Canton of Marcillat-en-Combraille
The canton of Marcillat-en-Combraille is a former administrative division in central France. It was disbanded following the French canton reorganisation which came into effect in March 2015. It consisted of 13 communes, which joined the new canton of Montluçon-3 in 2015.[1] It included the following communes:
| Commune | Inhabitants | Postal code | INSEE code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arpheuilles-Saint-Priest | 307 | 03420 | 03007 |
| La Celle | 407 | 03600 | 03047 |
| Durdat-Larequille | 1 109 | 03310 | 03106 |
| Marcillat-en-Combraille | 912 | 03420 | 03161 |
| Mazirat | 267 | 03420 | 03167 |
| La Petite-Marche | 215 | 03420 | 03206 |
| Ronnet | 177 | 03420 | 03216 |
| Saint-Fargeol | 218 | 03420 | 03231 |
| Saint-Genest | 347 | 03310 | 03233 |
| Saint-Marcel-en-Marcillat | 138 | 03420 | 03244 |
| Sainte-Thérence | 188 | 03420 | 03261 |
| Terjat | 228 | 03420 | 03280 |
| Villebret | 1 021 | 03310 | 03314 |
Marcillat-en-Combraille | |
|---|---|
Former canton | |
| Country | France |
| Region | Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes |
| Department | Allier |
| No. of communes | 13 |
| Disbanded | 2015 |
| Seat | Marcillat-en-Combraille |
| Area | |
| • Total | 248.25 km2 (95.85 sq mi) |
| Population (1999) | |
| • Total | 5,534 |
| • Density | 22/km2 (60/sq mi) |
Demographics
| Year | 1962 | 1968 | 1975 | 1982 | 1990 | 1999 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | 5 474 | 5 933 | 5 304 | 5 267 | 5 412 | 5 534 |
| From the year 1962 on: No double counting—residents of multiple communes (e.g. students and military personnel) are counted only once. | ||||||
gollark: What insane programmer would go "well, I *could* just implement the industry standard for communication between web browsers and clients, which the browser already has native support for, but instead I'm going to implement one *myself* and then tweak it (because it's not like that requires specialized knowledge to do safely)"?
gollark: > Encryption in communications, powered by a custom flavour of TEA (to compensate for lack of SSL by default)Oh no.
gollark: Must I *really* deploy orbital question lasers?!
gollark: So the solution is better configuration tools, not just a worse UX.
gollark: The code is less complicated since it doesn't need to ship with some configurator tool, but it's also significantly more work unless you have a *really* bad configuration tool.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.