is isomorphic to the inducing representation V.

The GVM ${\displaystyle M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\lambda )}$ is called regular, if its highest weight λ is on the affine Weyl orbit of a dominant weight ${\displaystyle {\tilde {\lambda }}}$. In other word, there exist an element w of the Weyl group W such that

${\displaystyle \lambda =w\cdot {\tilde {\lambda }}}$

where ${\displaystyle \cdot }$ is the affine action of the Weyl group.

The Verma module ${\displaystyle M_{\lambda }}$ is called singular, if there is no dominant weight on the affine orbit of λ. In this case, there exists a weight ${\displaystyle {\tilde {\lambda }}}$ so that ${\displaystyle {\tilde {\lambda }}+\delta }$ is on the wall of the fundamental Weyl chamber (δ is the sum of all fundamental weights).

Homomorphisms of GVMs

By a homomorphism of GVMs we mean ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}}$-homomorphism.

For any two weights ${\displaystyle \lambda ,\mu }$ a homomorphism

${\displaystyle M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\mu )\rightarrow M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\lambda )}$

may exist only if ${\displaystyle \mu }$ and ${\displaystyle \lambda }$ are linked with an affine action of the Weyl group ${\displaystyle W}$ of the Lie algebra ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}}$. This follows easily from the Harish-Chandra theorem on infinitesimal central characters.

Unlike in the case of (true) Verma modules, the homomorphisms of GVM's are in general not injective and the dimension

${\displaystyle dim(Hom(M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\mu ),M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\lambda )))}$

may be larger than one in some specific cases.

If ${\displaystyle f:M_{\mu }\to M_{\lambda }}$ is a homomorphism of (true) Verma modules, ${\displaystyle K_{\mu }}$ resp. ${\displaystyle K_{\lambda }}$ is the kernels of the projection ${\displaystyle M_{\mu }\to M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\mu )}$, resp. ${\displaystyle M_{\lambda }\to M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\lambda )}$, then there exists a homomorphism ${\displaystyle K_{\mu }\to K_{\lambda }}$ and f factors to a homomorphism of generalized Verma modules ${\displaystyle M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\mu )\to M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\lambda )}$. Such a homomorphism (that is a factor of a homomorphism of Verma modules) is called standard. However, the standard homomorphism may be zero in some cases.

Standard

Let us suppose that there exists a nontrivial homomorphism of true Verma moduls ${\displaystyle M_{\mu }\to M_{\lambda }}$. Let ${\displaystyle S\subset \Delta }$ be the set of those simple roots α such that the negative root spaces of root ${\displaystyle -\alpha }$ are in ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}}$ (like in section Properties). The following theorem is proved by Lepowsky:[2]

The standard homomorphism ${\displaystyle M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\mu )\to M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\lambda )}$ is zero if and only if there exists ${\displaystyle \alpha \in S}$ such that ${\displaystyle M_{\mu }}$ is isomorphic to a submodule of ${\displaystyle M_{s_{\alpha }\cdot \lambda }}$ (${\displaystyle s_{\alpha }}$ is the corresponding root reflection and ${\displaystyle \cdot }$ is the affine action).

The structure of GVMs on the affine orbit of a ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}}$-dominant and ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}}$-integral weight ${\displaystyle {\tilde {\lambda }}}$ can be described explicitly. If W is the Weyl group of ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {g}}}$, there exists a subset ${\displaystyle W^{\mathfrak {p}}\subset W}$ of such elements, so that ${\displaystyle w\in W^{\mathfrak {p}}\Leftrightarrow w({\tilde {\lambda }})}$ is ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}}$-dominant. It can be shown that ${\displaystyle W^{\mathfrak {p}}\simeq W_{\mathfrak {p}}\backslash W}$ where ${\displaystyle W_{\mathfrak {p}}}$ is the Weyl group of ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}}$ (in particular, ${\displaystyle W^{\mathfrak {p}}}$ does not depend on the choice of ${\displaystyle {\tilde {\lambda }}}$). The map ${\displaystyle w\in W^{\mathfrak {p}}\mapsto M_{\mathfrak {p}}(w\cdot {\tilde {\lambda }})}$ is a bijection between ${\displaystyle W^{\mathfrak {p}}}$ and the set of GVM's with highest weights on the affine orbit of ${\displaystyle {\tilde {\lambda }}}$. Let as suppose that ${\displaystyle \mu =w'\cdot {\tilde {\lambda }}}$, ${\displaystyle \lambda =w\cdot {\tilde {\lambda }}}$ and ${\displaystyle w\leq w'}$ in the Bruhat ordering (otherwise, there is no homomorphism of (true) Verma modules ${\displaystyle M_{\mu }\to M_{\lambda }}$ and the standard homomorphism does not make sense, see Homomorphisms of Verma modules).

The following statements follow from the above theorem and the structure of ${\displaystyle W^{\mathfrak {p}}}$:

Theorem. If ${\displaystyle w'=s_{\gamma }w}$ for some positive root ${\displaystyle \gamma }$ and the length (see Bruhat ordering) l(w')=l(w)+1, then there exists a nonzero standard homomorphism ${\displaystyle M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\mu )\to M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\lambda )}$.

Theorem. The standard homomorphism ${\displaystyle M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\mu )\to M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\lambda )}$ is zero if and only if there exists ${\displaystyle w''\in W}$ such that ${\displaystyle w\leq w''\leq w'}$ and ${\displaystyle w''\notin W^{\mathfrak {p}}}$.

However, if ${\displaystyle {\tilde {\lambda }}}$ is only dominant but not integral, there may still exist ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}}$-dominant and ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {p}}}$-integral weights on its affine orbit.

The situation is even more complicated if the GVM's have singular character, i.e. there ${\displaystyle \mu }$ and ${\displaystyle \lambda }$ are on the affine orbit of some ${\displaystyle {\tilde {\lambda }}}$ such that ${\displaystyle {\tilde {\lambda }}+\delta }$ is on the wall of the fundamental Weyl chamber.

Nonstandard

A homomorphism ${\displaystyle M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\mu )\to M_{\mathfrak {p}}(\lambda )}$ is called nonstandard, if it is not standard. It may happen that the standard homomorphism of GVMs is zero but there still exists a nonstandard homomorphism.

Bernstein–Gelfand–Gelfand resolution

Examples

• The fields of conformal field theory belong to generalized Verma modules of the conformal algebra.[3]

See also

• Verma module
• Parabolic geometry

External links

• Code for constructing the BGG resolution of Lie algebra modules and computing its cohomology

References

1. Named after Daya-Nand Verma.
2. Lepowsky J., A generalization of the Bernstein-Gelfand-Gelfand resolution, J. Algebra, 49 (1977), 496-511.
3. Penedones, João; Trevisani, Emilio; Yamazaki, Masahito (2016). "Recursion relations for conformal blocks". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2016 (9). doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2016)070. ISSN 1029-8479.