Conus vittatus

Conus vittatus, common name the ribboned cone, is a species of sea snail, a marine gastropod mollusk in the family Conidae, the cone snails and their allies.[1]

Conus vittatus
Apertural and abapertural views of shell of Conus vittatus Hwass in Bruguière, J.G., 1792
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Mollusca
Class: Gastropoda
Clade: Caenogastropoda
Clade: Hypsogastropoda
Clade: Neogastropoda
Superfamily: Conoidea
Family: Conidae
Genus: Conus
Species:
C. vittatus
Binomial name
Conus vittatus
Hwass in Bruguière, 1792
Synonyms[1]
  • Conus (Dauciconus) vittatus Hwass in Bruguière, 1792 · accepted, alternate representation
  • Conus reevei Kiener, 1845
  • Poremskiconus vittatus (Hwass in Bruguière, 1792)
  • Purpuriconus vittatus (Hwass in Bruguière, 1792)

Like all species within the genus Conus, these snails are predatory and venomous. They are capable of "stinging" humans, therefore live ones should be handled carefully or not at all.

Description

The size of the shell varies between 22 mm and 50 mm. The color of the shell is pink-brown, maculated or strigated longitudinally with light chestnut, with chestnut-dotted revolving striae, and a ceritall white, chestnut maculated band. The convex spire is maculated with chestnut.[2]

Distribution

This marine species occurs in the Gulf of California, Western Mexico to the Pacific Ocean off Ecuador

  • Conus vittatus Hwass in Bruguière, J.G., 1792
  • Conus vittatus Hwass in Bruguière, J.G., 1792
gollark: Yes, and I'm saying that I don't like that they're called "organic".
gollark: Not using antibiotics on farm animals is very sensible though. I want to hoard all antibiotics for human or cool-animal use. Mwahahahaha.
gollark: I'm not really against *those*, I'm against the "organic" labelling.
gollark: Cancer is natural because nature bad because nature has insufficient checksums.
gollark: Nature is bad at its job sometimes, and also bad at providing for humans and also to some extent non-humans.

References
  1. Conus vittatus Hwass in Bruguière, 1792. Retrieved through: World Register of Marine Species on 27 March 2010.
  2. G.W. Tryon (1884) Manual of Conchology, structural and systematic, with illustrations of the species, vol. VI; Philadelphia, Academy of Natural Sciences
  • Kiener L.C. 1844–1850. Spécies général et iconographie des coquilles vivantes. Vol. 2. Famille des Enroulées. Genre Cone (Conus, Lam.), pp. 1–379, pl. 1–111 [pp. 1–48 (1846); 49–160 (1847); 161–192 (1848); 193–240 (1849); 241-[379](assumed to be 1850); plates 4,6 (1844); 2–3, 5, 7–32, 34–36, 38, 40–50 (1845); 33, 37, 39, 51–52, 54–56, 57–68, 74–77 (1846); 1, 69–73, 78–103 (1847); 104–106 (1848); 107 (1849); 108–111 (1850)]. Paris, Rousseau & J.B. Baillière
  • Puillandre, N.; Duda, T.F.; Meyer, C.; Olivera, B.M.; Bouchet, P. (2015). "One, four or 100 genera? A new classification of the cone snails". Journal of Molluscan Studies. 81: 1–23. doi:10.1093/mollus/eyu055. PMC 4541476. PMID 26300576.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.