Ecological validity

In research, the ecological validity of a study is the extent to which the materials and setting of the study approximate to the real-world context that is being examined.[1] Unlike internal and external validity, ecological validity is not necessary to the overall validity of a study.[2]

For the ecological validity of a cue in perception, see ecological validity (perception).

The original meaning of 'ecological validity' defines it narrowly as a property of stimuli in perceptual experiments.[3]

Vs. Realism and external validity

The term "ecological validity" is now widely used by researchers unfamiliar with the origins and technical meaning of the term to be broadly equivalent to what Aronson and Carlsmith (1968) called "mundane realism." Mundane realism references the extent to which the experimental situation is similar to situations people are likely to encounter outside the laboratory. For example, mock-jury research is designed to study how people might act if they were jurors during a trial, but many mock-jury studies simply provide written transcripts or summaries of trials, and do so in classroom or office settings. Such experiments do not approximate the actual look, feel, and procedure of a real courtroom trial, and therefore lack mundane realism. The better-recognized concern is that of external validity: if the results from such a mock-jury study are reproduced in and generalize across trials where these stimulus materials, settings, and other background characteristics vary, then the measurement process may be deemed externally valid.

References

[4]

gollark: I think I'm "working on" a search thing vaguely similar to Recoll but ideally faster, personal wiki software, 4D tic-tac-toe (without multiversal time travel), and inevitably other stuff I forgot.
gollark: Of course, I have no specifications or willingness to pay anyone anything whatsoever to develop these, so basically you would just have to spend vast amounts of time guessing what I wanted.
gollark: I need something like 19712984 custom things made and I can't be bothered to do most of them. Here is an illustrative diagram.
gollark: I could offload my unfinished software projects for you.
gollark: I don't actually know anything about Laplace transforms beyond that you can use them to do certain differential equations easily, and they're vaguely like more generalized Fourier transforms.

See also

References
  1. Brewer, M. (2000). Research Design and Issues of Validity. In Reis, H. and Judd, C. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  2. Shadish, W., Cook, T., and Campbell, D. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference Boston:Houghton Mifflin.
  3. Hammond, Kenneth R. (September 1998). "Ecological Validity: Then and Now". University at Albany. Retrieved 31 January 2017.
  4. Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1968). Experimentation in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1-79). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.