Family integrated church

In Protestant Christianity, a family integrated church is one in which parents and children ordinarily attend church services together, children stay all through church services without attending Sunday school or children's ministries, and organized groups and activities for children and youth are normally non-existent. Other terms used are family discipleship churches, family-centered ministry and inclusive-congregational ministry.[1]

A spectrum of such churches exists, where some completely eliminate all age-segregation and others allow for some in certain contexts. Although segregation may take place during weekday events, family-integrated churches are generally united in having children in the main worship service.[2] Timothy Paul Jones notes that in the family-integrated ministry model, "all age-graded classes and events are eliminated."[3] Family integrated churches emphasise inter-generational ministry and the "parents' responsibility to evangelize and disciple their own children."[1] Some advocates base this on the idea that families are the "God-ordained building blocks of the church."[4]

Adherents

Family-integrated churches can be found within many denominations. Other denominations or associations, such as the Primitive Baptists[5] and the Covenant Presbyterian Church[6] require family-integration of their churches. There are also parachurch organizations that work to promote family-integration and unite family-integrated churches, most notably Vision Forum and The National Center for Family Integrated Churches (NCFIC). These two organizations hosted a "Summit on Uniting Church and Home" in San Antonio, Texas, during September, 2001. The Summit discussed various issues, especially the "glaring dichotomy [that] still exists in those churches which practice unbiblical family-segregating, and teen-culture driven philosophies of church life."[7]

NCFIC is a parachurch organization, founded with the mission of promoting the sufficiency of scripture for church and family life and restoring family-integrated worship.[8] The center works toward this goal by hosting conferences and connecting family-integrated churches around the world with their church directory which lists around 800 affiliated churches.[9] Although they have a confession of faith that listed churches are required to agree with, affiliation with the NCFIC does not necessitate full agreement with the organization, only "substantial agreement."[10] Furthermore, aside from their unity on family-integration, churches may vary widely in beliefs and adherents may vary greatly on issues regarding the practice of their faith.

Positions for and against family integration

In 2009, B&H Academic published Perspectives on Family Ministry: Three Views (ISBN 0805448454) which included a contribution by Paul Renfro in favour of "Family-Integrated Ministry." Renfro argues that in the Old Testament, children were part of the "gathered assembly of God's people" (Deuteronomy 31:12), while "in first-century churches the presence of children in the church assembly was assumed," since Paul directly addressed children in Ephesians 6:1-3.[11] Scott Brown, a pastor and the director of the National Center of Family Integrated Churches,[12] argues for family integrated churches on the basis of the sufficiency of Scripture,[13] while advocates of the concept also argue that this is the practice of historic Christianity.[14] Ben Winslett, a Primitive Baptist and part of a church that requires family-integration, believes that family integrated worship builds family and better protects children from predators in the church, stating "So, what's my point? My point is that Christ's way is superior. It naturally removes the risk of incidents such as this. It builds stronger families and maintains a safer environment."[15]

Andreas Köstenberger has stated that the movement elevates "the family to an unduly high status that is unwarranted in light of the biblical teaching on the subject".[16] In his book God, Marriage, and Family: Rebuilding the Biblical Foundation, he concludes that churches should devise ways to disciple members, including young people, by instructing them in peer group settings, stating "using a peer group structure does not necessarily mean that the natural family structure is subverted but may helpfully complement and supplement it."[17] R. C. Sproul Jr., himself an elder at a family-integrated church, commented in a July 2011 blog post that the family integrated church movement has "distorted priorities" and that some "would rather be in a family-integrated Mormon ‘church’ than a divided evangelical church."[18] Presbyterian pastor Shawn Mathis argued that the movement's rejection of age-segregation was biblically unfounded and contrary to historical facts.[19] Further, John B. Carpenter, noted eight objections to the FICM: (1)The sufficiency of scripture: that scripture doesn't explicitly teach it; (2) Divisiveness: noted by Mathis above; (3) Contradicts Scripture: that Titus 2 recommends just the sorts of age segregation the FIC condemns; (4) Undermines the Authority of the Offices in the church: that pastors are called to teach in churches, not fathers; (5) The FIC Misreads Church History: that there have been age-segregated movements from the early days of church history; (6) The FIC is a Cure for a Disease that's Not Prevalent: that what it objects to isn't a widespread problem; (7) Misdefinition of the Church: that the church consists of individual believers, not family units; (8) Familism: that it appears to make the family the ultimate loyalty.[20]

gollark: (s)
gollark: I DID mention the cognitohazard.
gollark: The bank stores GTech™ data orbs containing numbers.
gollark: No.
gollark: Also, it is not "cash", it is in a bank account.

References

  1. Jones, Perspectives on Family Ministry, 52.
  2. Brown, Scott (2010). A Weed in the Church. Merchant Adventures LLC. pp. 61, 231. ISBN 0982056745.
  3. Jones, Timothy Paul (2009). Perspectives on Family Ministry: Three Views. B&H Academic. p. 42. ISBN 0-8054-4845-4.
  4. "A Biblical Confession for Uniting Church and Family". Vision Forum. Archived from the original on 5 November 2006. Retrieved 26 February 2011.
  5. Bradley, Jr, Lasserre. "What Do Primitive Baptists Believe?". March to Zion. Retrieved 2013-02-24.
  6. "Distinctives". Covenant Presbyterian Church Denominational Website. Retrieved 2013-02-24.
  7. Phillips, Doug. "Church Leaders Discuss Family-Integrated Churches". Vision Forum Ministries. Archived from the original on 6 January 2007. Retrieved 17 November 2013.
  8. "The Mission Of The National Center For Family Integrated Churches". The National Center for Family Integrated Churches. Retrieved 2015-01-15.
  9. "Church network". National Center for Family-Integrated Churches. Retrieved 25 February 2011.
  10. "Church listing sign up". National Center for Family-Integrated Churches. Retrieved 12 October 2012.
  11. Renfro, Paul (2009). "Family-Integrated Ministry". Perspectives on Family Ministry: Three Views. B&H Academic. pp. 68–69.
  12. Brown, Scott. "About". Scott Brown Online.
  13. Barrick, Audrey (9 February 2011). "Recovering the Sufficiency of Scripture in the Family, Church". The Christian Post. Retrieved 26 February 2011.
  14. Brown, Scott T. "My Top Four Favorite Family-Integrated Church Pastors". Vision Forum. Archived from the original on 5 December 2006. Retrieved 25 February 2011.
  15. Winslett, Ben. "Family Integrated Worship - God Ordained and Safe". March to Zion. Retrieved 2013-02-24.
  16. Köstenberger, Andreas J. God, Marriage, and Family: Rebuilding the Biblical Foundation (Crossway Books, 2004), p. 259.
  17. Kostenberger, God, Marriage, and Family, p. 258.
  18. R. C. Sproul, Jr., Ask RC: We can’t find a family integrated church, what should we do?, 22 July 2011.
  19. Mathis, Shawn C. "What Is a Family Integrated Church?: Rejecting activities which separate children from parents". The Aquila Report. Retrieved 2013-02-24.
  20. John B. Carpenter, "If the Family Is Central, Christ Isn't", The Christian Post, March 26, 2013.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.