Elizabeth Nodder

Elizabeth Nodder was a 19th Century publisher of the illustrated The Naturalist's Miscellany.[1] However, she is listed in the database of Scientific Illustrators as an artist.[2] She and her husband, Frederick Polydore Nodder collaborated in the publishing of this work, until his death circa 1800, when she continued to publish further volumes in the series, with Richard Polydore Nodder (their son)[3] as illustrator.[4]

Naturalist's miscellany by George Shaw, E. Nodder

George Kearsley Shaw, the naturalist, authored the texts of the miscellany from 1798-1813.[1] The title pages of Volumes 1-12 give George Shaw and F.P. Nodder as authors. In vol 13 E.R. Nodder is listed after George Shaw. In vol 14, George Shaw is followed by E. & R. Nodder, while in the remaining volumes (15-24) (vols 13, 14) E. Nodder is listed together with George Shaw (vols 15-24). The Biodiversity heritage library lists her as publisher in their metadata, [1] and this is the view of Dickinson,[3] and is borne out be the evidence of the plates.

Trochilus minimus, August 1, 1801, Published by Elizabeth Nodder, Sons & Co.

Her contribution to George Shaw and Frederick Nodder Vivarium naturae or The Naturalist's Miscellany, in addition to publication after her husband's death, was proposed by evidence of signatures on the wrappers of some volumes. A revision of her attribution to any artwork found little evidence to support the theory, and no signatures at the printing plates, and any involvement in preparation of the illustrations remains uncertain.[3]

Further reading
  • Somerville, J. D. (James Dugald) (1950), Notes on Volumes I to XXIV of Shaw and Nodder's Naturalists miscellany, 1789 to 1813, retrieved 14 March 2019
  • Peltz, L. (2004) "Nodder, Frederick Polydore". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/20228
gollark: There, transmuted.
gollark: ++recreate RocketRace as entirely made of calcium
gollark: ++delete <@156021301654454272>
gollark: I'd say it obviously depends on the picture. I mean, a blank white page is not very meaningful, but you can probably fit a few hundred words of *text* into an image, or describe a lot about a landscape or something.
gollark: The saying about pictures containing a thousand words is inaccurate.The average picture contains a large amount of information by many metrics, but a much *smaller* amount of it is actually meaningful and relevant to whatever you're doing with the picture.

References
  1. Shaw, G. (1789-1812 "The naturalist's miscellany, or Coloured figures of natural objects" ill. Frederick Polydore Nodder, pub. Elizabeth Nodder, London. (vols 1-24) doi:10.5962/bhl.title.79941 Retrieved 14 March 2019.
  2. "DSI - datatabase of scientific illustrators 1450-1950". dsi.hi.uni-stuttgart.de. Retrieved 2019-03-13.
  3. Dickinson, Edward C.; Bruce, Murray D.; Dowsett, Robert J. (1 October 2006). "Vivarium naturae or the naturalist's miscellany (1789–1813) by George Shaw: an assessment of the dating of the parts and volumes". Archives of Natural History. 33 (2): 322–343. doi:10.3366/anh.2006.33.2.322. ISSN 0260-9541. PDF
  4. Wikisource: Nodder, Frederick P. (DNB00) Retrieved 14 March 2018.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.