Dunlop v Higgins

Dunlop v Higgins [(1848) 1 H.L.C. 381] was an early decision confirming the postal rule in the Scots law of contract formation. The decision was based on the earlier case of Adams v. Lindsell.

Facts

Dunlop & Company offered by post to sell 2,000 tons of pig-Iron at some price. The offer was sent on 28 January 1845. It reached Higgins on 30 January 1845. Higgins posted the letter of acceptance the same day but the defendant received it on 1 February 1845 with some delay. The defendant refused to supply the goods, because the prices had increased.

Judgment

It was held that the acceptor was not responsible for any delay in the course of the transit. Hence there was a binding contract. The posting of a letter accepting an offer constitutes a binding contract even if the letter never arrives due to the fault of the post office.

gollark: Wow, very μhahahaha.
gollark: That one is mildly evil, but I suppose my entry also happily mucks with the RNG.
gollark: Yes, I thought of this, but the issue is [REDACTED]ing grudgers.
gollark: The only major improvement I can think of would maybe be patternmatching on the weird alternating one, and turning evil at some point in order to exploit angels.
gollark: Against the random one it rapidly decides to not trust it and probably does well for it, against tit for tat it cooperates, against tat for tit it soon apifies it, against devil it also soon apifies it, against angel it's nice to it (suboptimal, can't really fix it easily), against time machine it cooperates, against grudger it cooperates, and that's basically it.

See also
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.