De Vos van Steenwijk
De Vos van Steenwijk is an old Dutch noble family from the Dutch province of Overijssel.
de Vos van Steenwijk | |
---|---|
noble family | |
Coat of Arms | |
Country | |
Founded | 14th century |
Founder | Coenraad van den Goere |
Titles | baron |
History
The family was already noble from earliest times ("Uradel"). The first documented ancestor is Coenraad van den Goere who is mentioned in 1318. His son Johan is the first member to carry the De Vos van Steenwijk surname. According to family tradition he was give the name De Vos (the Fox) because of his red hair.
Notable Members
- Jan Arend Godert de Vos van Steenwijk, politician.
- Willem Lodewijk de Vos van Steenwijk, politician.
- Alexine Leila Cunera de Vos van Steenwijk, VIP.
Gallery
- Havixhorst estate, property of the family in the 17th century.
- Coat of arms (1814)
Literature
- A.N. de Vos van Steenwijk, Het geslacht de Vos van Steenwijk in het licht van de geschiedenis van de Drentse Adel, uitg. Van Gorcum, Assen, 1976 ISBN 90-232-1273-8
- J.A. de Vos van Steenwijk, Het wapen van De Vos van Steenwijk en eenige mededeelingen betreffende enkele personen, behoord hebbende tot de eerste generatieën van dit geslacht, Voorstonden, 1908
- Nederland's Adelsboek 97 (2012), p. 1-66.
gollark: "It's only real work if you do manual labour, because that was around longer and is thus evidently the only valid kind, and it looks more difficult to me."
gollark: Yes, that is silly people being silly.
gollark: You're not really paying them for either as much as just the fact that they can do/make the thing you want and you are, presumably, willing to pay the price they ask for. Going around trying to judge someone else's "worth" in some way is problematic.
gollark: The learning time is amortized over all the other programming stuff they do, and it's not like they would somehow unlearn everything if you didn't pay more. Still, it is somewhat complicated and, er, possibly impossible, although if people want to do it (they regularly do complex things anyway if they're interesting) then why not.
gollark: Honestly it's not *that* practical a lot of the time because doing complex things is very hard and slow.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.