Fischer's inequality

In mathematics, Fischer's inequality gives an upper bound for the determinant of a positive-semidefinite matrix whose entries are complex numbers in terms of the determinants of its principal diagonal blocks. Suppose A, C are respectively p×p, q×q positive-semidefinite complex matrices and B is a p×q complex matrix. Let

so that M is a (p+q)×(p+q) matrix.

Then Fischer's inequality states that

If M is positive-definite, equality is achieved in Fischer's inequality if and only if all the entries of B are 0. Inductively one may conclude that a similar inequality holds for a block decomposition of M with multiple principal diagonal blocks. Considering 1×1 blocks, a corollary is Hadamard's inequality.

Proof

Assume that A and C are positive-definite. We have and are positive-definite. Let

We note that

Applying the AM-GM inequality to the eigenvalues of , we see

By multiplicativity of determinant, we have

In this case, equality holds if and only if M = D that is, all entries of B are 0.

For , as and are positive-definite, we have

Taking the limit as proves the inequality. From the inequality we note that if M is invertible, then both A and C are invertible and we get the desired equality condition.

Improvements

If M can be partitioned in square blocks Mij, then the following inequality by Thompson is valid:[1]

where [det(Mij)] is the matrix whose (i,j) entry is det(Mij).

In particular, if the block matrices B and C are also square matrices, then the following inequality by Everett is valid:[2]

Thompson's inequality can also be generalized by an inequality in terms of the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of the block matrices. Expressing the characteristic polynomial of the matrix A as

and supposing that the blocks Mij are m x m matrices, the following inequality by Lin and Zhang is valid:[3]

Note that if r = m, then this inequality is identical to Thompson's inequality.

gollark: The best, say, space mining tech, is not good, because there's basically none.
gollark: My open spying for Rustia hides [REDACTED] [DATA EXPUNGED] [DATA EATEN BY BEES].
gollark: Oh, you are, never mind.
gollark: <@!330678593904443393> become spy.
gollark: Sure, but they're one of the best available for *general* intelligence.

See also

Notes

  1. Thompson, R. C. (1961). "A determinantal inequality for positive definite matrices". Canadian Mathematical Bulletin. 4: 57–62. doi:10.4153/cmb-1961-010-9.
  2. Everitt, W. N. (1958). "A note on positive definite matrices". Glasgow Mathematical Journal. 3 (4): 173–175. doi:10.1017/S2040618500033670. ISSN 2051-2104.
  3. Lin, Minghua; Zhang, Pingping (2017). "Unifying a result of Thompson and a result of Fiedler and Markham on block positive definite matrices". Linear Algebra and Its Applications. 533: 380–385. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2017.07.032.

References

  • Fischer, Ernst (1907), "Über den Hadamardschen Determinentsatz", Arch. Math. U. Phys. (3), 13: 32–40.
  • Horn, Roger A.; Johnson, Charles R. (2012), Matrix Analysis, doi:10.1017/cbo9781139020411, ISBN 9781139020411.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.