Family Law Act 1996

Family Law Act 1996 (c 27) is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom governing divorce law and marriage. The law intends to modernise divorce and to shift slightly towards "no fault" divorce from the fault-based approach of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. The main part of the Act, dealing with divorce, was not proceeded with after pilot schemes found that it did not work well.[1]

Contents

Part I of the Act sets out the philosophical approach to divorce.

Part II set out a procedure for divorce which required spouses seeking divorce to attend a preliminary Information Session and to seek mediation as a first step. Part II and related sections of other parts were repealed and partially replaced by section 18 of the Children and Families Act 2014 after they were abandoned in practice in 1999.[1]

Part III of the act concerns provision of legal aid for mediation in family law and divorce.

Part IV set out the mechanisms and principles related to family homes (in particular Family Law Act home rights Notices affecting land), occupation orders, non-molestation orders and domestic violence orders and principles. Sections 30 and 31 concern the award of a statutory licence to occupy a home. Part IVA contains provisions related to forced marriage.

Part V contains supplemental sections.

Reception

The divorce sections of the Act received a great deal of media discussion and criticism,[2] with some seeing the new approach to divorce as encouraging "quickie" divorces (although in practice, a fault-based divorce under the old scheme could be completed much quicker than under this Act). The political commentator Anne McElvoy welcomed the abandonment of the Act's divorce sections seeing the extensive waiting periods and required mediation as an intrusive compromise between a proper "no fault" divorce system and the needs of "family fundamentalists".[3]

Following the decision by the UK Supreme Court in Owens v Owens, in February 2019 Justice Secretary David Gauke said that he would introduce legislation enacting no-fault divorce in the next session of Parliament.[4]

gollark: Also, I'm *pretty* sure you can't just try and stick a bigger/higher antenna onto a phone and have it *work*, anyway.
gollark: You can't just make an antenna bigger and expect it to work better, since that affects the frequencies of radio waves/microwaves it works best with.
gollark: Increasing the power to a radio makes it easier to receive, which can create all kinds of problems, so there are *regulations* about this.
gollark: Clearly not.
gollark: <@!202992030685724675> So it's been a while; how's your plan to increase CC popularity gone?

See also

References
  1. "To love, honour - and divorce?". The Independent. 2001-08-19. Retrieved 2017-09-11.
  2. "Marriage for the Millennium: Not in front of the lawyers ..." The Independent. 1998-02-12. Retrieved 2017-09-11.
  3. "Labour is right to abandon its plans to meddle in family life". The Independent. 1999-06-21. Retrieved 2017-09-11.
  4. Owen Bowcott (8 February 2019). "No-fault divorce to become law". The Guardian. Retrieved 8 February 2019.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.