Canton of Vailly-sur-Aisne
The canton of Vailly-sur-Aisne is a former administrative division in northern France. It was disbanded following the French canton reorganisation which came into effect in March 2015. It consisted of 26 communes, which joined the canton of Fère-en-Tardenois in 2015.[1] It included the following communes:
| Commune | Inhabitants | Postal code | INSEE code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aizy-Jouy | 242 | 2370 | 02008 |
| Allemant | 117 | 2320 | 02010 |
| Braye | 131 | 2880 | 02118 |
| Bucy-le-Long | 1 958 | 2880 | 02131 |
| Celles-sur-Aisne | 205 | 2370 | 02148 |
| Chavignon | 793 | 2000 | 02174 |
| Chavonne | 182 | 2370 | 02176 |
| Chivres-Val | 575 | 2880 | 02190 |
| Clamecy | 272 | 2880 | 02198 |
| Condé-sur-Aisne | 358 | 2370 | 02210 |
| Filain | 89 | 2000 | 02311 |
| Laffaux | 145 | 2880 | 02400 |
| Margival | 325 | 2880 | 02464 |
| Missy-sur-Aisne | 667 | 2880 | 02487 |
| Nanteuil-la-Fosse | 134 | 2880 | 02537 |
| Neuville-sur-Margival | 91 | 2880 | 02551 |
| Ostel | 82 | 2370 | 02577 |
| Pargny-Filain | 201 | 2000 | 02589 |
| Pont-Arcy | 109 | 2160 | 02612 |
| Sancy-les-Cheminots | 106 | 2880 | 02698 |
| Soupir | 282 | 2160 | 02730 |
| Terny-Sorny | 328 | 2880 | 02739 |
| Vailly-sur-Aisne | 2 081 | 2370 | 02758 |
| Vaudesson | 178 | 2320 | 02766 |
| Vregny | 102 | 2880 | 02828 |
| Vuillery | 24 | 2880 | 02829 |
Vailly-sur-Aisne | |
|---|---|
Former canton | |
| Country | France |
| Region | Hauts-de-France |
| Department | Aisne |
| No. of communes | 26 |
| Disbanded | 2015 |
| Seat | Vailly-sur-Aisne |
| Area | |
| • Total | 162.30 km2 (62.66 sq mi) |
| Population (1999) | |
| • Total | 9,777 |
| • Density | 60/km2 (200/sq mi) |
Demographics
| Year | 1962 | 1968 | 1975 | 1982 | 1990 | 1999 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | 7 069 | 7 932 | 8 217 | 8 634 | 9 389 | 9 777 |
| From the year 1962 on: No double counting—residents of multiple communes (e.g. students and military personnel) are counted only once. | ||||||
gollark: Based on what?
gollark: I mean, Western-ish societies *do* it, that doesn't make it *demonstrably optimal*.
gollark: Proven *how*?
gollark: Really? Hmm.
gollark: No, as in I don't think marriage laws are written to handle it, but it's not actually illegal to be in a polygamous relationship in most places as far as I know.
See also
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.