Equivariant algebraic K-theory

In mathematics, the equivariant algebraic K-theory is an algebraic K-theory associated to the category of equivariant coherent sheaves on an algebraic scheme X with action of a linear algebraic group G, via Quillen's Q-construction; thus, by definition,

For the topological equivariant K-theory, see topological K-theory.

In particular, is the Grothendieck group of . The theory was developed by R. W. Thomason in 1980s.[1] Specifically, he proved equivariant analogs of fundamental theorems such as the localization theorem.

Equivalently, may be defined as the of the category of coherent sheaves on the quotient stack .[2][3] (Hence, the equivariant K-theory is a specific case of the K-theory of a stack.)

A version of the Lefschetz fixed point theorem holds in the setting of equivariant (algebraic) K-theory.[4]

Fundamental theorems

Let X be an equivariant algebraic scheme.

Localization theorem  Given a closed immersion of equivariant algebraic schemes and an open immersion , there is a long exact sequence of groups

Examples

One of the fundamental examples of equivariant K-theory groups are the equivariant K-groups of -equivariant coherent sheaves on a points, so . Since is equivalent to the category of finite-dimensional representations of . Then, the Grothendieck group of , denoted is .[5]

Torus ring

Given an algebraic torus a finite-dimensional representation is given by a direct sum of -dimensional -modules called the weights of .[6] There is an explicit isomorphism between and given by sending to its associated character.[7]

gollark: Basically, it's the idea that, since there's a chance of god existing, and if they do you'll get infinite happiness if you do believe or infinite suffering if you don't, but if they don't exist you'll not lose much by believing anyway.
gollark: I can provide a brief summary I guess.
gollark: Religion informs people's actions. *It is relevant*.
gollark: Also, opportunity cost.
gollark: The main issue is that the Judeo-Christian god is but a single point in the infinite (or very big) space of *possible* gods.

References

  1. Charles A. Weibel, Robert W. Thomason (1952–1995).
  2. Adem, Alejandro; Ruan, Yongbin (June 2003). "Twisted Orbifold K-Theory". Communications in Mathematical Physics. 237 (3): 533–556. arXiv:math/0107168. Bibcode:2003CMaPh.237..533A. doi:10.1007/s00220-003-0849-x. ISSN 0010-3616.
  3. Krishna, Amalendu; Ravi, Charanya (2017-08-02). "Algebraic K-theory of quotient stacks". arXiv:1509.05147 [math.AG].
  4. BFQ 1979
  5. Chriss, Neil; Ginzburg, Neil. Representation theory and complex geometry. pp. 243–244.
  6. For there is a map sending . Since there is an induced representation of weight . See Algebraic torus for more info.
  7. Okounkov, Andrei (2017-01-03). "Lectures on K-theoretic computations in enumerative geometry". p. 13. arXiv:1512.07363 [math.AG].
  • N. Chris and V. Ginzburg, Representation Theory and Complex Geometry, Birkhäuser, 1997.
  • Baum, P., Fulton, W., Quart, G.: Lefschetz Riemann Roch for singular varieties. Acta. Math. 143, 193–211 (1979)
  • Thomason, R.W.:Algebraic K-theory of group scheme actions. In: Browder, W. (ed.) Algebraic topology and algebraic K-theory. (Ann. Math. Stud., vol. 113, pp. 539 563) Princeton: Princeton University Press 1987
  • Thomason, R.W.: Lefschetz–Riemann–Roch theorem and coherent trace formula. Invent. Math. 85, 515–543 (1986)
  • Thomason, R.W., Trobaugh, T.: Higher algebraic K-theory of schemes and of derived categories. In: Cartier, P., Illusie, L., Katz, N.M., Laumon, G., Manin, Y., Ribet, K.A. (eds.) The Grothendieck Festschrift, vol. III. (Prog. Math. vol. 88, pp. 247 435) Boston Basel Berlin: Birkhfiuser 1990
  • Thomason, R.W., Une formule de Lefschetz en K-théorie équivariante algébrique, Duke Math. J. 68 (1992), 447–462.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.