Bosonization

In theoretical condensed matter physics and particle physics, bosonization is a mathematical procedure by which a system of interacting fermions in (1+1) dimensions can be transformed to a system of massless, non-interacting bosons. [1] The method of bosonization was conceived independently by particle physicists Sidney Coleman and Stanley Mandelstam; and condensed matter physicists Daniel C. Mattis and Alan Luther in 1975.[1]

In particle physics, however, the boson is interacting, cf, the Sine-Gordon model, and notably through topological interactions,[2] cf. Wess–Zumino–Witten model.

The basic physical idea behind bosonization is that particle-hole excitations are bosonic in character. However, it was shown by Tomonaga in 1950 that this principle is only valid in one-dimensional systems.[3] Bosonization is an effective field theory that focuses on low-energy excitations.[4]

Mathematical descriptions

Two complex fermions are written as functions of a boson

[5]

while the inverse map is given by

All equations are normal-ordered. The changed statistics arises from anomalous dimensions of the fields.

Examples

In particle physics

The standard example in particle physics, for a Dirac field in (1+1) dimensions, is the equivalence between the massive Thirring model (MTM) and the quantum Sine-Gordon model. Sidney Coleman showed the Thirring model is S-dual to the sine-Gordon model. The fundamental fermions of the Thirring model correspond to the solitons (bosons) of the sine-Gordon model.[6]

In condensed matter

The Luttinger liquid model, proposed by Tomonaga and reformulated by J.M. Luttinger, describes electrons in one-dimensional electrical conductors under second-order interactions. Daniel C. Mattis and Elliot H. Lieb, proved in 1965,[7] that electrons could be modeled as bosonic interactions. The response of the electron density to an external perturbation can be treated as plasmonic waves. This model predicts the emergence of spin–charge separation.

gollark: Try NodeOS!
gollark: Or Great Information Transfer.
gollark: Git stands for GIT Is Tremendous.
gollark: The stages of git clone are: Receive a "pack" file of all the objects in the repo database Create an index file for the received pack Check out the head revision (for a non-bare repo, obviously)"Resolving deltas" is the message shown for the second stage, indexing the pack file ("git index-pack").Pack files do not have the actual object IDs in them, only the object content. So to determine what the object IDs are, git has to do a decompress+SHA1 of each object in the pack to produce the object ID, which is then written into the index file.An object in a pack file may be stored as a delta i.e. a sequence of changes to make to some other object. In this case, git needs to retrieve the base object, apply the commands and SHA1 the result. The base object itself might have to be derived by applying a sequence of delta commands. (Even though in the case of a clone, the base object will have been encountered already, there is a limit to how many manufactured objects are cached in memory).In summary, the "resolving deltas" stage involves decompressing and checksumming the entire repo database, which not surprisingly takes quite a long time. Presumably decompressing and calculating SHA1s actually takes more time than applying the delta commands.In the case of a subsequent fetch, the received pack file may contain references (as delta object bases) to other objects that the receiving git is expected to already have. In this case, the receiving git actually rewrites the received pack file to include any such referenced objects, so that any stored pack file is self-sufficient. This might be where the message "resolving deltas" originated.
gollark: UPDATE: this is wrong.

See also

References

  1. Gogolin, Alexander O. (2004). Bosonization and Strongly Correlated Systems. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-61719-2.
  2. Coleman, S. (1975). "Quantum sine-Gordon equation as the massive Thirring model" Physical Review D11 2088; Witten, E. (1984). "Non-abelian bosonization in two dimensions", Communications in Mathematical Physics 92 455-472. online
  3. Sénéchal, David (1999). An Introduction to Bosonization. Theoretical Methods for Strongly Correlated Electrons. CRM Series in Mathematical Physics. Springer. pp. 139–186. arXiv:cond-mat/9908262. Bibcode:2004tmsc.book..139S. doi:10.1007/0-387-21717-7_4. ISBN 978-0-387-00895-0.
  4. Sohn, Lydia (ed.) (1997). Mesoscopic electron transport. Springer. pp. cond–mat/9610037. arXiv:cond-mat/9610037. Bibcode:1996cond.mat.10037F. ISBN 978-0-7923-4737-8.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  5. In actuality, there is a cocycle prefactor to give correct (anti-)commutation relations with other fields under consideration.
  6. Coleman, S. (1975). "Quantum sine-Gordon equation as the massive Thirring model". Physical Review D. 11 (8): 2088. Bibcode:1975PhRvD..11.2088C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.2088.
  7. Mattis, Daniel C.; Lieb, Elliot H. (February 1965). Exact solution of a many-fermion system and its associated boson field. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 6. pp. 98–106. Bibcode:1994boso.book...98M. doi:10.1142/9789812812650_0008. ISBN 978-981-02-1847-8.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.