Erkenntnis und wissenschaftliches Verhalten

Erkenntnis und wissenschaftliches Verhalten (English: Cognition and Scientific Behavior) is a 1936 book by the Norwegian philosopher Arne Næss. The work was influential and anticipated many themes familiar in subsequent analytic philosophy.

Erkenntnis und wissenschaftliches Verhalten
AuthorArne Næss
CountryNorway
LanguageGerman
SubjectsEpistemology
Philosophy of science
PublisherNorske Videnskaps-Akademi
Publication date
1936
Media typePrint
Pages249
OCLC5916296

Publication history

Erkenntnis und wissenschaftliches Verhalten was published in 1936 by Norske Videnskaps-Akademi (the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters).[1]

Reception

Erkenntnis und wissenschaftliches Verhalten received a positive review from the psychologist Egon Brunswik in Philosophy of Science. Brunswik wrote that psychology was gaining increased importance within philosophy and the sciences by becoming its "preferred center of organization", and that Næss's book was part of this trend. He believed that Næss presented a "new and modernistic" version of psychology that was more promising than the "psychologism" of the late 19th century, maintaining that Næss emphasized "objective psychology" over "subjectivistic" ideas. He credited Næss with an impressive "revolutionary keenness" in the way he questioned "the absolute character of the antagonism between the empirical and the logical, and, within the latter, between true and false." He concluded that Næss's book was an "interesting and promising first publication."[1]

The book was also reviewed in Theoria. A Swedish Journal of Philosophy and Psychology. Næss replied to the review.[2]

The philosopher Alastair Hannay states that Erkenntnis und wissenschaftliches Verhalten is a seminal work, in which Næss anticipates many themes familiar in post-war analytic philosophy.[3] The historian and philosopher of science Friedrich Stadler commented that it was regrettable that the work was not included in Næss's Selected Papers.[4]

gollark: > * So: if the arg is a PyLong, use its absolute value.> * Otherwise use its hash value, cast to unsigned.
gollark: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/fa2eee975dbf7d2728021ef9d97328bbe88351cf/Modules/_randommodule.c#L266
gollark: The `super().seed(a)` function it passes stuff onto may be doing things internally.
gollark: You can pass it things which aren't actually ints.
gollark: I think the python `random.seed` thing runs the seed you use through a bunch of weird processes including SHA512 and stuff, instead of just directly seeding the RNG with it.

References
  1. Brunswik 1938, pp. 105–107.
  2. Stadler 2010, p. 23.
  3. Hannay 2005, p. 663.
  4. Stadler 2010, p. 13.

Bibliography
Books
  • Hannay, Alastair (2005). "Norwegian philosophy". In Honderich, Ted (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-926479-1.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  • Stadler, Friedrich (2010). "Arne Naess – Dogmas and Problems of Empiricism". In Stadler, Friedrich; Manninen, Juha (eds.). The Vienna Circle in the Nordic Countries: Networks and Transformations of Logical Empiricism (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-9048136827.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Journals
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.