Conductance quantum

The conductance quantum, denoted by the symbol G0, is the quantized unit of electrical conductance. It is defined by the elementary charge e and Planck constant h as:

= 7.748091729...×10−5 S.[Note 1][1]

It appears when measuring the conductance of a quantum point contact, and, more generally, is a key component of the Landauer formula, which relates the electrical conductance of a quantum conductor to its quantum properties. It is twice the reciprocal of the von Klitzing constant (2/RK).

Note that the conductance quantum does not mean that the conductance of any system must be an integer multiple of G0. Instead, it describes the conductance of two quantum channels (one channel for spin up and one channel for spin down) if the probability for transmitting an electron that enters the channel is unity, i.e. if transport through the channel is ballistic. If the transmission probability is less than unity, then the conductance of the channel is less than G0. The total conductance of a system is equal to the sum of the conductances of all the parallel quantum channels that make up the system.[2]

Derivation

In a 1D wire, connecting two reservoirs of potential and adiabatically:

The density of states is

,

where the factor 2 comes from electron spin degeneracy, is Planck's constant, and is the electron velocity.

The voltage is:

,

where is the electron charge.

The 1D current going across is the current density:

.

This results in a quantized conductance:

Occurrence

Quantized conductance occurs in wires that are ballistic conductors, when the elastic mean free path is much larger than the length of the wire: . B. J. van Wees et al. first observed the effect in a point contact in 1988.[3] Carbon nanotubes have quantized conductance independent of diameter.[4] The quantum hall effect can be used to precisely measure the conductance quantum value.

Motivation from the uncertainty principle

A simple, intuitive motivation of the conductance quantum can be made using the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which states that the minimum energy-time uncertainty is , where is the Planck constant. The current in a quantum channel can be expressed as , where τ is transit time and e is the electron charge. Applying a voltage results in an energy . If we assume that the energy uncertainty is of order and the time uncertainty is of order τ, we can write . Using the fact that the electrical conductance , this becomes .

Notes

  1. S is the Siemens
gollark: Does anyone know of good compile-to-Lua languages with good CC interop, actually?
gollark: If I eventually rewrite Dragon in a saner, nicer language, it'll include a simple patternmatching language to make that nicer.
gollark: I do admit that it does cause problems with `stone` and `redstone`, but I can't do much about that.
gollark: Then say `cobblestone`?
gollark: I meant using the keyboard with rightclicking it to open a remote thingy to another computer, and then using chat-like commands (but shorter - Dragon's equivalent to "I need 100 cobblestone" is `w 100 cob` (it will match anything containing`cob`)), not neural interface keybindy stuff.

References

  1. "2018 CODATA Value: conductance quantum". The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty. NIST. 20 May 2019. Retrieved 2019-05-20.
  2. S. Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems, Cambridge University Press, 1995, ISBN 0-521-59943-1
  3. B.J. van Wees; et al. (1988). "Quantized Conductance of Point Contacts in a Two-Dimensional Electron Gas". Physical Review Letters. 60 (9): 848–850. Bibcode:1988PhRvL..60..848V. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.848. hdl:1887/3316. PMID 10038668.
  4. S. Frank; P. Poncharal; Z. L. Wang; W. A. de Heer (1998). "Carbon Nanotube Quantum Resistors". Science. 280 (1744–1746): 1744–6. Bibcode:1998Sci...280.1744F. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.485.1769. doi:10.1126/science.280.5370.1744. PMID 9624050.

See also

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.