Civilian subject to service discipline

A civilian subject to service discipline is someone who, whilst not a member of the British Armed Forces, is nevertheless subject to some aspects of British military law and the military justice system.

Categories

The Armed Forces Act 2006 defines who is a civilian subject to service discipline. The main categories are:[1]

  • civilians on board a military ship when afloat, or on board a military aircraft when in flight
  • civil servants working in support of the armed forces, when in a designated area (see below)
  • civilians employed by NATO by reason of the United Kingdom's membership of NATO, when outside the British Islands[2]
  • civilians employed by certain support organisations, when in a designated area[3]
  • civilians living with or staying with a service person or other civilian subject to service discipline, when in a designated area
  • others designated by the Defence Council, for example contractors deployed on operations

Designated areas

The following countries are designated areas in respect of civil servants, employees of support organizations and civilians living with or staying with either of those:[4]

The following countries are designated areas in respect of civilians living with or staying with a service person:[4]

  • Belize
  • Brunei Darussalam
  • Falkland Islands
  • Germany
  • Gibraltar
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Cyprus
  • Turkey
  • The Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia
  • Kuwait
  • Oman

These definitions will therefore include, for example, family members living with a soldier stationed in Germany.

Civilians subject to service discipline may be tried in the Service Civilian Court[5] or by the Court Martial (although the Court Martial will be made up of civilian, not military, members[6]).

Comparison with other countries

The list of civilians who are subject to service discipline is more extensive than in some other countries—for example, in the United States, civilian spouses, dependents, and guests of military personnel are not included in the list of people subject to that country's Uniform Code of Military Justice.[7]

gollark: I've heard of those. It has some kind of floating point conversion stuff.
gollark: Økay.
gollark: Oh, so your issue is its increasing CISCness?
gollark: I'd like to know *why* you think ARM is so bad, since it is increasingly prevalent nowadays.
gollark: I mean, I don't know much about ARM vs x86, yes, but calling it "garbage" seems at least very hyperbolic to me.

See also

References
  1. See Text of Schedule 15, Part 1 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk.
  2. See Text of Schedule 1 of the Armed Forces (Civilians Subject to Service Discipline) Order 2009 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk.
  3. See Text of Schedule 2 of the Armed Forces (Civilians Subject to Service Discipline) Order 2009 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk.
  4. See Text of the Schedule 3 of the Armed Forces (Civilians Subject to Service Discipline) Order 2009 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk.
  5. Section 51 of the Armed Forces Act 2006
  6. Rule 33 of The Armed Forces (Court Martial) Rules 2009 (Statutory Instrument 2009/2041), Office of Public Sector Information
  7. 10 U.S.C. § 802
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.