Carroll v. United States (1957)
Carroll v. United States, 354 U.S. 394 (1957),[1] was a case dealing with the appealablility of a suppression order issued by the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia for an unlawful warrant under the Fourth Amendment.
Carroll v. United States | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued April 4, 1957 Decided June 24, 1957 | |
Full case name | Leon F. Carroll and Daniel J. Stewart v. United States |
Citations | 354 U.S. 394 (more) 77 S. Ct. 1332; 1 L. Ed. 2d 1442 |
Case history | |
Prior | |
Holding | |
The order of suppression of evidence in this case by the District Court is not appealable under the statutes of the federal appeals courts; therefore, the appeal should've been dismissed. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Warren, joined by unanimous |
In February of 1957, officers arrested Carroll and Stewart on John Doe arrest warrants for violations of local lottery laws. During the detainment, officers conducted a Search Incident to Arrest and seized evidence from their person. They petitioned the District Court for suppression of the evidence on grounds that the warrants were null and void due to the lack of the Constitutionally required probable cause under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.[2] The District Court granted the petition. The Government appeals to the Federal Court of Appeals, which reversed the suppression order.
In a unanimous 9-0 opinion written by Justice Warren, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed the Court of Appeals, stating that:
πΌπ‘ ππ ππ₯πππππ‘ππ, ππ π πππ‘π‘ππ ππ βππ π‘πππ¦ ππ π€πππ ππ ππππ‘ππππ, π‘βππ‘ π‘βπ ππ₯ππ π‘ππππ ππ ππππππππ‘π ππ’πππ ππππ‘πππ ππ π π πππππππ πππππππ πππ’ππ‘ ππ£ππ π πππ£ππ π‘π¦ππ ππ πππ π ππ πππππππππ‘ π’πππ ππ’π‘βππππ‘π¦ ππ₯ππππ π ππ¦ πππππππππ ππ¦ π π‘ππ‘π’π‘π. [3]
The Court held that, although some orders may be appealable under the authority of 18 U.S.C. 1291, this order in this case lacked such authority. The Circuit Court was reversed and remanded.
References
- "Carroll vs. United States, 1957". Oyez.
- πβπ π ππβπ‘ ππ π‘βπ ππππππ π‘π ππ π πππ’ππ ππ π‘βπππ ππππ πππ , βππ’π ππ , ππππππ , πππ ππππππ‘π , ππππππ π‘ π’πππππ ππππππ π ππππβππ πππ π πππ§π’πππ , π βπππ πππ‘ ππ π£πππππ‘ππ; πππ ππ ππππππππ πππππ πππππ, πππ ππππ ππππππππ πππππ, π π’πππππ‘ππ ππ¦ πππ‘β ππ ππππππππ‘πππ, πππ ππππ‘πππ’πππππ¦ πππ πππππππ π‘βπ πππππ π‘π ππ π ππππβππ, πππ π‘βπ ππππ πππ ππ π‘βππππ π‘π ππ π πππ§ππ. The Fourth Amendment.
- Carroll v. United States, 354 U.S. 394 (1957).
External links
- Text of Carroll v. United States, 354 U.S. 394 (1957) is available from: CourtListener Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)