Chilliwhack (electoral district)
Chilliwhack was a provincial electoral district in the Canadian province of British Columbia from 1903. It was the successor riding to Westminster-Chilliwhack and itself was succeeded by Chilliwack after the 1912 election.
Demographics
Population, 1961 | |
Population change, 1871–1961 | |
Area (km²) | |
Population density (people per km²) |
Political Geography and History
Notable elections
Notable MLAs
Electoral history
Note: Winners of each election are in bold.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Luther Atkinson | 267 | 44.72% | unknown | ||
Liberal | Charles William Munro | 330 | 55.28% | unknown | ||
Total valid votes | 597 | 100.00% | ||||
Total rejected ballots | ||||||
Turnout | % |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Samuel Arthur Cawley | 310 | 48.36% | unknown | ||
Liberal | Charles William Munro | 331 | 51.64% | unknown | ||
Total valid votes | 641 | 100.00% | ||||
Total rejected ballots | ||||||
Turnout | % |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Samuel Arthur Cawley | 604 | 54.07% | unknown | ||
Liberal | Charles William Munro | 513 | 45.93% | – | unknown | |
Total valid votes | 1,117 | 100.00% | ||||
Total rejected ballots | ||||||
Turnout | % |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Samuel Arthur Cawley | Acclaimed | -.-% | unknown | ||
Total valid votes | n/a | 100.00% | ||||
Total rejected ballots | ||||||
Turnout | % |
A redistribution following the 1912 election adjusted this riding's boundaries somewhat, and adopted the more modern form of the name, such that the successor riding is Chilliwack (no "h").
gollark: What if I have a function which returns u8, but REALLY it will only return 3 or 86 in practice?
gollark: Besides, there's more to it than types.
gollark: I can't see any obvious applications.
gollark: I don't know. As ever, it probably depends on what you actually want to use this "information theory" for.
gollark: A product type is thing *and* other thing because the set of possible values is the Cartesian product of the sets of things its components can be.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.