Dean v. Utica Community Schools

Dean v. Utica Community Schools, 345 F. Supp. 2d 799 (E.D. Mich. 2004), is a landmark legal case in United States constitutional law, namely on how the First Amendment applies to censorship in a public school environment. The case expanded on the ruling definitions of the Supreme Court case Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, in which a high school journalism-oriented trial on censorship limited the First Amendment right to freedom of expression in curricular student newspapers.[1] The case consisted of Utica High School Principal Richard Machesky ordering the deletion of an article in the Arrow, the high school's newspaper, a decision later deemed "unreasonable" and "unconstitutional" by District Judge Arthur Tarnow.[2]

Dean v. Utica Community Schools
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Full case nameDean v. Utica Community Schools
Date decidedNovember 17, 2004
Docket nos.2:03-cv-71367
Citations345 F. Supp. 2d 799
Judge sittingArthur Tarnow

Case overview

On March 8, 2002, Utica High School Principal Richard Machesky asked the Arrow advisor to cut student reporter Katy Dean's story about school bus diesel emissions along with the adjoining cartoon and editorial, at the time claiming it was based on "unreliable" sources and was "highly inaccurate." After a year of asking school officials to reconsider their decision, Dean filed a lawsuit against the Utica Community Schools in federal court.

On October 12, 2004, Judge Arthur Tarnow determined that "The Arrow" student newspaper was an example of a limited public forum after reviewing the degree of control school officials exercised over the paper, which ultimately separated this case from the decision expressed in Hazelwood.[3] A limited public forum—in this context, a public forum created for use by student editors—can reasonably be regulated in terms of time, place, and manner of expression, but not on the substance of that expression.

Tarnow also examined Dean's article and determined that there was not a "significant disparity in quality between Dean's article in the Arrow and the similar articles in 'professional newspapers.'"[4] In addition to these two factors, the Judge decided that the school had censored the article in its own interest, by preventing the expression of its viewpoint, and then claiming it was "inaccurate."[5]

gollark: You can't use it in old browsers without crazy compilation processes, but on the server it ought to work.
gollark: Promises are monads! Mwahahahahaha!
gollark: ***functions***
gollark: ```scalacase _ => // Dafuq u doin.```Seen in OC source while trying to find the limit for maximum open channels (16 on most cards).
gollark: Postman or something?

See also

References
  1. Hazelwood School Dist. v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988).
  2. Dean v. Utica Community Schools, 345 F. Supp. 2d 799, 814 (E.D. Mich. 2004).
  3. Dean, 345 F. Supp. 2d at 806.
  4. Dean, 345 F. Supp. 2d at 811.
  5. Dean, 345 F. Supp. 2d at 812.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.