Consequences of religiosity

Sociologists of religion have stated that religious behaviour may have a concrete impact on a person's life. These consequences of religiosity are thought to include emotional and physical health, spiritual well-being, personal, marital, and family happiness. [1] Although a simple correlation between religiosity and well-being is repeatedly reported in the research literature, recent multivariate research (which controls for other predictors of well-being) suggests religiosity's contribution to happiness is minuscule and sometimes negative. [2]

Glock's religiosity measure

This term consequences as the result of one's religiosity first appeared in Charles Y. Glock's five-dimensional religiosity measure. In the 1960s, Glock attempted to categorize the components of religiosity. In his five-dimensional scheme "consequences" are listed as the final dimension of religiosity. Glock theorized that certain consequences in a person's life can be attributed to religious living. Consequences of religiosity may include emotional and physical health, spiritual well-being, personal, marital, and family happiness. This, however, does not preclude the possibility of these factors working in the reverse as health, happiness and the like may interact with and have an influence on one's level of religiosity.[3]

Criticism of the term

Glock's consequential dimension of religiosity was criticized by some sociologists as they saw Glock's final dimension as consequence of religiosity and not a dimension of it.[4]

gollark: Technically, that would be classist.
gollark: Speed cameras work by detecting your car via reflected visible light photons. I don't think they can detect high-energy gamma rays. If you go fast enough, something something doppler effect and you will no longer be visible to it.
gollark: To escape speeding tickets, it's also worth accelerating to relativistic velocities.
gollark: Oh, I see.
gollark: Do you flee from your house via windows often?

See also

References

Footnotes
  1. Cornwall et al. 1986.
  2. Schuurmans-Stekhoven, J. B. 2019.
  3. Cornwall et al. 1986; Glock 1972.
  4. Fichter 1969; Payne & Elifson 1976.

Bibliography
Cornwall, Marie; Albrecht, Stan L.; Cunningham, Perry H.; Pitcher, Brian L. (1986). "The Dimensions of Religiosity: A Conceptual Model with an Empirical Test". Review of Religious Research. 27 (3): 226–244. doi:10.2307/3511418. ISSN 0034-673X.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Fichter, J. H. (1969). "Sociological Measurement of Religiosity". Review of Religious Research. 10 (3): 169–177. doi:10.2307/3510744. ISSN 0034-673X.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Glock, Charles Y. (1972). "On the Study of Religious Commitment". In Faulkner, Joseph E. (ed.). Religion's Influence in Contemporary Society: Readings in the Sociology of Religion. Columbus, Ohio: C. E. Merrill Publishing Company. pp. 38–56. ISBN 978-0-675-09105-3.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Payne, Barbara P.; Elifson, Kirk W. (1976). "Commitment: A Comment on Uses of the Concept". Review of Religious Research. 17 (3): 209–215. doi:10.2307/3510611. ISSN 0034-673X.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
Schuurmans-Stekhoven, J. B. (2019). "Auspicious or suspicious—Does religiosity really promote elder well-being? Examining the belief-as-benefit effect among older Japanese". Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 81: 129–135.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.