E1 (Jerusalem)

The E1 zone (sometimes E-1 zone) or E1 area or E1 (short for East 1) (Hebrew: מְבַשֶּׂרֶת אֲדֻמִּים‎, Mevaseret Adumim) is an area of the West Bank within the municipal boundary of the Israeli settlement[1] of Ma'ale Adumim. It is located adjacent to and northeast of East Jerusalem and to the west of Ma'ale Adumim.[2][3] It covers an area of 12 square kilometres (4.6 sq mi), which is home to a number of Bedouin communities and their livestock as well as a large Israeli police headquarters.[1] The Palestinian tent site of Bab al Shams, which was established for several days in early 2013, also lay within this area.

There are Israeli plans for construction in E1, named the E1 Plan, frozen since at least 2009 under international pressure. This plan is not synonymous with the expansion of Ma'ale Adumim.[3] The plan was initially conceived by Yitzhak Rabin in 1995.[4]

Construction in E1 is controversial. Critics say that the plan aims at preventing any possible expansion of East Jerusalem by creating a physical link between Ma'ale Adumim and Jerusalem,[5] and that it would effectively complete a crescent of Israeli settlements around East Jerusalem dividing it from the rest of the West Bank and its Palestinian population centres, and create a continuous Jewish population between Jerusalem and Ma'ale Adumim. It would also nearly bisect the West Bank jeopardizing the prospects of a contiguous Palestinian state.[1][6][7] Palestinians describe the E1 plan as an effort to Judaize Jerusalem.[8][9][10]

The international community considers Israeli settlements in the West Bank illegal under international law, but the Israeli government disputes this.[11]

Geography

Situated in the West Bank,[2] the E1 area is bordered by the French Hill neighborhood of Jerusalem to the west, Abu Dis to the southwest, Kedar to the south, Ma'ale Adumim to the east, and Almon to the north. The area is mountainous and covers almost 3,000 acres. The E1 area runs between the Eastern most edges of annexed East Jerusalem and nearby Ma'ale Adumim, a large Israeli settlement located East of the pre-1967 green line.[1][12] E1 falls within Area C of the West Bank, under full Israeli military and civilian control, and is administered by Ma'ale Adumim.[13]

History
See also: Ma'ale Adumim and Israeli–Palestinian peace process

During the government of Yitzhak Shamir in 1991 part of the area currently known as E1 was transferred to the Ma'ale Adumim local council. In January 1994, the Higher Planning Council of Judea and Samaria's Subcommittee for Settlement tabled a new plan that expanded the municipal plan for Ma'ale Adumim and, in effect, constituted the basis for the future E1 Plan. Yitzhak Rabin expanded the borders of Ma'ale Adumim to include the area known as E1 and instructed Housing Minister Binyamin Ben Eliezer to begin planning a neighborhood at the location. Rabin, however, refrained from implementing any construction in the E1 area.[3] From then on, planning and authorization procedures for the E1 neighborhood were promoted but were never totally completed, given the diplomatic constraints.[14]

Following the legal terms of the Oslo II Interim Agreement from 28 September 1995. The area E1 was designated as Area C, where Israel retained the powers of zoning and planning. Despite long-standing plans for the municipality of Ma'aleh Adumim to build 3000 new housing units on the E1 territory, Israel undertook unilateral limitations upon itself in this area.[15][16]

Since Yitzhak Rabin every Israeli prime minister has supported the plan to create Israeli urban contiguity between Ma'ale Adumim and Jerusalem:

On 13 March 1996, Prime Minister Shimon Peres reaffirmed the government's position that Israel will demand applying Israeli sovereignty over Ma’aleh Adumim in the framework of a permanent peace agreement. Yossi Beilin, a dovish politician and co-author of the Geneva Initiative, supported annexing Ma’aleh Adumim.[14] According to a document of understandings between former minister Yossi Beilin and Mahmoud Abbas from the mid-1990s, while some Jerusalem Arab neighborhoods were to be transferred to a future Palestinian state, Israel was to annex the Jewish communities around Jerusalem, such as Ma'ale Adumim, Givat Zeev, Beitar, and Efrat. According to the Clinton outline for partitioning Jerusalem that arose in the talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority at the 2000 Camp David Summit, Israel was to be compensated for partitioning the city by annexing Ma'ale Adumim.[14]

During the Ehud Barak government, the Prime Minister expressed support for E1 but refrained from undertaking any construction in the E1 area. Barak did place the issue of E1 on the negotiating table at Taba and the matter remained unresolved when the Taba talks broke up.[3]

In 2002, Binyamin Ben-Eliezer the Minister of Defense signed the Master Plan for E1 (expedited, but not approved under Netanyahu administration) into law. Ben Eliezer subsequently pledged to the U.S. administration not to implement the E1 plan, and indeed no further statutory planning was carried out and there was no construction in E1 during his tenure in office.[3]

In mid-2004, construction commenced on infrastructure in E1. The work was carried out by the Ministry of Construction and was illegal: in the absence of a Specific Town Plan, no permits could be or were issued to allow for this work. The work included the clearing of roads for major highways leading to the planned residential areas and site preparation for the planned police station which would also incorporate the police station in Ras Al Amud which would be transferred there.[3]

During the 2007 Annapolis Conference, then-prime minister Ehud Olmert and then-foreign minister Tzipi Livni demanded that Ma’aleh Adumim remain a part of Israel. During the Netanyahu government, the Prime Minister attempted to expedite the E1 Master Plan. A first statutory step to implementation of the plan, which includes general land designations but is not specific enough to allow the issuance of building permits, was undertaken, along with the establishment of a Greater Jerusalem umbrella municipality which was to include Ma'ale Adumim.[3] Netanyahu's also declared that "the State of Israel will continue to build in Jerusalem and in all the places on the state’s strategic map" is a continuation of the political tradition that views control over E1 as a cardinal Israeli interest.[14]

Since 2008, the headquarters of the Judea and Samaria district of the Israeli Police Department are situated in the E1.

In December 2012, in response to the United Nations approving the Palestinian bid for "non-member observer state" status, Israel announced the next day that it was resuming planning and zoning work in E1 area.[17][18] EU ministers expressed their "dismay"[19] and five European countries summoned Israeli ambassadors to protest.[20]

E1 Plan

The plan for the E1 area within the municipal boundary of Ma'ale Adumim, sought to develop the area in order to link Ma'ale Adumim and its 40,000 residents to Jerusalem.[14] It entails building about 3,500-15,000 housing units, the now-completed police headquarters of the Judea and Samaria district, as well as a large industrial zone, tourism, and commercial areas. Also a garbage dump and a large cemetery to be shared by Jerusalem and Ma'ale Adumim.[21]

The proposed construction of a further new road around the settlement of Kedar in 2009 was also seen as attempting to facilitate residential development in E1.[22]

The disputed E1 area is located in the West Bank and spans the area between Jerusalem and the Israeli settlement of Ma'ale Adumim. The land in question comprises about 12,000 dunams, which is roughly 12 square kilometers (4.6 sq mi).[3][23]

If the E1 plan is fully implemented Palestinians could, theoretically, travel between the northern and southern West Bank via a road that at this time does not exist, looping around the Ma'ale Adumim bloc and the expanded area of Jerusalem. There have also been suggestions for an alternate road route for Palestinians running north-south between Ma'ale Adumim and Jerusalem that uses overpasses and tunnels to bypass Israeli settlements.[3]

Objectives

The Israeli government says that the E1 plan is critical to Israeli national security interests and poses no threat to the formation of a continuous Palestinian state in the West Bank.[24] Israeli military officials claim that E1 is necessary for Israel to possess defensible borders, primarily for the protection of the capital, Jerusalem.[25] Despite his conservative background, many Israelis accuse the current Prime Minister, Bejnamin Netanyahu, of holding back settlement plans in a bid to please the Obama administration.[26]

According to the Palestinian presidential chief of staff, Rafiq Husseini, "The E1 plan would separate the northern and southern West Bank from East Jerusalem, which would prevent the establishment of Palestinian state".[27] However, an area 12 miles wide between Ma'Ale Adumim and the Jordan River would still exist under Palestinian control, according to Olmert's 2008 offer and Israel's offer at the Camp David Summit. The E-1 plan does not geographically prohibit those offers from being implemented.

Though critics say that the plan is intended to cut off Palestinian neighborhoods of East Jerusalem from the rest of the West Bank, Palestinian neighborhoods like Abu Dis in East Jerusalem would still have access to the West Bank.[28] Once the E1 plan is implemented, Palestinians will be able to travel from Bethlehem to Ramallah by going around Ma'ale Adumim. The Israeli government offered in 2008 under then Israeli premiere Ehud Olmert to build a road as part of a comprehensive settlement connecting Bethlehem and Ramallah, but the Palestinians rejected it.[29]

Controversy

Palestinian Contiguity Road

Construction in the area is a subject of controversy. Palestinians say that it would prevent contiguity between the northern and southern areas of the West Bank making "the creation of a contiguous Palestinian state almost impossible" and increase travel time between Ramallah region north of Jerusalem to the Bethlehem region to the south. This would make it harder to reach agreement over permanent borders. The United States, EU and UN have supported the Palestinian position and has sought to block Israeli construction at the site, pending a final peace agreement. According to the UN and EU, construction in this area will deal a "fatal blow" to the two-state solution and make it "almost inconceivable".[30][31] Israeli governments have so far avoided construction in E1 due to international pressure.[32][33]

To address Palestinian concerns, Israel has constructed a series of bypass roads that allow access from East Jerusalem to the West Bank. The total cost of construction was estimated in 2009 as amounting to ₪200,000,000 (approx. US$50,000,000) for the previous two years. The building of this infrastructure was interpreted as motivated by a desire to "claim" the E1 area ahead of constructing residential neighborhoods.[34]

Israel claims that E1 plans have been regarded as strategically important for Jerusalem's security by all of Israel's former Prime Ministers since Prime Minister Rabin appended E1 to Ma'ale Adumim.[35] According to Ma'ale Adumim Mayor Bennie Kashriel, Mvasseret Adumim is needed to allow continuous natural growth in Ma'ale Adumim, and is essential for Ma'ale Adumim's security. Without Mvasseret Adumim, Ma'ale Adumim is detached from Jerusalem — which is a 12-minute car ride away, and is vulnerable to anyone who seizes the E1 range.[36] Ma'ale Adumim is often compared to Mount Scopus, an Israeli settlement under UN control threatened during multiple conflicts from 1948-1967. Israel also claims to have the legal authority to continue building and that a bypass road, the proposed solution to a continuous Palestinian state to be an acceptable solution that the PA agreed to in the past.[25]

International opposition

There has been wide-scale opposition to the plan – opposition mobilized originally by lawyers and activists, including those associated with Peace Now, who closely follow developments in Jerusalem.[37]

The United States has historically opposed the plan, with Israel stopping its construction under pressure of the Bush Administration.[38] In 2009, Israel conducted an additional understanding with the United States government not to build in the E1 zone. In 2012, Israel announced its intention to build 3,000 new housing units in the zone. A prominent Israel official explained the decision by stating that the agreement with the American government was "no longer relevant,"[39] claiming that the Palestinian Authority had "fundamentally violated" their prior agreements.

Israel's 2012 plan to move ahead with construction of 3,000 housing units in the E1 zone was faced with widespread international opposition. In particular, the European Union put strong diplomatic pressure on Israel to reverse its decision,[40] and Britain and France threatened to take the unprecedented action of withdrawing their ambassadors in reaction.[41]

The Palestinian Authority threatened to sue Israel in the International Criminal Court for international law and human rights violations over the E1 plan.[42]

Bedouin communities
See also: Khan al-Ahmar

At least eighteen Bedouin tribes have their homes in E1.[43][1] These include the Jahalin Bedouin who state they resided in the E1 area since the 1950s with the consent of the landowners from Abu Dis and al-Eizariya, whereas the Israel claimed that it was only around the year 1988 that groups of the Jahalin tribe began to settle there and on adjacent lands.[44]

Israeli efforts to remove the Jahalin Bedouin who live on the E1 lands have also been interpreted as preparing the ground for settlement construction. The European Union submitted a formal protest to the Israeli Foreign Ministry over evacuating Bedouin and tearing down Palestinians' houses in the E1 area in December 2011. Israel denied that such evacuations were a preparation for settlement construction.[45]

In February 2012, Israeli authorities abandoned plans to resettle the Jahalin Bedouin to the Abu Dis garbage dump, but confirmed their intention to concentrate them in one location, which would be contrary to their traditional nomadic lifestyle, based on animals grazing.[46] On 16 September 2014 it was announced that they would be moved to a new area in the Jordan Valley north of Jericho.[47]

Bab al Shams

On 11 January 2013, a group of about 250 Palestinian and foreign activists saying that they wanted to establish "facts of the ground" moved into the area to erect a tent site, which they wanted to develop into a village called Bab al-Shams.[48] Following a supreme court ruling and less than 48 hours after beginning protest the activists were forcibly evacuated, but the tent site was left for six days while the issue of its removal was being discussed.[48][49][50][51]

gollark: I thought they had.
gollark: Mine is more advanced™. Obviously it is inducing lag.
gollark: I see.
gollark: If the reactor is ever loaded without the machinery supplying it fuel it will probably shut down at some point. Which would be bad, since we have no backup.
gollark: It's on the ravineward side of the reactor and I believe all the supply systems for it should load at the same time as it on restart.

References
  1. Sherwood, Harriet (3 December 2012). "Israel's E1 plan: barren hills long targeted for settlement expansion". The Guardian. Retrieved 11 January 2013.
  2. Steven, Erlanger (17 December 2012). "West Bank Land, Empty but Full of Meaning". The New York Times. Retrieved 11 January 2013.
  3. "Settlements in Focus: Vol. 1, Issue 1 - "E-1 & Ma'ale Adumim" - Americans for Peace Now". Peacenow.org. 19 May 2005. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  4. Archived 25 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  5. possible peace between Israel and Palestine, By Menachem Klein, Haim Watzman, Columbia University Press, 2007, ISBN 0-231-13904-7, ISBN 978-0-231-13904-5, Page 74.
  6. Stoil, Rebecca Anna (10 August 2009). "Rivlin: No peace without E-1 building". Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on 8 July 2012. Retrieved 10 January 2012.
  7. Klein, Manachem (2010). The Shift: Israel-Palestine from Border Struggle to Ethnic Conflict. C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd. p. 61. ISBN 1849040850.
  8. Weekly Report: On Israeli Human Rights Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Archived 4 December 2010 at the Wayback Machine, Palestinian Center for Human Rights, accessdate 6 May 2009
  9. Jerusalem Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Passia, accessdate 6 May 2009
  10. U.S. Moment of Truth on Palestinian – Israeli Conflict, Global GeoPolitics News, accessdate 6 May 2009
  11. "The Geneva Convention". BBC News. 10 December 2009. Retrieved 27 November 2010.
  12. "Israel firm on settlements as world outcry grows". AFP. 5 December 2012. Retrieved 11 January 2013.
  13. "Palestinian activists set up 'outpost' near Jerusalem". AFP. 11 January 2013. Archived from the original on 16 February 2013. Retrieved 11 January 2013.
  14. "Editorial: The logic of E1". Jerusalem Post. 2 December 2012. Retrieved 15 December 2012.
  15. Berg, Raffi (12 November 2005). "Israel's Lynchpin Settlement". BBC News. Retrieved 10 January 2012.
  16. Second Maʹale Adumim outline plan 420/4, approved 1999.
  17. "Diplomacy & politics", The Jerusalem Post, archived from the original on 3 December 2012, retrieved 3 December 2012
  18. "Israel, PA E-1 zone settlements", Pulse, AL monitor, 2012
  19. "Israeli leader mocks EU 'dismay'", EU Observer, 11 December 2012, retrieved 15 December 2012
  20. "Israel stands by settlements plan despite growing diplomatic crisis", The Guardian, 3 December 2012, retrieved 15 December 2012
  21. "E1, against all odds - Israel Opinion, Ynetnews". Ynetnews.com. 20 June 1995. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  22. Harel, Amos (14 May 2009). "New West Bank roads jeopardizing chances for peace accord". Haaretz. Retrieved 25 March 2012.
  23. "Ezra: U.S. didn't object to E1 construction - Israel News, Ynetnews". Ynetnews.com. 20 June 1995. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  24. "Understanding Israeli Interests in the E1 Area". Jcpa.org. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  25. "Understanding Israeli Interests in the E1 Area". Jerusalem Center For Public Affairs. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  26. "Report claims PM holding up construction in E1". Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  27. Nicola Nasser (26 March 2009). "Moment of truth". Al-Ahram. Archived from the original on 18 August 2014.
  28. "Map of E1 plan". Web.archive.org. Archived from the original (JPG) on 8 February 2012. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  29. "View: Al Jazeera's second 'Napkin map' - Middle East - Jerusalem Post". Jpost.com. 24 January 2011. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  30. "Israel to advance East Jerusalem building plans". Associated Press. 4 December 2012. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  31. "Israel's E-1 settlement move seems counterproductive". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  33. "Netanyahu, Lieberman 'struck secret deal for West Bank construction'". Haaretz. 10 August 2009. Retrieved 10 January 2012.
  34. Harel, Amos (1 February 2009). "NIS 200m spent on new W. Bank neighborhood". Haaretz. Retrieved 25 March 2012.
  35. Kershner, Isabel (17 April 2006). "Unilateral Thinking". Jerusalem Report (cover story). Retrieved 10 January 2012.
  36. "Maale Adummim in the Future". Municipality of Maale Adummim. Archived from the original on 14 March 2012. Retrieved 10 January 2012.
  37. "Settlements in Focus - Vol. 1, Issue 15: Current Trends in Settlement Construction & Growth - Americans for Peace Now". Peacenow.org. 9 December 2005. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  38. "UPDATE 2-Netanyahu brushes off world condemnation of settlement plans". Reuters. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  39. "Israeli official: Agreement not to build in sensitive E1 zone 'no longer relevant'". Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  40. "Europe threatens to withdraw support for Israel over settlement building plans". Haaretz.com. 2 December 2012. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  41. "For first time, Britain, France may recall ambassadors to protest Israel's settlement construction". Haaretz.com. 3 December 2012. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  42. "BBC News - Palestinians threaten to sue Israel over settlements". BBC News. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  43. "Israel eyes a piece of land with alarming implications". The Economist. 16 January 2016. Retrieved 16 January 2016.
  44. HCJ 2966/95, Muhammad Ahmad Salem Harash and nineteen others v Minister of Defense et al., Takdin Elyon 96(2) 866 (1996), par 2.
  45. Ravid, Barak (23 December 2011). "EU voices protest over Israeli policies in East Jerusalem, West Bank". Haaretz. Retrieved 12 January 2012.
  46. Hass, Amira (6 February 2012). "Bedouin community wins reprieve from forcible relocation to Jerusalem garbage dump". Haaretz. Retrieved 6 February 2012.
  47. Lee, Amanda (16 September 2014). "Israeli Government Plans to Forcibly Relocate 12,500 Bedouin - National - Israel News - Haaretz Israeli News Source". Haaretz.com. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  48. "Palestinians evicted from E1, east of Jerusalem, less than 48 hours after beginning protest". independent. 13 January 2013. Retrieved 18 January 2013.
  49. "Israel forcibly evacuates 'tent city'". Al Jazeera English. 13 January 2013. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  50. Lazar Simeonov (13 January 2013). "The rise and fall of Bab al-Shams". Al Jazeera English. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  51. "Israel evicts tent protesters at West Bank E1 settlement - BBC News". Bbc.co.uk. 13 January 2013. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  • "E1 development plan", Palestine facts (PDF) (map), Passia, archived from the original (PDF) on 27 September 2007, retrieved 15 August 2007.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.