Field trace

In mathematics, the field trace is a particular function defined with respect to a finite field extension L/K, which is a K-linear map from L onto K.

Definition

Let K be a field and L a finite extension (and hence an algebraic extension) of K. L can be viewed as a vector space over K. Multiplication by α, an element of L,

,

is a K-linear transformation of this vector space into itself. The trace, TrL/K(α), is defined as the (linear algebra) trace of this linear transformation.[1]

For α in L, let σ1(α), ..., σn(α) be the roots (counted with multiplicity) of the minimal polynomial of α over K (in some extension field of K), then

.

If L/K is separable then each root appears only once[2] (however this does not mean the coefficient above is one; for example if α is the identity element 1 of K then the trace is [L:K] times 1).

More particularly, if L/K is a Galois extension and α is in L, then the trace of α is the sum of all the Galois conjugates of α,[1] i.e.,

where Gal(L/K) denotes the Galois group of L/K.

Example

Let be a quadratic extension of . Then a basis of If then the matrix of is:

,

and so, .[1] The minimal polynomial of α is X2 − 2a X + a2d b2.

Properties of the trace

Several properties of the trace function hold for any finite extension.[3]

The trace TrL/K : LK is a K-linear map (a K-linear functional), that is

.

If αK then

Additionally, trace behaves well in towers of fields: if M is a finite extension of L, then the trace from M to K is just the composition of the trace from M to L with the trace from L to K, i.e.

.

Finite fields

Let L = GF(qn) be a finite extension of a finite field K = GF(q). Since L/K is a Galois extension, if α is in L, then the trace of α is the sum of all the Galois conjugates of α, i.e.[4]

.

In this setting we have the additional properties,[5]

Theorem.[6] For bL, let Fb be the map Then FbFc if bc. Moreover, the K-linear transformations from L to K are exactly the maps of the form Fb as b varies over the field L.

When K is the prime subfield of L, the trace is called the absolute trace and otherwise it is a relative trace.[4]

Application

A quadratic equation, ax2 + bx + c = 0, with a ≠ 0, and coefficients in the finite field has either 0, 1 or 2 roots in GF(q) (and two roots, counted with multiplicity, in the quadratic extension GF(q2)). If the characteristic of GF(q) is odd, the discriminant, Δ = b2 − 4ac indicates the number of roots in GF(q) and the classical quadratic formula gives the roots. However, when GF(q) has even characteristic (i.e., q = 2h for some positive integer h), these formulas are no longer applicable.

Consider the quadratic equation ax2 + bx + c = 0 with coefficients in the finite field GF(2h).[7] If b = 0 then this equation has the unique solution in GF(q). If b ≠ 0 then the substitution y = ax/b converts the quadratic equation to the form:

.

This equation has two solutions in GF(q) if and only if the absolute trace In this case, if y = s is one of the solutions, then y = s + 1 is the other. Let k be any element of GF(q) with Then a solution to the equation is given by:

.

When h = 2m + 1, a solution is given by the simpler expression:

.

Trace form

When L/K is separable, the trace provides a duality theory via the trace form: the map from L × L to K sending (x, y) to TrL/K(xy) is a nondegenerate, symmetric, bilinear form called the trace form. An example of where this is used is in algebraic number theory in the theory of the different ideal.

The trace form for a finite degree field extension L/K has non-negative signature for any field ordering of K.[8] The converse, that every Witt equivalence class with non-negative signature contains a trace form, is true for algebraic number fields K.[8]

If L/K is an inseparable extension, then the trace form is identically 0.[9]

gollark: Why did you accept this "challenge"?
gollark: HA!
gollark: ++delete tomorrow
gollark: ++remind 4mo Take a break from installing Arch
gollark: ++remind 6mo Stop installing Arch

See also

Notes

  1. Rotman 2002, p. 940
  2. Rotman 2002, p. 941
  3. Roman 1995, p. 151 (1st ed.)
  4. Lidl & Niederreiter 1997, p.54
  5. Mullen & Panario 2013, p. 21
  6. Lidl & Niederreiter 1997, p.56
  7. Hirschfeld 1979, pp. 3-4
  8. Lorenz (2008) p.38
  9. Isaacs 1994, p. 369 as footnoted in Rotman 2002, p. 943

References

  • Hirschfeld, J.W.P. (1979), Projective Geometries over Finite Fields, Oxford Mathematical Monographs, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-853526-0
  • Isaacs, I.M. (1994), Algebra, A Graduate Course, Brooks/Cole Publishing
  • Lidl, Rudolf; Niederreiter, Harald (1997) [1983], Finite Fields, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 20 (Second ed.), Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-39231-4, Zbl 0866.11069
  • Lorenz, Falko (2008). Algebra. Volume II: Fields with Structure, Algebras and Advanced Topics. Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-72487-4. Zbl 1130.12001.
  • Mullen, Gary L.; Panario, Daniel (2013), Handbook of Finite Fields, CRC Press, ISBN 978-1-4398-7378-6
  • Roman, Steven (2006), Field theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 158 (Second ed.), Springer, Chapter 8, ISBN 978-0-387-27677-9, Zbl 1172.12001
  • Rotman, Joseph J. (2002), Advanced Modern Algebra, Prentice Hall, ISBN 978-0-13-087868-7

Further reading

  • Conner, P.E.; Perlis, R. (1984). A Survey of Trace Forms of Algebraic Number Fields. Series in Pure Mathematics. 2. World Scientific. ISBN 9971-966-05-0. Zbl 0551.10017.
  • Section VI.5 of Lang, Serge (2002), Algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 211 (Revised third ed.), New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-95385-4, MR 1878556, Zbl 0984.00001
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.