Freeform surface machining

Freeform surface or complex surfaces are widely manufactured nowadays. The industries which most often manufactures free-form surfaces are basically aerospace, automotive, die mold industries, bio medical and power sector for turbine blades manufacturing. Generally 3 or 5 axis CNC milling machine is used for this purpose. The manufacturing process of free form surface is not an easy job as the tool path generation in present CAM technology is generally based on geometric computation so tool path are not optimum. The geometry can also be not described explicitly so errors and discontinuities occurrence in the solid structure cannot be avoided. Free-form surfaces are machined with the help of different tool path generation method like adaptive iso-planar tool path generation, constant scallop tool path generation, adaptive iso-parametric method, iso-curvature, isophote and by other methods. The different methods are chosen based on the parameters which is needed to be optimized.[1][2]

FREE-FORM SURFACE MILLING

Different tool path generation methods
  1. Iso-planar tool path method: This is the most common and robust method used to machine free-form surface. In this process tool path generation is done by intersection of surfaces with parallel plane in Cartesian space.
  2. Adaptive iso-planar tool path method: In this process the surface are partitioned into different regions according to their slope with the intersection planes by applying the concept of isophote.
  3. Iso-scallop method: Scallop generated between two adjacent machining path is constant.[3][4]

Optimization of free-form surface machining

CAM software generally creates a tool path without considering any mechanics process. These causes risk of tool damage, tool deflection and errors on surface finish. By minimizing the forces we can increase tool life. Different optimization method can be used considering process parameters like feed rate, spindle speed, steps, tool diameter, magnitude and preset maximum force. The optimization can be done for minimum machining time, minimum tool travel, minimum production cost or for good surface finish. Efficiency of surface machined is also considered by maximum scallop height and by gouging. Gouging are the main reason for discrepancies of surface accuracy and texture specification. It also causes damage to part,s surface and machine tool. Scallop height tolerance help us in measuring the quality of free-form surface. Selection of proper topology result in minimum path length. In CAM software choosing NURBS to create surface is considered to be good method for presenting surface as it is accepted by both IGES and STEP files of CAM software.[5]

gollark: I can just update every week with no major problems. Well, as long as I occasionally look at the "manual intervention required" newsfeed.
gollark: I'm on a second-hand laptop from, what, 2017? I value having my computer not randomly waste CPU cycles.
gollark: Also doesn't install Candy Crush randomly.
gollark: It's not just that - Linux has scripting, generally has less overhead, supports some development tooling better, and may actually be capable of running on more devices.
gollark: It manages something like 17 seconds boot time from kernel init to *usable desktop* (I think it might include connecting to Wifi, not sure); I do not control the firmware step and can't do much to the bootloader.

See also

References
  1. Lazoglu, I (2009). "Tool path optimization for free form surface machining". CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology. 58 (2009): 101–104. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.054.
  2. Ding, S (February 2003). "Adaptive iso-planar tool path generation for machining of free-form surfaces". Computer-Aided Design. 35 (2): 141–153. doi:10.1016/s0010-4485(02)00048-9.
  3. Kumar, Rajneesh (2006). "Optimization of CNC iso-scallop free form surface machining using a genetic algorithm". International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 46 (7–8): 811–819. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.07.028.
  4. Lasemi, Ali (2010). "Recent development in CNC machining of freeform surfaces: A state-of-the-art review". Computer-Aided Design. 42 (7): 641–654. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2010.04.002.
  5. Poniatowska, Malgorzata (2015). "Free-form surface machining error compensation applying 3D CAD machining pattern model". Computer-Aided Design. 62: 227–235. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2014.12.003.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.