Galagete darwini

Galagete darwini is a moth in the family Autostichidae. It was described by Bernard Landry in 2002. It is found on the Galápagos Islands.[1]

Galagete darwini
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Animalia
Phylum:
Arthropoda
Class:
Insecta
Order:
Lepidoptera
Family:
Autostichidae
Genus:
Galagete
Species:
G. darwini
Binomial name
Galagete darwini
Landry, 2002

The wingspan is 7-8.5 mm for males and 7–9 mm for females. The forewings are whitish beige to pale orange brown, with scattered darker brown scales. There are dark-brown to greyish-brown markings in the form of a large basal triangle interrupted near the middle by small paler spot, a medium-sized spot along the costa at about one-third sometimes enclosing a darker and smaller subcostal spot, a costal line between the basal triangle and the costal spot at one-third, a small spot at two-fifth along the midline, a dark medium-sized spot along the cubital fold at about one-third sometimes connected to a rather large but paler area along the inner margin, a good-sized usually greyish-brown costal spot at three-fifths sometimes connected to a small dark-brown spot below near the middle, the latter sometimes connected to the inner margin by more brown scales, the apical one-fifth mostly greyish brown, sometimes with scattered paler scales and sometimes with a series of small spots terminally along the apex and outer margin. The hindwings are pale greyish brown. Adults are on wing from January to May and again from September to December.

The larvae feed on the dead leaves and/or branches of Scalesia baurii.

Etymology

The species is named in honour of the founders and staff of the Charles Darwin Foundation for the Galápagos Islands.[2]

gollark: - They may be working on them, but they initially claimed that they weren't necessary and they don't exist now. Also, I don't trust them to not do them wrong.- Ooookay then- Well, generics, for one: they *kind of exist* in that you can have generic maps, channels, slices, and arrays, but not anything else. Also this (https://fasterthanli.me/blog/2020/i-want-off-mr-golangs-wild-ride/), which is mostly about the file handling not being good since it tries to map on concepts which don't fit. Also channels having weird special syntax. Also `for` and `range` and `new` and `make` basically just being magic stuff which do whatever the compiler writers wanted with no consistency- see above- Because there's no generic number/comparable thing type. You would need to use `interface{}` or write a new function (with identical code) for every type you wanted to compare- You can change a signature somewhere and won't be alerted, but something else will break because the interface is no longer implemented- They are byte sequences. https://blog.golang.org/strings.- It's not. You need to put `if err != nil { return err }` everywhere.
gollark: Oh, and the error handling is terrible and it's kind of the type system's fault.
gollark: If I remember right Go strings are just byte sequences with no guarantee of being valid UTF-8, but all the functions working on them just assume they are.
gollark: Oh, and the strings are terrible.
gollark: Also, channels are not a particularly good primitive for synchronization.

References
  1. Savela, Markku. "Galagete Landry, 2002". Lepidoptera and Some Other Life Forms. Retrieved November 19, 2017.
  2. Revue suisse de Zoologie 109 (4)


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.