Exsudoporus permagnificus

Exsudoporus permagnificus is a species of bolete fungus in the family Boletaceae, native to Europe. Described as new to science in 1981, the fungus was originally placed in genus Boletus.[1] Following molecular studies outlining a new phylogenetic framework for Boletaceae,[2][3] the fungus was transferred to the newly erected genus Exsudoporus in 2014, to which it is the type species.[4] Nevertheless, Wu and colleagues (2016) were reluctant to accept the newly proposed genus due to a lack of sufficient sequences and regarded it a synonym of Butyriboletus.[5] A 2019 study by Loizides and colleagues reinstated the status of Exsudoporus as a monophyletic genus sister to Butyriboletus, following additional collections and extended phylogenetic and morphological analyses.[6]

Exsudoporus permagnificus
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Fungi
Division:
Basidiomycota
Class:
Agaricomycetes
Order:
Boletales
Family:
Boletaceae
Genus:
Exsudoporus
Species:
E. permagnificus
Binomial name
Exsudoporus permagnificus
Pöder (1981)
Synonyms
  • Boletus permagnificus Pöder (1981)

Exsudoporus permagnificus is rare throughout Europe and listed as a vulnerable or endangered species in a number of regional and national checklists.[7][8][6] It forms ectomycorrhizal associations with oaks (Quercus), particularly Quercus suber, Quercus ilex, Quercus pubescens, Quercus alnifolia, Quercus pyrenaica and less often with sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa).[9][10]

References
  1. Pöder R. (1981). "Boletus permagnificus spec. nov. – ein auffallender Röhrling der Sektion Luridi Fr. assoziiert mit Eichen". Sydowia (in German). 34: 149–56.
  2. Nuhn ME, Binder M, Taylor AF, Halling RE, Hibbett DS (2013). "Phylogenetic overview of the Boletineae". Fungal Biology. 117 (7–8): 479–511. doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2013.04.008. PMID 23931115.
  3. Wu G, Feng B, Xu J, Zhu XT, Li YC, Zeng NK, Hosen MI, Yang ZL. "Molecular phylogenetic analyses redefine seven major clades and reveal 22 new generic clades in the fungal family Boletaceae". Fungal Diversity. 69 (1): 93–115. doi:10.1007/s13225-014-0283-8.
  4. Vizzini A. (August 22, 2014). "Nomenclatural novelties" (PDF). Index Fungorum (183): 1.
  5. Wu G, Li YC, Zhu XT, Zhao K, Han LH, Cui YY, Li F, Xu J, Yang ZL. (2016). One hundred noteworthy boletes from China. Fungal Diversity 81(1): 25–188.
  6. Loizides M, Bellanger JM, Assyov B, Moreau PA, Richard F (2019). "Present status and future of boletoid fungi (Boletaceae) on the island of Cyprus: cryptic and threatened diversity unraveled by 10-year study". Fungal Ecology. 41 (13): 65–81.
  7. Gyosheva MM, Denchev CM, Dimitrova EG, Assyov B, Petrova RD, Stoichev GT (2006). Red list of fungi in Bulgaria. Mycologia Balcanica 3(1): 81–87
  8. Karadelev M, Rusevska K. (2013). Contribution to Macedonian red list of fungi. In: Proceedings of the 4th Congress of Ecologists of Macedonia with International Participation, Ohrid, 12–15 October 2012, Skopje. Macedonian Ecological Society, pp. 68–73. Special issue 28.
  9. Muñoz JA. (2005). Fungi Europaei 2: Boletus s.l. Italy: Edizioni Candusso. ISBN 978-88-901057-6-0.
  10. Galli R. (2007). I Boleti. Atlante pratico-monographico per la determinazione dei boleti (in Italian) (3rd ed.). Milano, Italy: Dalla Natura.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.