Counterurbanization

Counterurbanization, or de-urbanization, is a demographic and social process whereby people move from urban areas to rural areas. It is, like suburbanization, inversely related to urbanization. It first occurred as a reaction to inner-city deprivation.[1] More recent research has documented the social and political drivers of counterurbanization and its impacts in developing countries such as China, which are currently undergoing the process of mass urbanization.[2] It is one of the causes that can lead to shrinking cities.

While counterurbanization manifests differently across the world, all forms revolve around the central idea of migration movement from a populated location to a less populated location. Clare J.A. Mitchell, an associate professor in the Department of Geography at the University of Waterloo, argues that in Europe, counterurbanization involves a type of migration leading to deconcentration of one area to another that is beyond suburbanization or metro decentralization. Mitchell categorizes counterurbanization into three sub-types: ex-urbanization, displaced-urbanization, and anti-urbanization.[3]

Causes

Counter urbanization is the process by which people migrate from urban to rural communities, the opposite of urbanization. People have moved from urban to rural communities for various reasons, including job opportunities and simpler lifestyles. In recent years, due to technology, this process has been occurring in reverse. With new communications technology, people from rural communities can work from home because they can connect with each other via rural Internet, which means some employment opportunities no longer require moving to an urban community.[4] Counter urbanization is about people being able to explore alternatives to living in the city, creating changes in living location preferences.[5]

In past years, a multi-corporation business would use outsourcing by hiring workers in poorer countries for cheap labor. In more recent years, corporations have been using "rural sourcing which involves using small to medium sized town as a source of labor. This creates jobs in the country and also for rural communities so they do not need to move their entire family to a whole new setting and also reduces unnecessary expense for the companies. Most of the workers in these rural settings get paid less but have an option of either working from home or an office. If they were in an urban setting, the company would spend more money on an entirely new office for the urban-based employees to work at.[4]

In the past, the general migration trend in the United States has been from the east to the west. Art Hall, an executive director of the Centre for Applied Economics at the University of Kansas School of Business states "California has been losing people for at least a decade ... two patterns of migration are under way in California. People are leaving the coast and moving to the Northern interior. When they leave, they tend to go to places like Arizona and Nevada. So it's not a far move. And they also are going up north to Seattle and Portland. Part of the answer there is that it's just very expensive to live on the California coast."[6]

According to Hall, people have been influenced to move because of factors like climate, jobs, and tax rates. Hall also found that people who are not a part of a more stable family will tend to move more.[6] People choosing to live in rural areas have found it more beneficial because of cleaner air, peace and quiet, and lots of space. Smaller towns have also been proven to be convenient for the inhabitants.[4]

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) data published in a 2009 study shows that people are moving from big cities with populations over 4 million to much smaller cities with around 1-2 million people.[4]

The reasons that people are leaving cities for smaller cities is not the same across the globe. For Russia, jobs have not always moved to rural areas to accommodate those who want to leave the city. Rather, people find themselves having two homes, one in the city during work days and one in rural areas for days off. There is a weak infrastructure outside of cities to accommodate people who wish to completely relocate. In 2010, it was found that two-thirds of small towns are depressed, meaning that it has a large working-age population that is unemployed, and businesses are not profitable.[5]

Clare J.A. Mitchell believes the phenomenon of counterurbanization to be reflective of values and ideology in people’s preferred living style thus taking into consideration not only distances traveled from the urban area but the motivations. Mitchell uses the term “ex-urbanization” that is used in reference to the phenomenon that people reside in the outside perimeters of an urban city but remain closely involved through their social networks and jobs, and the term "ex-urbanites" in reference to those people. Ex-urbanites typically still enjoy the benefits of modern infrastructure. Another term concerning differing motives for traveling or moving away from the city is people who are forced out of the city due to factors such as: the inability to find work, the increased cost of living, or dissatisfaction and/or conflicts with the culture of urban society. This phenomenon is “displaced-urbanization”. Finally, there are those who participate in “anti-urbanization”. Typically these people are motivated by a sort of rejection concerning the urban lifestyle and consumer culture. Anti-urbanization is an escape for those to choose to leave and forgo the lifestyle and culture of the city. The decisive decision to move away from the city for this type of counter urbanization is usually a step toward spiritual growth and rejection of materialism.[3][7]

Political factors may also lead to anti-urbanization. During the "Cultural Revolution" in 1966-1976, urbanization in China stagnated, and a nation-wide anti-urbanization phenomenon occurred, which was specifically manifested in a large-scale "Down to the Countryside Movement". Intellectuals were persecuted and removed to rural areas. It is estimated that during the peak period of Down to the Countryside Movement at the end of the 1960s, more than 10 million people moved from urban China to rural areas, while the total urban population in China was only 168 million in 1968. This anti-urbanization event was fundamentally different from the counter-urbanization in developed countries, as it resulted from a far-left communist ideology.[8]

gollark: Æλε³²βït.
gollark: Given claims existing.
gollark: Your self replicating turtle would need some way to pick up the items from stores though.
gollark: Oops. I saw your self replicating turtle thing and there was interweb latency.
gollark: I suppose so. It's already been done though.

See also

References
  1. Berry, Brian J.L. (1980). "Urbanization and Counterurbanization in the United States". The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 451: 13–20. doi:10.1177/000271628045100103.
  2. Griffiths, Michael B.; Chapman, Malcolm; Christiansen, Flemming (2010). "Chinese consumers: The Romantic reappraisal". Ethnography. 11 (3): 331–357. doi:10.1177/1466138110370412.
  3. Mitchell, Clare J.A (2004). "Making sense of counterurbanization". Journal of Rural Studies. 20 (1): 15–34. doi:10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00031-7.
  4. Science Daily
  5. Nefedova, T.G. (May 2016). "Urbanization, Counter urbanization, and Rural-Urban Communities Facing Growing Horizontal Mobility". Sociological Research. 55 (3): 195. doi:10.1080/10610154.2016.1245570.
  6. "Study uncovers 'de-urbanization' of America (w/ Video)". Phys.org. 2009-09-24.
  7. Nefedova, Pokrovskii, Treivish, T.G., N.E., A.I. (2016). "Urbanization, Counterurbanization, and Rural–Urban Communities Facing Growing Horizontal Mobility". Sociological Research. 55 (3): 195–210. doi:10.1080/10610154.2016.1245570.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. 许学强 (Xu Xueqiang), 周一星 (Zhou Yixing), 宁越敏 (Ning Yuemin) (2009). "第五章 城市化的历史进程 第三节 当代中国城市化的进程". 城市地理学 [Urban Geography] (in Chinese) (2nd ed.). 高等教育出版社 (Higher Education Press). pp. 108–109. ISBN 978-7-04-025539-3.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.