Commutation matrix

In mathematics, especially in linear algebra and matrix theory, the commutation matrix is used for transforming the vectorized form of a matrix into the vectorized form of its transpose. Specifically, the commutation matrix K(m,n) is the nm × mn matrix which, for any m × n matrix A, transforms vec(A) into vec(AT):

K(m,n) vec(A) = vec(AT) .

Here vec(A) is the mn × 1 column vector obtain by stacking the columns of A on top of one another:

vec(A) = [ A1,1, ..., Am,1, A1,2, ..., Am,2, ..., A1,n, ..., Am,n ]T

where A = [Ai,j].

The commutation matrix is a special type of permutation matrix, and is therefore orthogonal. Replacing A with AT in the definition of the commutation matrix shows that K(m,n) = (K(n,m))T. Therefore in the special case of m = n the commutation matrix is an involution and symmetric.

The main use of the commutation matrix, and the source of its name, is to commute the Kronecker product: for every m × n matrix A and every r × q matrix B,

K(r,m)(A B)K(n,q) = B A.

It is much used in developing the higher order statistics of Wishart covariance matrices.[1]

An explicit form for the commutation matrix is as follows: if er,j denotes the j-th canonical vector of dimension r (i.e. the vector with 1 in the j-th coordinate and 0 elsewhere) then

K(r,m) = (er,iem,jT)(em,jer,iT).

Example

Let M be a 2x2 square matrix.

Then we have

And K(2,2) is the 4x4 square matrix that will transform vec(M) into vec(MT)


For both square and rectangular matrices of columns, the commutation matrix can be generated by this generic pseudo-code, which is similar to an article at StackExchange.com[2] and demonstrably gives the correct result though is presented without proof.

 for i = 1 to M
     for j = 1 to N
        K(i + M*(j - 1), j + N*(i - 1)) = 1
     end
  end

Thus the following has two possible vectorizations as follows:

and the code above yields

giving the expected results

gollark: I doubt they'd be judged substantially on ridiculous twitter drama.
gollark: I doubt the tweet would do anything though.
gollark: That's not really better. And it seems entirely consistent with your statements here that you would actually have done it.
gollark: You don't actually know how many would buy yBot if it was not leaked.
gollark: The DMCA is, yes.

References

  1. von Rosen, Dietrich (1988). "Moments for the Inverted Wishart Distribution". Scand J Statistics. 15: 97–109.
  2. "Kronecker product and the commutation matrix". Stack Exchange. 2013. |first= missing |last= (help)
  • Jan R. Magnus and Heinz Neudecker (1988), Matrix Differential Calculus with Applications in Statistics and Econometrics, Wiley.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.