Edward F. Hills
Edward Freer Hills (1912–1981) was an American Presbyterian scholar, perhaps the greatest 20th Century Traditional ("Byzantine") Text and Received Text defender.[1][2]
Contribution
Dr. Hills integrates his theological perspective alongside New Testament criticism. Reading Dean John William Burgon inspired Dr. Hills to approach textual criticism from a "logic of faith" (1952 is the year that Dr. Hills made a definite commitment to this view).[3] As to the relationship of the King James Bible to the Received Text, Hills wrote "the King James Version ought to be regarded not merely as a translation of the Textus Receptus but also as an independent variety of the Textus Receptus."[4]
Education
- Graduated summa cum laude at Yale University (1930–33)[5]
- Th.D. from Westminster Theological Seminary (ca. 1935)
- Th.M. from Columbia Theological Seminary
- Th.D. in New Testament textual criticism from Harvard under the supervision of Henry J. Cadbury, Kirsopp Lake as one of the readers[6]
Books
- The King James Version Defended: A Christian View of the New Testament Manuscripts (PDF), Christian Research Press, 1956, ISBN 0-915923-00-9.
- Believing Bible Study (3rd ed.), 1991 [1967, 1977], ISBN 0-915923-01-7.
Références
- Beacham, Roy E; Bauder, Kevin T (2001), One Bible only?: examining exclusive claims for the King James Bible, p. 48,
Edward F. Hills – Another individual who made a sizable contribution to the King James-Only movement, although not drawing directly from the works of Wilkinson and Ray, is Edward F. Hills (1912–1981). Hills actually possessed genuine...
- Price, James D (2006), King James Onlyism: A New Sect, p. 263.
- Cloud, David, The Testimony of Dr. Edward F. Hills, Way of life, 2nd to last paragraph.
- "8", King James Version Defended, Jesus is Lord.
- Barnett, Robert, KJV Bible, Dean Burgon Society.
- Whitmer, John, Hills Revisited (PDF), Holy Word café.
gollark: Is someone asleep alive? What if they're in a coma?
gollark: Functioning how?
gollark: Would you say you're on fire right now?
gollark: By some definitions, fire is alive. Also stars.
gollark: No.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.