Chilliwhack (electoral district)
Chilliwhack was a provincial electoral district in the Canadian province of British Columbia from 1903. It was the successor riding to Westminster-Chilliwhack and itself was succeeded by Chilliwack after the 1912 election.
Demographics
| Population, 1961 | |
| Population change, 1871–1961 | |
| Area (km²) | |
| Population density (people per km²) |
Political Geography and History
Notable elections
Notable MLAs
Electoral history
Note: Winners of each election are in bold.
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | Expenditures | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | John Luther Atkinson | 267 | 44.72% | unknown | ||
| Liberal | Charles William Munro | 330 | 55.28% | unknown | ||
| Total valid votes | 597 | 100.00% | ||||
| Total rejected ballots | ||||||
| Turnout | % | |||||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | Expenditures | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | Samuel Arthur Cawley | 310 | 48.36% | unknown | ||
| Liberal | Charles William Munro | 331 | 51.64% | unknown | ||
| Total valid votes | 641 | 100.00% | ||||
| Total rejected ballots | ||||||
| Turnout | % | |||||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | Expenditures | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | Samuel Arthur Cawley | 604 | 54.07% | unknown | ||
| Liberal | Charles William Munro | 513 | 45.93% | – | unknown | |
| Total valid votes | 1,117 | 100.00% | ||||
| Total rejected ballots | ||||||
| Turnout | % | |||||
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | Expenditures | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | Samuel Arthur Cawley | Acclaimed | -.-% | unknown | ||
| Total valid votes | n/a | 100.00% | ||||
| Total rejected ballots | ||||||
| Turnout | % | |||||
A redistribution following the 1912 election adjusted this riding's boundaries somewhat, and adopted the more modern form of the name, such that the successor riding is Chilliwack (no "h").
gollark: Applications may occasionally be answered.
gollark: https://a.gh0.pw/3
gollark: I mean making good use of the DNS packets, not CPU use on each end; I don't really care about that.
gollark: So you probably need checksums now and you use up even more of the packet size.
gollark: And you also need to be able to autodetect properties of the system of DNS servers between you and the authoritative one doing the actual bridging. But that might randomly change (e.g. if you switch network) and start messing up your data.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.