Drug Court of New South Wales

The Drug Court of New South Wales is an inferior court constituted as a court of record within the Australian court hierarchy with its jurisdiction limited to New South Wales, Australia. It is a specialist court that deals with criminal offences in which the defendant has an addiction to illicit drugs. The Court exercises both local and district court jurisdiction and has a similar status to the District Court of New South Wales.

Drug Court of New South Wales
Established5 February 1999 (1999-02-05)
JurisdictionNew South Wales, Australia
LocationParramatta, Toronto, and Sydney CBD
Composition methodVice-regal appointment on the Premier's nomination, following advice of the Attorney- General and Cabinet
Authorized byParliament of New South Wales via the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW)
Appeals toNew South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
Number of positions5
Websitedrugcourt.justice.nsw.gov.au
Senior Judge, Drug Court of NSW
CurrentlyJudge Roger Dive

Established pursuant to the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW), the Court was the first drug court of its type in Australia.[1]

History

The Court commenced on 5 February 1999. The court arose of the use of drug courts in the United States of America. It commenced operations in Sydney as a pilot program with the goal of establishing the question of whether a Drug Court is more effective and cost-effective in reducing crime among drug-dependent criminal offenders than the conventional sanctions. The first participant commenced on 8 February.[1]

Jurisdiction

The Court is constituted by five Drug Court Judges, led by a Senior Judge, currently Judge Roger Diver. The Court operates from three locations in New South Wales: in Parramatta, Toronto, and Sydney CBD accepting referrals from the Local Court of New South Wales and the District Court. Matters referred to the Drug Court are then dealt with by that court, provided that the individual meets the eligibility criteria and is accepted onto the program. Matters for persons not accepted onto the program may be dealt with by the Drug Court but are usually referred back to the originating court for dispensation.[2]

Judges

The Governor may appoint District Court Judges to be a Drug Court Judge. The Governor may also appoint one of those Drug Court Judges to be a Senior Drug Court Judge.[3]

Objectives

The objectives of the Court are to reduce the drug dependency of eligible persons, to promote the re-integration of such drug dependent persons into the community, and to reduce the need for such drug dependent persons to resort to criminal activity to support their drug dependencies. The Court diverts drug dependent offenders into supervised treatment plans which aim to reduce or eliminate their drug dependence. Treatment options offered include abstinence and pharmacotherapy programs, and may be provided in either a community or residential rehabilitation environment.

There are four fundamental aspects that are common to each Drug Court program plan:-

  • Evidence-based treatment of drug use.
  • Social support and the development of living skills.
  • Regular reports to the Court regarding participant progress, and
  • Regular testing for drug use.

Eligibility and selection for a program

To be eligible for the Drug Court a person must:-

  • be highly likely to be sentenced to full-time imprisonment if convicted,
  • have indicated that he or she will plead guilty to the offence,
  • be dependent on the use of prohibited drugs,
  • reside within the specified catchment area,
  • be referred from a court in the catchment area,
  • be 18 years of age or over,
  • be willing to participate,
  • not be charged with a violent, sexual offence or an offence under Division 2 Part 2 of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act (1985), and
  • not be suffering a mental condition that could prevent or restrict participation in the program.

Program Progression

After detoxification and assessment, the offender appears before the Drug Court where he or she enters a guilty plea, receives a sentence that is suspended, and signs an undertaking to abide by his or her program conditions. This process marks the commencement of the offender's Drug Court program. Each participant's program comprises three phases. Each phase has distinct goals that must be achieved before the participant graduates to the next phase of their program.

Phase One is the 'initiation' phase where participants are expected to reduce drug use, stabilise their physical health and to cease criminal activity. In this phase, participants are required to undergo drug testing at least three times a week and to report back to the Drug Court once a week.

Phase Two is the 'consolidation' phase where participants are expected to remain drug-free and crime-free, and to develop life and job skills. In this phase, testing for drug use is conducted twice weekly and report-back court appearances occur fortnightly.

Phase Three is the 'reintegration' phase where participants are expected to gain or be ready to gain employment, and to be financially responsible. In this phase, drug testing is conducted twice weekly and report-back court appearances are conducted monthly.

The Court may confer rewards on a participant when they maintain a satisfactory level of compliance with their Drug Court program. Rewards may be simply a round of applause, or perhaps permission to work even during Phase One. Sanctions may be imposed on a participant who fails to comply with the program. Participants are informed of the types of behaviour that can attract rewards and sanctions. The most severe form of sanction available to the court, short of program termination, is a custodial sanction of up to 14 days. Community-based sanctions, such as increased supervision or community work, are also available to the Court. A program will last for at least 12 months unless it is terminated sooner.

A Drug Court program can be terminated when:-

  • the Court decides that the participant has substantially complied with the program, or
  • the participant applies to have it terminated, or
  • the Court decides that the participant is unlikely to make any further progress in the program, or that further participation poses an unacceptable risk to the community that the offender will re-offend.

When a program is terminated the Court must reconsider the initial sentence. If appropriate, that sentence can be set aside and another sentence imposed in its place. In deciding the final sentence the Court will take into consideration the nature of the offenders participation in the program, any sanctions that have been imposed and any time spent in custody during the program. The initial sentence cannot be increased. When the Court finds that a participant has substantially complied with a program a bond is the usual final court order. The Court awards a Certificate of Graduation or a Certificate of Substantial Achievement to participants who have met the standards that the Court has set.

gollark: Anyway, point is, assembly is absolutely not easier to do nontrivial things in than high-level languages, because high-level languages provide many helpful shortcuts.
gollark: Or, well, easy to use.
gollark: Which is *simple*, but not *easy*.
gollark: You can write an interpreter for that in a few hundred lines of high-level language.
gollark: If you want "simple", how about, I don't know, lisp?

See also

References
  1. "History". Drug Court of New South Wales. Government of New South Wales. 5 May 2015. Retrieved 12 August 2016.
  2. "Jurisdiction". Drug Court of New South Wales. Government of New South Wales. 24 March 2015. Retrieved 12 August 2016.
  3. "Judicial officers". Drug Court of New South Wales. Government of New South Wales. 5 May 2015. Retrieved 12 August 2016.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.