Figure of thought

A figure of thought (Latin: figura sententiae, Greek: schema dianoias) is a rhetorical device sometimes distinguished from figure of speech.[1] In another sense the term has been used in the study of diagrams and drawings.[2]

Application to Latin literature

It may be difficult to draw the distinction between figures of speech and figures of thought, especially when the primary area of inquiry is poetry rather than a prose composition, which adheres to the rules of rhetorical theory that were for the most part created in their fullest articulation in the age of Quintilian (c. 35 – c. 100). In their approach to language, the Roman poets (Horace, Catullus, Propertius, Tibullus) did not distinguish between inventio and elocutio, which explains somewhat our confusion between figures of thought and figures of speech. The latter are exemplified most immediately by conceptual substitutions, such as metaphor or synecdoche, but if we consider not just the mere linguistic aspect of the substitution and focus most closely on the concepts themselves, then we may perceive the comprehensiveness of the conceptual for the poet, who operates with words to extend and amplify the potential semantics of poetic output.

Uses of the term

Ananda Coomaraswamy used the term in relation to the philosophy of Plato:

"Plato’s dialectic makes continual use of figures of speech, which are really figures of thought."[3]

The scholar of Latin literature Gordon Williams (died 2010)[4] published a study titled Figures of Thought in Roman Poetry (1980), stating in the introduction:

"Language was subject to ordering by exhaustive description of vocabulary, syntax, and figures. The content was likewise subject to ordering by the rules of inventio (the technique by which all the latent or inherent possibilities in a given idea or cluster of ideas could be 'discovered' and exploited)."[5]

A collection of drawings by Nikolaus Gansterer (2011) was titled "Drawing a Hypothesis: Figures of Thought".[6]

gollark: I assume people just assumed this sort of thing was too ridiculous to defend against.
gollark: Huh, wow, the article writers are impressively quick.
gollark: I wonder how well-cited that Wikipedia article is.
gollark: They aren't very good weapons for anything but warcrime maximization.
gollark: The police need *orbital bombardment*, obviously.

References
  1. Gideon O. Burton, "Figures of speech/figures of thought", Silva Rhetoricae, Brigham Young University
  2. Gerhard Dirmoser, "Figures of Thought: The Use of Diagrams in Science and Art", in "Drawing a Hypothesis", pp. 153-160
  3. "A Figure of Speech, or a Figure of Thought?", Studies in Comparative Religion, Vol. 6, No. 1, Winter 1972
  4. "Gordon Williams: Scholar who introduced many to the pleasures of Latin poetry" (obituary), The Times (London), 29 September 2010
  5. Williams, Gordon (1980). Figures of Thought in Roman Poetry. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-02456-2.
  6. "Drawing a Hypothesis: Figures of thought", a-n The Artists Information Company, 19 April 2012
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.