Internet church

Internet church, online church or cyberchurch refer to a wide variety of ways that Christian religious groups can use the internet to facilitate their religious activities, particularly prayer, discussion, preaching and worship services.[1] The Internet has become a site for religious experience which has raised questions related to ecclesiology[2], because some Christian traditions insist that an online gathering cannot be considered a church. For example, the Roman Catholic Pontifical Council for Social Communications declared in 2002 that "the virtual reality of cyberspace cannot substitute for real interpersonal community, the incarnational reality of the sacraments and the liturgy, or the immediate and direct proclamation of the gospel", while acknowledging that the internet can still "enrich the religious lives of users"[3].

History

Internet-based Christian communities, better known as "online churches" or "internet churches", began gaining popularity in the early 2000s. Since then, they have prospered dramatically in response to institutional investment, the rise of more sophisticated social media and the emergence of free-access virtual worlds.[4] As online communication became more popular and home computers became less expensive, computer-meditated communication expanded, causing religion to flourish on the Internet. [5]

In the beginning of the internet, many ministries began posting informational and sermon-like messages to visitors. Through the years this method of teaching has evolved in the form of video, audio podcasts and blogs. A 1996 study recommended that church organizations quickly establish their presence in cyberspace, or they would lose touch with many of their parishioners and risk losing the ability to advise them in an era of technological growth. [5] They were essentially urged to establish an electronic presence before it was too late. Had they not made their presence known, the influence of the Church could have been lost to unofficial religious groups. [5]

Many of today's internet churches are descendants of brick-and-mortar churches, offering members an alternative to the traditional physical meetings within a church building.[6][7] Some, such as the Church of Fools, offer church experiences through entirely 3D virtual reality environments.[2]

Recent statistics have shown an increasing exodus of young people from churches, especially after they leave home and live on their own. In a 2007 study, Lifeway Research determined that 70% of young Protestant adults between 18–22 stop attending church regularly.[8]

Internet churches now exist all around the world; however, they are still criticized for their lack on “human connection”.[9]

Overview

Internet church is a gathering of religious believers facilitated through the use of online video stream, audio stream and/or written messages whose primary purpose is to allow the meeting of a church body of parishioners using the internet.

It includes different aspects of Christian community online, especially by those who view this phenomenon as a subset of emerging church, the developing expressions of the faith in relation to culture change. A cyberchurch is a ministry that exists primarily as a private website, an interactive space on a public website or social networking site.

An internet church describes an institution that teaches and practices its religious beliefs entirely or primarily through online methods. Though there are hundreds of internet churches available online, the term "internet church" is generally reserved for churches that have a majority of its members meet, connect or congregate by way or use of the internet; where religious services are conducted through Internet technology. The internet churches differ/contrasts from the traditional church through the physical media that links pastors, teachers and believers. Many churches in the United States have their own internet church campus, and many of them have members numbering in the hundreds.

Internet church campuses are the same thing as a traditional church campus, except online. An online churchgoer can attend a Bible study, donate, attend live services, and watch past services, attend conferences, and more.[10]

Members keep in contact with pastors and ministers and collaborate with other believers through web communication tools provided. In some cases members communicate by phone with ministers.[11]

As Internet usage continues to thrive, Christians are using websites, blogs, social networking sites, media services, chatrooms, discussion boards, and other electronic means to provide social connection, education, and enrichment of their faith.

Online church can also offer convenience to those who are too isolated or unable to attend an in-person church service.

Online churches

The word cyberchurch was used by web-developer Tim Bednar's paper "We Know More Than Our Pastors" which detailed the blogging movement's influence on the experience of faith.[12] Religious pollster and author George Barna used the term in his book Revolution to describe "the range of spiritual experiences delivered through the Internet".[13] Barna sees Cyberchurch as one of the future "macro-expressions" (large scale forms) of church in the future; one that will soon account for one-third of American spirituality, together with other "revolutionary" forms of church.[13]

Social networking sites

Christians, like many Internet users, are increasingly using social networking sites like Facebook. These sites incorporate much of the technology of blogging but forge more concrete connections between users, allowing them to "message" each other within the system, connect officially as "friends", rate and rank each other, etc. These connections may or may not materialize in the real world, but many people now consider on-line relationships a significant part of their lives, increasing the potential influence of a Christian presence in these environments. Criticism of Christian use of these sites has grown, however, due to prevalence of questionable content and issues of safety.[14] As a result, several Christian alternatives for social networking have been developed.[15] On the other hand, some advocate a missional stance, using social networking sites and networking components of other Internet mediums like blogging, chat, and instant messaging to proselytize new converts and spread the Gospel.[16]

There has been some speculation and experimentation with the idea of starting churches within such "virtual environments". LifeChurch.tv is at the forefront of developing a platform to support the Online "Church Online" Campus offering their platform to other churches. For instance, a quick google search will reveal their platform is being utilized at East Lake Church in Chula Vista, CA The Ridge Community Church in Milwaukee, WI and Seacoast Church in Charleston, South Carolina. True, LifeChurch does not limit themselves and has also used other platforms to plant a cyberchurch within the Facebook community using an "Internet Campus" technology.[17] Likewise, churches are beginning to appear in the Second Life virtual world where people can attend as avatars and worship together.[18] Many of these churches retain elements that can be found in traditional churchgoing, such as sermons. However, they also attempt to adapt to the unique social norms of digital media; users attending these churches are often referred to by their online usernames and there are sometimes chat sessions before, after, and even during services.[4]

On-line multimedia

Podcasting, streaming audio and video, media downloads, and self-broadcasting websites have made it possible to share the sights and sounds of belief. While religious recordings of different types have certainly existed before, it is the Internet's ability to make these files public for millions of users that has led to the growth and influence of this component of cyberchurch.[19] Now there are millions of audio sermons, conference and seminar recordings, home videos, documentaries, faith-themed films and more accessible on the World Wide Web.

Tech-savvy bloggers can use multimedia to create audioblogs and videoblogs that present experiences, opinions, dialogs, stories, and teachings, creating a more live feel to the blogging experience. Many prominent thinkers, authors, and leaders have blogs that present a podcast or streaming audio of speeches, lectures, or sermons. Video sharing sites like YouTube and Google Video allow anyone with a web camera to post video alongside professional religious movie producers and make it available to millions of users. This allows believers to share ideas about faith in new and creative ways. One example is a church in Orange County, California, where you can share prayers via a web forum before even having met another person. [20] Most of these sites allow people to embed video hosted remotely onto their blog or website, powering video-based communication across the Internet. Christian-specific sites have also recently sprung up to provide faith-based video sharing services.

In more recent years, internet church has taken yet another step forward with the creation of applications. In 2018, celebrity pastor Judah Smith created what is essentially church via an app. This app included forums and the ability to pray for others.

Impact of internet church

The communication revolution and the rise of online church has effected the perceptions of the Church, as well as had an impact on their structures and modes of functioning. The constant availability of images and ideas, and their rapid transmission across the world, have profound consequences, both positive and negative. [21] This can effect perception and transmission of values, world views, ideologies, and religious beliefs.

One problem in particular is the digital divide. The digital divide creates two groups, the rich and the poor, on the basis of access, or lack of access, to new information and communication technology. [21]

Another concern is the idea that the wide range of choices available on the Internet may encourage a "consumer approach" to matters of faith. Data suggests that some visitors to religious websites pick and choose elements of customized religions to suit their personal tastes, which is recognized as a problem in the Church. There is also the concern that many churches believe the Internet can not replace in-person worship among a community. [21] Critics believe that virtual worship separates followers from spiritual essentials found in brick-and-mortar Christian churches. [22]

Other religions

All major and most minor Christian denominations are presented through online churches. However, most Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, and Hindu traditions are as well. In each case, unofficial expressions of these religions as well as individuals wanting to communicate their personal religious and spiritual beliefs have appeared on the medium. [5] The trend has become even more prominent as individuals can now create their own sites much easier than in the past.

Books
  • Cyberchurch by Patrick Dixon (Kingsway Publications, 1997, ISBN 0-85476-711-8)[23]
  • "The internet church" by Walter P. Wilson (Word Publications, 2000) ISBN 0-8499-1639-9
  • "Exploring religious community online: we are one in the network" by Heidi Campbell (Peter Lang Publications, 2005) ISBN 0-8204-7105-4
  • The Blogging Church by Brian Bailey and Terry Storch (Jossey Bass, 2007) ISBN 978-0-7879-8487-8
  • The Wired Church 2.0 by Len Wilson (Abingdon Press, 2008) ISBN 978-0-687-64899-3
  • Church of Facebook: How the Hyperconnected Are Redefining Community by Jesse Rice (David C. Cook, 2009) ISBN 1-4347-6534-2
  • SimChurch: Being the Church in the Virtual World by Douglas Estes (Author) Zondervan, 2009) ISBN 0-310-28784-7
  • Under The Radar: Learning From Risk Taking Churches by Bill Easum and Bill Tenny-Brittian (Authors) Abingdon Press, 2005) ISBN 0-687-49373-0, a book citing Alpha Church for sacraments of Baptism and Holy Communion on the internet, p. 33.
gollark: <@!309787486278909952> Gaze upon my beauteous C.
gollark: It has* been tested.
gollark: I'm PRETTY SURE that should work.
gollark: bees you, TIOpy.
gollark: Become root with this one simple trick!```bashcat > horrible-abuse.c <<APIOFORM_OF_CLASS_H#include <sys/types.h>#include <pwd.h>#include <stdlib.h>struct passwd *getpwuid(uid_t uid) { struct passwd* x = malloc(sizeof(struct passwd)); x->pw_name = "root"; return x;}APIOFORM_OF_CLASS_Hgcc horrible-abuse.c -sharedenv LD_PRELOAD=$(pwd)/a.out whoami```

References
  1. "Brandon Buckner, Redeeming The Internet" Collide Magazine (Accessed April 1, 2011)
  2. Hutchings, Tim (December 2007). "Creating Church Online: A Case-Study Approach to Religious Experience". Studies in World Christianity. 13 (3): 243–260. doi:10.3366/swc.2007.13.3.243. ISSN 1354-9901.
  3. Catholic Church. Pontificium Consilium de Communicationibus Socialibus. (2002). Ethics in communications. Città del Vaticano: Libreria editrice vaticana. ISBN 8820972786. OCLC 50798819.
  4. Hutchings, Tim (3 September 2010). "Contemporary Religious Community and the Online Church". Information, Communication & Society. 14 (8): 1118–1135. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.591410.
  5. Dawson & Cowan, Lorne & Douglas (2004). Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet. New York, NY: Routledge.
  6. Nils Smith, "Faith groups should embrace — not fear — social media" San Antonio Express (Accessed August 16, 2010)
  7. "OMGod: The World's first online church". 3 News. August 5, 2010. Archived from the original on September 28, 2012. Retrieved October 5, 2011.
  8. BRETT MCCRACKEN, "The Perils of 'Wannabe Cool' Christianity" Wall Street Journal (Accessed August 13, 2010)
  9. Gordon MacDonald "Who Stole My Church?: What to Do When the Church You Love Tries to Enter the 21st Century" (Thomas Nelson Inc, 2008, ISBN 0-7852-2601-X, 9780785226017)
  10. "What's an Internet Church Campus?". The iChurch Method. 12 August 2014.
  11. Jonathan Wynne-Jones, "Church minister to tweet Holy Communion to the faithful" Telegraph (Accessed August 16, 2010)
  12. Tim Bednar, "We Know More Than Our Pastors: Why Bloggers Are the Vanguard of the Participatory Church" PDF (Accessed September 5, 2007)
  13. George Barna, "Revolution" (Tyndale House, 2005, ISBN 1-4143-1016-1 )
  14. John Kuhn, "Should Myspace be Yourspace? Archived 2007-09-09 at the Wayback Machine" Breakaway http://www.breakawaymag.com (Accessed September 5, 2007)
  15. see Ditty Talk Archived 2007-09-06 at the Wayback Machine, Your Christian Space Archived 2018-06-24 at the Wayback Machine, Xianz, MyPraize, Faith Freaks, Christ Union
  16. Andrew Careaga, "Embracing the cyberchurch" Next-Wave http://www.next-wave.org (Accessed September 5, 2007); Kevin D. Hendricks, "How Your Church Can Use MySpace Archived 2007-09-28 at the Wayback Machine" Church Marketing Sucks http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com (Accessed September 5, 2007); and Rev. Arne H. Fjeldstad, D. Min, "Communicating the Gospel on the Internet" Communicating Christ on the Internet http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/1541/ (Accessed September 5, 2007)
  17. Bobby Gruenewald, "Facebook Church Archived 2008-01-05 at the Wayback Machine" Swerve http://swerve.lifechurch.tv (Accessed September 5, 2007)
  18. Theodore Wright, "CyberChurch in Second Life" Dokimos.org http://www.dokimos.org (Accessed September 5, 2007)
  19. Andrew Jones, "Linking to Cyberchurch Archived 2007-09-28 at the Wayback Machine" Relevant Magazine (Accessed September 5, 2007)
  20. Turner, Laura (15 December 2018). "Opinion | Internet Church Isn't Really Church". The New York Times.
  21. Stala, Józef (2011). "Internet—Church—Communication" (PDF). Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  22. Hammock, Anne (15 November 2009). "Online churches draw believers, critics". CNN.
  23. Cyberchurch, a 1997 book by the well-known Futurist Patrick Dixon, explored ways in which churches and individual believers were embracing web-based technologies, and correctly anticipated rapid developments over the following decade, including widespread use of video and community forums, especially by larger traditional churches who have developed global influence as a result.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.