Cairns v Visteon UK Ltd

Cairns v Visteon UK Ltd (2006) is a United Kingdom labour law case, regarding the scope of protection available to agency workers.[1]* [2]

Cairns v Visteon UK Ltd
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
Decided29 November 2006
Citation(s)[2007] IRLR 175, [2007] ICR 616, [2006] UKEAT 0494_06_2911

Facts

An assistant manager of 7 years with Visteon UK Ltd, Ms Cairns became an agency worker for the four most recent years through an agency named ‘MSX’. She was dismissed for allegedly falsifying her time sheets. The agency did investigations and cleared her, but Ms Cairns was not allowed back to work. The agency gave her pay in lieu of notice and redundancy. But she wanted compensation for unfair dismissal and brought a claim to the tribunal.

Judgment

Judge Peter Clark held that Ms Cairns was not an "employee" under ERA 1996 s 230, and therefore could not bring an unfair dismissal claim. Doubting dicta in Dacas v Brook Street Bureau (UK) Ltd[3] by Sedley LJ he insisted there was different policy behind ERA 1996 Part 10 to that of tort law, and there was "no good policy reason for extending that protection to a second parallel employer."[4]

gollark: Replying to https://discord.com/channels/346530916832903169/348702212110680064/747813370417119253So osmarks internet radio™.
gollark: I can send you my entire musical playlist.
gollark: Anyone who dislikes the music on there is WRONG.
gollark: Why not osmarks internet radio™?
gollark: Ah yes, centrism?

References
  1. "[2007] ICR 616, [2007] IRLR 175 - Cairns v. Visteon UK Ltd". Archived from the original on 21 April 2013. Retrieved 13 January 2012.
  2. "Cairns v. Visteon UK Ltd [2006] UKEAT 0494_06_2911 (29 November 2006)". BAILII.
  3. [2004] IRLR 358
  4. [2007] ICR 616, [17]
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.