Equal-to-apostles

An equal-to-the-apostles (Greek: ἰσαπόστολος, isapóstolos; Latin: aequalis apostolis; Arabic: معادل الرسل‎, muʿādil ar-rusul; Georgian: მოციქულთასწორი, motsikultasts'ori; Romanian: întocmai cu Apostolii; Russian: равноапостольный, ravnoapostol'nyj; Bulgarian and Serbian: равноапостолни, ravnoapostolni; Albanian: i barabartë me Apostolët; Ukrainian: рівноапостольний) is a special title given to some saints in Eastern Orthodoxy and in Byzantine Catholicism. The title is bestowed as a recognition of these saints' outstanding service in the spreading and assertion of Christianity, comparable to that of the original apostles.

Examples

Below is a partial list of saints who are called equal-to-the-apostles:

Other usages of the term

Political

As George Ostrogorsky relates, the insistence of pre-Christian Roman emperors on being worshipped as gods had always been a fundamental stumbling block for early Christians (see Anti-Christian policies in the Roman Empire). Nevertheless, even with the advent of Christian emperors, of which Constantine the Great was the first, the sovereign's power maintained a distinctly divine flavour. Indeed, to use Ostrogorsky's more strongly worded phrasing, "the Roman-Hellenistic cult of the sovereign lived on in the Christian Byzantine empire in all its ancient glory."[1] The Greek term for "Equal-to-the-Apostles", isapóstolos, was used in the late Roman/Byzantine empire to contribute to this divine imperial image. Constantine himself seems to have had this in mind when, according to Eusebius of Caesarea, he designed the Church of the Holy Apostles to be his tomb in Constantinople:

[This edifice] the emperor consecrated with the desire of perpetuating the memory of the apostles of our Saviour. He had, however, another object in erecting this building: an object at first unknown, but which afterwards became evident to all. He had in fact made choice of this spot in the prospect of his own death, anticipating with extraordinary fervor of faith that his body would share their title with the apostles themselves [τῆς τῶν ἀποστόλων προσρήσεως κοινωνὸν], and that he should thus even after death become the subject, with them, of the devotions which should be performed to their honor in this place. He accordingly caused twelve coffins to be set up in this church, like sacred pillars in honor and memory of the apostolic number, in the center of which his own was placed, having six of theirs on either side of it.

— Eusebius of Caesarea, Life of Constantine[2]

Symbolism aside, modern scholars offer differing accounts as to whether Eusebius ever used the actual title of isapóstolos in reference to Constantine. John Julius Norwich maintains that "for the last few years of his life, Constantine had regularly used the title isapóstolos",[3] though he does not cite a primary source. The New Catholic Encyclopedia (supplement 2010) states that Eusebius did refer to Constantine with this title, although it too does not cite a primary source.[4] Aidan Nichols also shares this view, positing that Eusebius did indeed describe Constantine as isapóstolos, but that a later editor, or "interpolator," had reduced his status to isepiskopos—Equal-to-a-Bishop—so as to make Constantine seem more modest.[5] In contrast to this, Jonathan Bardill states rather bluntly that our sources do not directly speak of Constantine as an equal of the apostles until the 5th century (that is, after Eusebius).[6]

This characterization was not without its problems, however. As alluded to above, though Constantine himself may very much have intended to be recognized as isapóstolos, many theologians and churchmen were made uneasy at this prospect. As Gilbert Dagron explains, the difficulty was not necessarily that Constantine was unworthy (merely immodest, more like), but rather that the title resulted in a very ambiguous mixing of church and state.[7] Thus when Sozomen deals with Constantine's funeral in his ecclesiastical history, he makes a point of saying that bishops were afterwards interred in the same place, "for the hierarchical dignity is not only equal in honor to imperial power, but, in sacred places, even takes the ascendancy."[8]

In time, however, the soon to be sainted Constantine would nevertheless become firmly established as isapóstolos, being enshrined as such in the Bibliotheca Hagiographica Graeca[9] and other Byzantine literature (ex. Anna Komnene confidently calls him the 13th apostle in the Alexiad, to whom she likens her father Alexius).[10] Indeed, in this capacity he proved to be an irresistible model for many later Byzantine rulers, who would regularly make use of the title isapóstolos themselves—for political—as well as religious reasons. [11]

gollark: ...
gollark: > people with aspergers have an easier time picking up on emotion... isn't the opposite true?
gollark: I mean, if you have access to the routermodembox's admin panel, you could just disconnect people you don't like from it!
gollark: There's generally the common issue of trying to teach people stuff they often do not actually care about in very boring ways.
gollark: I think most of it does, really, but often in different ways.

References
  1. Ostrogorsky, George. "The Byzantine Emperor and the Hierarchical World Order" in The Slavonic and East European Review, Vol. 35, No. 84. (Dec., 1956), 2
  2. Eusebius of Caesarea, Life of Constantine. Translated by Rev. Arthur Cushman McGiffert, Ph.D.,(New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1890), bk. IV, 60
  3. Norwich, John Julius. A Short History of Byzantium (New York: Vintage Books, 1999), 18
  4. Rev. Francis X and Perry J. Cahall. History of the (1) Early Church in "New Catholic Encyclopedia Supplement 2010 Volume 1" Ed. Robert L. Fastiggi. (Detroit: Gale, Cengage Learning ; Washington, D.C. : In association with Catholic University of America, 2010), 268
  5. Nichols, Aidan O.P. Rome and the Eastern Churches, a Study in Schism (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2010), 182f
  6. Bardill, Jonathan. Constantine, Divine Emperor of the Christian Golden Age (New York: Cambridge university Press, 2012), 373, 392
  7. Dagron, Gilbert. Emperor and Priest: the Imperial Office in Byzantium translated by Jean Birrell, (Cambridge: University Press, 2003), 141f
  8. Sozomen. Ecclesiastical History II, 34
  9. BHG 362
  10. Anna Komnene. Alexiad XIV, 8
  11. Treitinger, Otto. Die oströmische Kaiser- und Reichsidee nach ihrer Gestaltung im höfischen Zeremoniell (Darmstadt: H. Gentner., 1956), 129f
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.