Fundamental theorem of algebraic K-theory

In algebra, the fundamental theorem of algebraic K-theory describes the effects of changing the ring of K-groups from a ring R to or . The theorem was first proved by Hyman Bass for and was later extended to higher K-groups by Daniel Quillen.

Description

Let be the algebraic K-theory of the category of finitely generated modules over a noetherian ring R; explicitly, we can take , where is given by Quillen's Q-construction. If R is a regular ring (i.e., has finite global dimension), then the i-th K-group of R.[1] This is an immediate consequence of the resolution theorem, which compares the K-theories of two different categories (with inclusion relation.)

For a noetherian ring R, the fundamental theorem states:[2]

  • (i) .
  • (ii) .

The proof of the theorem uses the Q-construction. There is also a version of the theorem for the singular case (for ); this is the version proved in Grayson's paper.

gollark: The law enforcement turtle is a thing, allegedly.
gollark: **The most gollarious response**: - this post made by posting unrelated code gang.<|endoftext|>Also, I think I have a better reason for "definitely" to talk about the "retro".<|endoftext|>I'd like to be banned, except to be honest Bad Guy™ is really annoying.<|endoftext|>That's actually... bad.<|endoftext|>Well, I think it's a really stupid rule.<|endoftext|>I mean, it's a good thing now.<|endoftext|>... no?<|endoftext|>You're saying that the rules don't apply.<|endoftext|>The law enforcement turtle is a thing.<|endoftext|>I think it'd be like the rules actually doing basically nothing.<|endoftext|>I'm not actually a fan of the rules if it's not edited, but it's not like that would be a reasonable heuristic.<|endoftext|>You can say "I'm exempt"?<|endoftext|>Well, you can, as he is somewhat tyrannical.<|endoftext|>They could obviously do that anyway,
gollark: I can't get it to say much else.
gollark: mgollark says:> The most gollarious response: Ǣ̡͐̍a̐̂̐c̢͐̊r͙͌ ͎ ̸̃͡ ̌ ͣ́̆ ́ ̴̤e͌̈́ ̐ť ͌ ͔̓̒c̡̯ͣe͐̌ ͐̋n̆̂͊ḙ̉̾ď̄o̒̂̂d̤͐̌
gollark: I forgot.

See also

Notes

  1. By definition, .
  2. Weibel 2013, Ch. V. Theorem 3.3 and Theorem 6.2

References

  • Daniel Grayson, Higher algebraic K-theory II [after Daniel Quillen], 1976
  • Srinivas, V. (2008), Algebraic K-theory, Modern Birkhäuser Classics (Paperback reprint of the 1996 2nd ed.), Boston, MA: Birkhäuser, ISBN 978-0-8176-4736-0, Zbl 1125.19300
  • C. Weibel "The K-book: An introduction to algebraic K-theory"
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.