Gareth Knapman

Gareth Knapman (born 4 March 1981 Birmingham, England, died 4 May 2016 Leipzig, Germany) was an English theatre actor and director, and a founding director of Ubiquity Theatre Company.

Career

Directly after finishing training at Birmingham (UK)'s Stage2 Theatre Company and getting his LAMDA acting diploma with honours, Gareth jobbed as an actor; director and workshop leader mainly in the West Midlands of the UK. Companies he worked for include Gazebo Theatre; Bigfoot Theatre; Loud-Mouth Theatre; Purple Monster; EIL and Geese Theatre Company.

In 2003, he set up Ubiquity Theatre Company with theatre producer Ruth Harrell which has since become an important and innovative producer of performances and workshop programmes with an aim of 'enabling our audience to question and re-evaluate the social problems they encounter in their everyday lives' (Ubiquity website). Ubiquity's first venue-based performance was a stage-adaption of the 1985 Brat Pack film The Breakfast Club in Birmingham's Patrick Centre in the Birmingham Hippodrome. Subsequent performance projects have included re-workings of classic texts such as William Shakespeare's The Tempest; The Importance of Being Earnest by Oscar Wilde and The Dumb Waiter by Harold Pinter along with devised productions including Nomad No More in Leipzig, Germany and Heads Above Feet for Wolverhampton City Council.

Internationally, Gareth and Ubiquity worked from 2002 to 2003 in Vermont (USA) to direct and produce new pieces of theatre with groups of international actors (with funding from the Experiment In International Living). Gareth took sole control of Ubiquity in August 2004 and took it to Birmingham's partner-city of Leipzig (Germany) in early 2005, where they are now permanently based.

Compiled and written by biomakers.com with thanks to Mike & Roofy for their subject knowledge and research skills.

Sources
gollark: Anyway, I think if you use standard and generally-considered-good cryptographic algorithms with trusted open-source implementations you're probably okay. Unless you're being actively, personally targeted by nation-states. In which case you have bigger problems.
gollark: Like I said, they can't practically ban strong encryption, just make it so that the average people's communications don't use it.
gollark: Then, anyone who uses strong crypto can be called an evil terrorist because all Good Citizens are using backdoored stuff.
gollark: Basically, the plan seems to be more to not ban encryption but just backdoor popular messaging services because TeRRoRiSm and ChIlDren.
gollark: On the outlawing encryption thing: not *really*, but it's pretty bad too.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.