Cruciform wing

A cruciform wing is a set of four individual wings arranged in the shape of a cross. The cross may take either of two forms; the wings may be equally spaced around the cross-section of the fuselage, lying in two planes at right angles, as on a typical missile, or they may lie together in a single horizontal plane about a vertical axis, as in the cruciform rotor wing or X-wing.

Cruciform-wing missile

A Canadair CL-89 shows its cruciform wing

Rocket- and jet-propelled missiles often have a cruciform thin-wing arrangement in which four identical thin, low aspect ratio wings are equally spaced around a long, slender body.[1] Cruciform wing missiles are sometimes called Cruciform wing weapons (CWW) in contrast to planar wing weapons (PWW).

For wings of equal size and shape, this gives constant aerodynamic characteristics whatever the aircraft's angle of roll or direction of turn.

However, because only half the total lift of the four surfaces is available in any given attitude, the configuration is less efficient than a conventional planar wing.

The missile may also have small cruciform canard foreplane surfaces for flight trim and/or control. These may be set at 45° to the main wing, in order to minimise interference.

The aerodynamic properties of such a slender wing-plus-body configuration are different from those of the individual elements and the design needs to be evaluated as a unified form. A characteristic of the off-axis side forces is that they are relatively independent of the angle of pitch or yaw.[2]

Cruciform rotor wing

Sikorsky S-72 modified as the X-Wing testbed. It never flew.

The horizontal cruciform rotor wing, also known as the X-wing, is a form of the Stopped rotor.[3]

Teledyne Ryan studied the concept in the 1970s and took out a number of patents.[4][5] The X-Wing circulation control rotor was developed in the mid-1970s under DARPA funding. The concept was first developed by the David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center and an experimental rotor built by Lockheed Corporation, for testing on the Sikorsky S-72 Rotor Systems Research Aircraft (RSRA).[6][7]

Intended to take off vertically like a helicopter, the rigid rotor could be stopped in mid-flight to act as an X-shape cruciform wing providing lift during forward flight, assisting the RSRA's conventional fixed wings. Instead of controlling lift by altering the angle of attack of its blades as more conventional helicopters do, the craft used compressed air fed from the engines and expelled from its blades to generate a virtual wing surface, similar to blown flaps on a conventional platform. Computerized valves made sure the compressed air came from the correct edge of the rotor, the correct edge changing as the rotor rotated.[8]

In late 1983 Sikorsky received a contract to modify the S-72 RSRA as a demonstration testbed for the X-Wing rotor and it was rolled out in 1986. The program was cancelled two years later, after the X-wing had been installed but before it had flown.[9][10][11]

Other proposed applications

Solar-powered aircraft

Around 1980 NASA was studying the technical aspects of long-duration solar-powered UAVs. One configuration studied was a very-high-aspect-ratio cruciform fixed wing with solar panels mounted along one plane of the wing. The craft was able to roll at any angle to follow the sun, thus maximising the power available without loss of lift.[12][13]

Variable geometries

Bi-directional flying wing, plan view

Shortly after World War Two, the French company Matra began studies of a variable-geometry aircraft in which two sets of wings were provided, one for low-speed takeoff and landing, and the other for high-speed flight. Long-span wings for low speed flight were set at right angles to short-span wings for high-speed flight. One set lay horizontal for use as the lifting wings, while the other was set vertical. The supporting fuselage section could be rotated 90° to swap them over, and the unused set of wings could be folded backwards and partially or wholly retracted into the fuselage. It was patented by Matra's chief designer, Robert Roger, in 1946.[14]

The bi-directional wing is a similar approach to the same problem. It comprises a long-span low speed wing and a short-span high speed wing joined in the form of an unequal cross. The craft would take off and land with the low-speed wing across the airflow, then rotate it a quarter-turn so that the high-speed wing faces the airflow for supersonic travel. It has been studied in the form of a bi-directional flying wing.[15][16]

gollark: That sentence is very hard to parse.
gollark: I don't think the government should, basically ever, look at people's privateish lives like that.
gollark: > Social media check,ÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆAAAA?
gollark: As if people care about the consistency of their beliefs.
gollark: Instead of generating political opinions using some standard methodology, you just map days of the year to political opinions.

References

Notes

  1. Farmer (1956)
  2. Spreiter (1950): "The lift and pitching moment are independent of the angle of yaw, and the side force and yawing moment are independent of the angle of attack. If the vertical and horizontal wings are identical, the rolling moment is zero for all angles of pitch and yaw. By symmetry considerations, these results are shown to be equally applicable for any cruciform-wing and body combination having identical horizontal and vertical wings of arbitrary plan form and aspect ratio."
  3. Eisenberg, Joseph D.; "The Selection of Convertible Engines With Current Gas Generator Technology for High Speed Rotorcraft", Technical Memorandum 103774, NASA, 1990, p.3 :"Figure 4 shows the X-wing concept. This aircraft uses its rotor for vertical lift and low speed cruise. The rotor is then stopped to form a cruciform wing, and auxiliary propulsion is applied," and, "Figure 4. X-Wing Stopped-Rotor Aircraft".
  4. Girard, Peter F. (Teledyne Ryan); "VTOL aircraft with cruciform rotor wing", US Patent 3792827, filed 1972, issued 1974.
  5. Girard, Peter F. (Teledyne Ryan); "Aircraft with retractable rotor wing", US Patent 3986686: "Cruciform rotor wing", filed 1975, issued 1976.
  6. Warwick, Graham (August 9, 2008). "X-Wing". DARPA 50th Anniversary Gallery. Aviation Week & Space Technology. Retrieved October 26, 2012.
  7. Carlisle, Rodney P. (1998). Where the Fleet Begins: A History of the David Taylor Research Center, 1898–1998. Department of the Navy. pp. 373–9. ISBN 0-160494-427.
  8. Reader, Kenneth R; Wilkerson, Joseph B (2008) [1976]. Circulation Control Applied to a High Speed Helicopter Rotor (PDF). David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center.
  9. "X-Wing scheduled to fly in October" (PDF). Flight International: 18. 22 February 1986.
  10. "Darpa ditches X-Wing" (PDF). Flight International: 2. 16 January 1988.
  11. Art Linden, Ken Rosen and Andy White; "X-Wing", Sikorsky Product History, 2013. (retrieved 5 August 2018)
  12. Phillips, W. H.; "Solar-powered aircraft"; Document Type: NASA Technical Brief LAR-12615, 1981.
  13. Phillips, W. H.; "Solar-powered aircraft"; US patent 4,415,133, Filed 1981, Issued 1983.
  14. Robert, Roger Aimeé; "Improvements in or Relating to Aircraft", UK Patent 11006/47, accepted 1949.
  15. Zha, Im & Espinal, Toward Zero Sonic-Boom and High Efficiency Supersonic Flight: A Novel Concept of Supersonic Bi-Directional Flying Wing
  16. NIAC 2012 Phase I & Phase II Awards Announcement

Bibliography

  • Farmer, Peter J.; "Missile Design: The State of the Art", Flight, 7 December 1956, pp. 885-889.
  • Spreiter, John R.; "The Aerodynamic Forces on Slender Plane- and Cruciform-Wing and Body Combinations", Report 962, NACA, 1950.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.