East Queen's
East Queen's was a federal electoral district in Prince Edward Island, Canada, that was represented in the House of Commons of Canada from 1896 to 1904.
 | |
|---|---|
| Defunct federal electoral district | |
| Legislature | House of Commons |
| District created | 1892 |
| District abolished | 1903 |
| First contested | 1896 |
| Last contested | By-election 1901 |
This riding was created in 1892 from parts of King's County and Queen's County ridings.
It was abolished in 1903 when it was redistributed into King's and Queen's ridings.
It consisted of the eastern part of Queen's County and parts of King's County.
Election results
| 1896 Canadian federal election | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | ||||||
| Conservative | MARTIN, A. | 2,175 | ||||||
| Liberal | WELSH, William | 1,821 | ||||||
| 1900 Canadian federal election | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | ||||||
| Liberal | MCKINNON, D.A. | 2,257 | ||||||
| Conservative | MARTIN, Alexander | 2,250 | ||||||
By-election: On election being declared void, 11 February 1901
| By-election on 20 March 1901 | |||||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | MCKINNON, D.A. | 2,433 | |||
| Conservative | MARTIN, Alex. | 2,039 | |||
gollark: > I never tried it. It's nice that it has these safety features but I prefer C++ still. > If I want to be sure that my program is free of bugs, I can write a formal specification and do a > correctness proof with the hoare calculus in some theorem proofer (People did that for the seL4 microkernel, which is free from bugs under some assumptions and used in satellites, nuclear power plants and such)Didn't doing that for seL4 require several hundred thousand lines of proof code?
gollark: Most countries have insanely convoluted tax law so I assume it's possible.
gollark: Hmm, so you need to obtain a hypercomputer of some sort to write your tax forms such that they cannot plausibly be checked?
gollark: What if it's somehow really easy to find *a* solution to something, but not specific ones, and hard to check the validity of a specific maybe-solution? Is that possible?
gollark: Er, maybe?
See also
- List of Canadian federal electoral districts
- Past Canadian electoral districts
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.