Fishermen's Union Trading Co.

The Fishermen's Union Trading Company (F.U.T.C.), a limited liability company, was founded in 1911 to be the commercial arm of the Fishermen's Protective Union (FPU).[1] Its mandate, as set out by William Coaker, founder of the FPU, was to be the agent for cooperative purchasing of supplies by fishermen along the coast of Newfoundland and to also serve as a cooperative marketing agent of their fish catches.

Purpose

As part of the greater movement by Coaker to organize the fishermen along the coast by the formation of the FPU, it was necessary to establish a trading company to combat the credit or truck system existing at that time. Fishermen were encouraged to purchase shares which were then used to buy goods and sold back to the fishermen at cost.[1] In eight years with 4,421 shareholders and over 40 stores, the annual trade of fish and supplies was in excess of $3 million.

Expansion

In 1913 the company purchased the Crosbie premises at St. John's and the steamship Kintail. The steamship was renamed the Can’t Lose.[1] Upon the building of a new settlement called Port Union complete with wharves and housing facilities the headquarters were moved there in 1918.

By 1928, with a fleet of thirty schooners and three steamers it was recognized as one of the largest mercantile companies in Newfoundland and by 1937 it was identified as the largest.

Decline and closure

Although the company was the third largest exporter of salt cod from Newfoundland, it had limited capital to respond to changes in the industry. With the decline of the salt cod industry in Newfoundland in the 60s and early 70s the company suffered decline. In May 1977 it went into receivership on default of a $440,000 bank loan.[1]

gollark: Presumably, somewhat creepy overtargeted advertising, spread it further (which I don't really like in itself), probably (if I was weird and still used Google stuff on my phone) listen into my conversations.
gollark: Thing is, what I'm attempting to say is: what sort of bad things do you think people or companies could do with leaked or bought or whatever data?
gollark: Google does, if not much else, have, as far as I know, a good track record for not letting other people get their precious datas.
gollark: I was asking Solar, but yes, that's actually sensible I guess.
gollark: Anyway, what I'm saying is, outside of selling of data to other companies (which basically just spreads it more widely, which I guess you might be against in itself?), what particular bad things are you worried non-Google companies might do with your data?

References
  1. Encyclopedia of Newfoundland and Labrador, Volume two, page 187
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.