Canton of Condé-en-Brie
The canton of Condé-en-Brie is a former administrative division in northern France. It was disbanded following the French canton reorganisation which came into effect in March 2015. It consisted of 27 communes, which joined the new canton of Essômes-sur-Marne in 2015.[1] It included the following communes:
Commune | Inhabitants | Postal code | INSEE code |
---|---|---|---|
Artonges | 145 | 2330 | 02026 |
Barzy-sur-Marne | 356 | 2850 | 02051 |
Baulne-en-Brie | 238 | 2330 | 02053 |
Celles-lès-Condé | 77 | 2330 | 02146 |
La Celle-sous-Montmirail | 81 | 2540 | 02147 |
La Chapelle-Monthodon | 209 | 2330 | 02161 |
Chartèves | 370 | 2400 | 02166 |
Condé-en-Brie | 626 | 2330 | 02209 |
Connigis | 266 | 2330 | 02213 |
Courboin | 269 | 2330 | 02223 |
Courtemont-Varennes | 295 | 2850 | 02228 |
Crézancy | 1 069 | 2650 | 02239 |
Fontenelle-en-Brie | 171 | 2540 | 02325 |
Jaulgonne | 618 | 2850 | 02389 |
Marchais-en-Brie | 240 | 2540 | 02458 |
Mézy-Moulins | 461 | 2650 | 02484 |
Monthurel | 121 | 2330 | 02510 |
Montigny-lès-Condé | 56 | 2330 | 02515 |
Montlevon | 255 | 2330 | 02518 |
Pargny-la-Dhuys | 158 | 2330 | 02590 |
Passy-sur-Marne | 112 | 2850 | 02595 |
Reuilly-Sauvigny | 213 | 2850 | 02645 |
Rozoy-Bellevalle | 100 | 2540 | 02664 |
Saint-Agnan | 106 | 2330 | 02669 |
Saint-Eugène | 203 | 2330 | 02677 |
Trélou-sur-Marne | 892 | 2850 | 02748 |
Viffort | 212 | 2540 | 02800 |
Condé-en-Brie | |
---|---|
Former canton | |
Country | France |
Region | Hauts-de-France |
Department | Aisne |
No. of communes | 27 |
Disbanded | 2015 |
Seat | Condé-en-Brie |
Area | |
• Total | 242.80 km2 (93.75 sq mi) |
Population (1999) | |
• Total | 7,919 |
• Density | 33/km2 (90/sq mi) |
Demographics
Year | 1962 | 1968 | 1975 | 1982 | 1990 | 1999 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population | 6 458 | 7 040 | 6 772 | 7 012 | 7 458 | 7 919 |
From the year 1962 on: No double counting—residents of multiple communes (e.g. students and military personnel) are counted only once. |
gollark: Look at JSON.
gollark: If you don't have a consistent format for dates and whatnot, bad things happen.
gollark: If everything was UTF-8 strings and then application-parsed they would all be handled slightly differently by each library and it would be bad.
gollark: Also, probably more interoperability.
gollark: See above.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.